on the improvement of the understanding(戻互堋響嬬薦)-及6准
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
not as we imagine it。 ��2�� For instance�察�I know that the earth is round�察�but
nothing prevents my telling people that it is a hemisphere�察�and that it is
like a half apple carved in relief on a dish�察�or�察�that the sun moves round the
earth�察�and so on。 ��56��3�� However�察�examination will show us that there is
nothing here inconsistent with what has been said�察�provided we first admit
that we may have made mistakes�察 �and be now conscious of them�察 �and�察�
further�察�that we can hypothesize�察�or at least suppose�察�that others are under
the same mistake as ourselves�察�or can�察�like us�察�fall under it。 ��4�� We can�察�
I repeat�察�thus hypothesize so long as we see no impossibility。 ��56��5�� Thus�察�
when I tell anyone that the earth is not round�察�&c。�察�I merely recall the error
which I perhaps made myself�察 �or which I might have fallen into�察 �and
afterwards I hypothesize that the person to whom I tell it�察�is still�察�or may
still fall under the same mistake。 ��6�� This I say�察�I can feign so long as I do
not perceive any impossibility or necessity�察�if I truly understood either one
or the other I should not be able to feign�察 �and I should be reduced to
saying that I had made the attempt。
��57�А 。�1�� It remains for us to consider hypotheses made in problems�察�
which sometimes involve impossibilities。 ��2�� For instance�察�when we say
´ let us assume that this burning candle is not burning�察�or�察�let us assume
that it burns in some imaginary space�察 �or where there are no physical
objects。 ��3�� Such assumptions are freely made�察�though the last is clearly
seen to be impossible。 ��4�� But�察�though this be so�察�there is no fiction in
the case。 ��57��5�� For�察�in the first case�察�I have merely recalled to memory�察�
��x�А �another candle not burning�察 �or conceived the candle before me as
17
´ Page 18´
On the Improvement of the Understanding
without a flame�察�and then I understand as applying to the latter�察�leaving its
flame out of the question�察�all that I think of the former。 ��6�� In the second
case�察�I have merely to abstract my thoughts from the objects surrounding
the candle�察�for the mind to devote itself to the contemplation of the candle
singly looked at in itself only�察 �I can then draw the conclusion that the
candle contains in itself no causes for its own destruction�察�so that if there
were no physical objects the candle�察 �and even the flame�察 �would remain
unchangeable�察�and so on。 ��7�� Thus there is here no fiction�察�but�察。�y�А�true
and bare assertions。
��58�А 。�1�� Let us now pass on to the fictions concerned with essences
only�察�or with some reality or existence simultaneously。 ��2�� Of these we
must specially observe that in proportion as the mind's understanding is
smaller�察�and its experience multiplex�察�so will its power of coining fictions
be larger�察 �whereas as its understanding increases�察 �its capacity for
entertaining fictitious ideas becomes less。 ��58��3�� For instance�察 �in the
same way as we are unable�察 �while we are thinking�察�to feign that we are
thinking or not thinking�察�so�察�also�察�when we know the nature of body we
cannot imagine an infinite fly�察�or�察�when we know the nature of the soul�察。�z�А�
we cannot imagine it as square�察 �though anything may be expressed
verbally。 ��4�� But�察 �as we said above�察 �the less men know of nature the
more easily can they coin fictitious ideas�察 �such as trees speaking�察 �men
instantly changed into stones�察 �or into fountains�察 �ghosts appearing in
mirrors�察 �something issuing from nothing�察 �even gods changed into beasts
and men and infinite other absurdities of the same kind。
��59�А。�1�� Some persons think�察�perhaps�察�that fiction is limited by fiction�察�
and not by understanding�察 �in other words�察 �after I have formed some
fictitious idea�察�and have affirmed of my own free will that it exists under a
certain form in nature�察�I am thereby precluded from thinking of it under
any other form。 ��2�� For instance�察 �when I have feigned ��to repeat their
argument�� that the nature of body is of a certain kind�察�and have of my own
free will desired to convince myself that it actually exists under this form�察�
I am no longer able to hypothesize that a fly�察�for example�察�is infinite�察�so�察�
when I have hypothesized the essence of the soul�察�I am not able to think of
it as square�察�&c。
18
´ Page 19´
On the Improvement of the Understanding
��60�А 。�1�� But these arguments demand further inquiry。 ��2�� First�察 �their
upholders must either grant or deny that we can understand anything。 If
they grant it�察�then necessarily the same must be said of understanding�察�as
is said of fiction。 ��3�� If they deny it�察�let us�察�who know that we do know
something�察 �see what they mean。 ��4�� They assert that the soul can be
conscious of�察�and perceive in a variety of ways�察�not itself nor things which
exist�察�but only things which are neither in itself nor anywhere else�察�in other
words�察�that the soul can�察�by its unaided power�察�create sensations or ideas
unconnected with things。 ��5�� In fact�察�they regard the soul as a sort of god。
��60��6�� Further�察�they assert that we or our soul have such freedom that we
can constrain ourselves�察�or our soul�察�or even our soul's freedom。 ��7�� For�察�
after it has formed a fictitious idea�察 �and has given its assent thereto�察 �it
cannot think or feign it in any other manner�察�but is constrained by the first
fictitious idea to keep all its other thoughts in harmony therewith。 ��8��
Our opponents are thus driven to admit�察 �in support of their fiction�察 �the
absurdities which I have just enumerated�察 �and which are not worthy of
rational refutation。
��61�А 。�1�� While leaving such persons in their error�察�we will take care
to derive from our argument with them a truth serviceable for our purpose�察�
namely�察。�61a�А�that the mind�察�in paying attention to a thing hypothetical or
false�察 �so as to meditate upon it and understand it�察 �and derive the proper
conclusions in due order therefrom�察�will readily discover its falsity�察�and if
the thing hypothetical be in its nature true�察 �and the mind pays attention
to it�察�so as to understand it�察�and deduce the truths which are derivable from
it�察�the mind will proceed with an uninterrupted series of apt conclusions�察�
in the same way as it would at once discover ��as we showed just now�� the
absurdity of a false hypothesis�察�and of the conclusions drawn from it。
��62�А 。�1�� We need�察�therefore�察�be in no fear of forming hypotheses�察�so
long as we have a clear and distinct perception of what is involved。 ��2��
For�察�if we were to assert�察�haply�察�that men are suddenly turned into beasts�察�
the statement would be extremely general�察�so general that there would be
no conception�察�that is�察�no idea or connection of subject and predicate�察�in
our mind。 ��3�� If there were such a conception we should at the same time
be aware of the means and the causes whereby the event took place。 ��4��
19
´ Page 20´
On the Improvement of the Understanding
Moreover�察 �we pay no attention to the nature of the subject and the
predicate。
��63�А 。�1�� Now�察 �if the first idea be not fictitious�察 �and if all the other
ideas be deduced therefrom�察 �our hurry to form fictitious ideas will
gradually subside。 ��2�� Further�察 �as a fictitious idea cannot be clear and
distinct�察�but is necessarily confused�察�and as all confusion arises from the
fact that the mind has only partial knowledge of a thing either simple or
complex�察�and does not distinguish between the known and the unknown�察�
and�察 �again�察 �that it directs its attention promiscuously to all parts of an
object at once without making distinctions�察�it follows�察�first�察�that if the idea
be of something very simple�察�it must necessarily be clear and distinct。 ��3��
For a very simple object cannot be known in part�察�it must either be known
altogether or not at all。