Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > a history of science-4 >

µÚ47½Ú

a history of science-4-µÚ47½Ú

С˵£º a history of science-4 ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



ssential¡¡to¡¡the¡¡present¡¡consideration£©£»¡¡but¡¡had¡¡invented¡¡new¡¡methods¡¡of¡¡making¡¡similar¡¡tests£»¡¡and¡¡had¡¡reduced¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡question¡¡to¡¡mathematical¡¡treatment¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡pronounced¡¡Weber's¡¡discovery¡¡the¡¡fundamental¡¡law¡¡of¡¡psycho¡­physics¡£¡¡In¡¡honor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡discoverer£»¡¡he¡¡christened¡¡it¡¡Weber's¡¡Law¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡clothed¡¡the¡¡law¡¡in¡¡words¡¡and¡¡in¡¡mathematical¡¡formulae£»¡¡and£»¡¡so¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡launched¡¡it¡¡full¡¡tilt¡¡at¡¡the¡¡heads¡¡of¡¡the¡¡psychological¡¡world¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡made¡¡a¡¡fine¡¡commotion£»¡¡be¡¡assured£»¡¡for¡¡it¡¡was¡¡the¡¡first¡¡widely¡¡heralded¡¡bulletin¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡psychology¡¡in¡¡its¡¡march¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡strongholds¡¡of¡¡the¡¡time¡­honored¡¡metaphysics¡£¡¡The¡¡accomplishments¡¡of¡¡the¡¡microscopists¡¡and¡¡the¡¡nerve¡¡physiologists¡¡had¡¡been¡¡but¡¡preliminarymere¡¡border¡¡skirmishes¡¡of¡¡uncertain¡¡import¡£¡¡But¡¡here¡¡was¡¡proof¡¡that¡¡the¡¡iconoclastic¡¡movement¡¡meant¡¡to¡¡invade¡¡the¡¡very¡¡heart¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sacred¡¡territory¡¡of¡¡minda¡¡territory¡¡from¡¡which¡¡tangible¡¡objective¡¡fact¡¡had¡¡been¡¡supposed¡¡to¡¡be¡¡forever¡¡barred¡£


PHYSIOLOGICAL¡¡PSYCHOLOGY

Hardly¡¡had¡¡the¡¡alarm¡¡been¡¡sounded£»¡¡however£»¡¡before¡¡a¡¡new¡¡movement¡¡was¡¡made¡£¡¡¡¡While¡¡Fechner's¡¡book¡¡was¡¡fresh¡¡from¡¡the¡¡press£»¡¡steps¡¡were¡¡being¡¡taken¡¡to¡¡extend¡¡the¡¡methods¡¡of¡¡the¡¡physicist¡¡in¡¡yet¡¡another¡¡way¡¡to¡¡the¡¡intimate¡¡processes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mind¡£¡¡As¡¡Helmholtz¡¡had¡¡shown¡¡the¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡nervous¡¡impulsion¡¡along¡¡the¡¡nerve¡¡tract¡¡to¡¡be¡¡measurable£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡now¡¡sought¡¡to¡¡measure¡¡also¡¡the¡¡time¡¡required¡¡for¡¡the¡¡central¡¡nervous¡¡mechanism¡¡to¡¡perform¡¡its¡¡work¡¡of¡¡receiving¡¡a¡¡message¡¡and¡¡sending¡¡out¡¡a¡¡response¡£¡¡This¡¡was¡¡coming¡¡down¡¡to¡¡the¡¡very¡¡threshold¡¡of¡¡mind¡£¡¡The¡¡attempt¡¡was¡¡first¡¡made¡¡by¡¡Professor¡¡Donders¡¡in¡¡1861£»¡¡but¡¡definitive¡¡results¡¡were¡¡only¡¡obtained¡¡after¡¡many¡¡years¡¡of¡¡experiment¡¡on¡¡the¡¡part¡¡of¡¡a¡¡host¡¡of¡¡observers¡£¡¡The¡¡chief¡¡of¡¡these£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡man¡¡who¡¡has¡¡stood¡¡in¡¡the¡¡forefront¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡movement¡¡and¡¡has¡¡been¡¡its¡¡recognized¡¡leader¡¡throughout¡¡the¡¡remainder¡¡of¡¡the¡¡century£»¡¡is¡¡Dr¡£¡¡Wilhelm¡¡Wundt£»¡¡of¡¡Leipzig¡£

The¡¡task¡¡was¡¡not¡¡easy£»¡¡but£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡long¡¡run£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡accomplished¡£¡¡Not¡¡alone¡¡was¡¡it¡¡shown¡¡that¡¡the¡¡nerve¡¡centre¡¡requires¡¡a¡¡measurable¡¡time¡¡for¡¡its¡¡operations£»¡¡but¡¡much¡¡was¡¡learned¡¡as¡¡to¡¡conditions¡¡that¡¡modify¡¡this¡¡time¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡it¡¡was¡¡found¡¡that¡¡different¡¡persons¡¡vary¡¡in¡¡the¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡their¡¡central¡¡nervous¡¡activitywhich¡¡explained¡¡the¡¡¡¨personal¡¡equation¡¨¡¡that¡¡the¡¡astronomer¡¡Bessel¡¡had¡¡noted¡¡a¡¡half¡­century¡¡before¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡found£»¡¡too£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡activity¡¡varies¡¡also¡¡for¡¡the¡¡same¡¡person¡¡under¡¡different¡¡conditions£»¡¡becoming¡¡retarded£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡under¡¡influence¡¡of¡¡fatigue£»¡¡or¡¡in¡¡case¡¡of¡¡certain¡¡diseases¡¡of¡¡the¡¡brain¡£¡¡¡¡All¡¡details¡¡aside£»¡¡the¡¡essential¡¡fact¡¡emerges£»¡¡as¡¡an¡¡experimental¡¡demonstration£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡intellectual¡¡processessensation£»¡¡apperception£»¡¡volitionare¡¡linked¡¡irrevocably¡¡with¡¡the¡¡activities¡¡of¡¡the¡¡central¡¡nervous¡¡tissues£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡these¡¡activities£»¡¡like¡¡all¡¡other¡¡physical¡¡processes£»¡¡have¡¡a¡¡time¡¡element¡£¡¡¡¡To¡¡that¡¡old¡¡school¡¡of¡¡psychologists£»¡¡who¡¡scarcely¡¡cared¡¡more¡¡for¡¡the¡¡human¡¡head¡¡than¡¡for¡¡the¡¡heelsbeing¡¡interested¡¡only¡¡in¡¡the¡¡mindsuch¡¡a¡¡linking¡¡of¡¡mind¡¡and¡¡body¡¡as¡¡was¡¡thus¡¡demonstrated¡¡was¡¡naturally¡¡disquieting¡£¡¡But¡¡whatever¡¡the¡¡inferences£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡escaping¡¡the¡¡facts¡£

Of¡¡course¡¡this¡¡new¡¡movement¡¡has¡¡not¡¡been¡¡confined¡¡to¡¡Germany¡£¡¡¡¡Indeed£»¡¡it¡¡had¡¡long¡¡had¡¡exponents¡¡elsewhere¡£¡¡Thus¡¡in¡¡England£»¡¡a¡¡full¡¡century¡¡earlier£»¡¡Dr¡£¡¡Hartley¡¡had¡¡championed¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡the¡¡close¡¡and¡¡indissoluble¡¡dependence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mind¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡brain£»¡¡and¡¡formulated¡¡a¡¡famous¡¡vibration¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡association¡¡that¡¡still¡¡merits¡¡careful¡¡consideration¡£¡¡Then£»¡¡too£»¡¡in¡¡France£»¡¡at¡¡the¡¡beginning¡¡of¡¡the¡¡century£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡Dr¡£¡¡Cabanis¡¡with¡¡his¡¡tangible£»¡¡if¡¡crudely¡¡phrased£»¡¡doctrine¡¡that¡¡the¡¡brain¡¡digests¡¡impressions¡¡and¡¡secretes¡¡thought¡¡as¡¡the¡¡stomach¡¡digests¡¡food¡¡and¡¡the¡¡liver¡¡secretes¡¡bile¡£¡¡Moreover£»¡¡Herbert¡¡Spencer's¡¡Principles¡¡of¡¡Psychology£»¡¡with¡¡its¡¡avowed¡¡co¡­ordination¡¡of¡¡mind¡¡and¡¡body¡¡and¡¡its¡¡vitalizing¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡evolution£»¡¡appeared¡¡in¡¡1855£»¡¡half¡¡a¡¡decade¡¡before¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡Fechner¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡these¡¡influences£»¡¡though¡¡of¡¡vast¡¡educational¡¡value£»¡¡were¡¡theoretical¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡demonstrative£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡remains¡¡that¡¡the¡¡experimental¡¡work¡¡which¡¡first¡¡attempted¡¡to¡¡gauge¡¡mental¡¡operations¡¡by¡¡physical¡¡principles¡¡was¡¡mainly¡¡done¡¡in¡¡Germany¡£¡¡¡¡Wundt's¡¡Physiological¡¡Psychology£»¡¡with¡¡its¡¡full¡¡preliminary¡¡descriptions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡anatomy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nervous¡¡system£»¡¡gave¡¡tangible¡¡expression¡¡to¡¡the¡¡growth¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡movement¡¡in¡¡1874£»¡¡and¡¡four¡¡years¡¡later£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡opening¡¡of¡¡his¡¡laboratory¡¡of¡¡physiological¡¡psychology¡¡at¡¡the¡¡University¡¡of¡¡Leipzig£»¡¡the¡¡new¡¡psychology¡¡may¡¡be¡¡said¡¡to¡¡have¡¡gained¡¡a¡¡permanent¡¡foothold¡¡and¡¡to¡¡have¡¡forced¡¡itself¡¡into¡¡official¡¡recognition¡£¡¡From¡¡then¡¡on¡¡its¡¡conquest¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world¡¡was¡¡but¡¡a¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡time¡£

It¡¡should¡¡be¡¡noted£»¡¡however£»¡¡that¡¡there¡¡is¡¡one¡¡other¡¡method¡¡of¡¡strictly¡¡experimental¡¡examination¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mental¡¡field£»¡¡latterly¡¡much¡¡in¡¡vogue£»¡¡which¡¡had¡¡a¡¡different¡¡origin¡£¡¡This¡¡is¡¡the¡¡scientific¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡phenomena¡¡of¡¡hypnotism¡£¡¡This¡¡subject¡¡was¡¡rescued¡¡from¡¡the¡¡hands¡¡of¡¡charlatans£»¡¡rechristened£»¡¡and¡¡subjected¡¡to¡¡accurate¡¡investigation¡¡by¡¡Dr¡£¡¡James¡¡Braid£»¡¡of¡¡Manchester£»¡¡as¡¡early¡¡as¡¡1841¡£¡¡But¡¡his¡¡results£»¡¡after¡¡attracting¡¡momentary¡¡attention£»¡¡fell¡¡from¡¡view£»¡¡and£»¡¡despite¡¡desultory¡¡efforts£»¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡was¡¡not¡¡again¡¡accorded¡¡a¡¡general¡¡hearing¡¡from¡¡the¡¡scientific¡¡world¡¡until¡¡1878£»¡¡when¡¡Dr¡£¡¡Charcot¡¡took¡¡it¡¡up¡¡at¡¡the¡¡Salpetriere£»¡¡in¡¡Paris£»¡¡followed¡¡soon¡¡afterwards¡¡by¡¡Dr¡£¡¡Rudolf¡¡Heidenhain£»¡¡of¡¡Breslau£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡host¡¡of¡¡other¡¡experimenters¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡value¡¡of¡¡the¡¡method¡¡in¡¡the¡¡study¡¡of¡¡mental¡¡states¡¡was¡¡soon¡¡apparent¡£¡¡Most¡¡of¡¡Braid's¡¡experiments¡¡were¡¡repeated£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡main¡¡his¡¡results¡¡were¡¡confirmed¡£¡¡¡¡His¡¡explanation¡¡of¡¡hypnotism£»¡¡or¡¡artificial¡¡somnambulism£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡self¡­induced¡¡state£»¡¡independent¡¡of¡¡any¡¡occult¡¡or¡¡supersensible¡¡influence£»¡¡soon¡¡gained¡¡general¡¡credence¡£¡¡¡¡His¡¡belief¡¡that¡¡the¡¡initial¡¡stages¡¡are¡¡due¡¡to¡¡fatigue¡¡of¡¡nervous¡¡centres£»¡¡usually¡¡from¡¡excessive¡¡stimulation£»¡¡has¡¡not¡¡been¡¡supplanted£»¡¡though¡¡supplemented¡¡by¡¡notions¡¡growing¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡knowledge¡¡as¡¡to¡¡subconscious¡¡mentality¡¡in¡¡general£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡inhibitory¡¡influence¡¡of¡¡one¡¡centre¡¡over¡¡another¡¡in¡¡the¡¡central¡¡nervous¡¡mechanism¡£


THE¡¡BRAIN¡¡AS¡¡THE¡¡ORGAN¡¡OF¡¡MIND

These¡¡studies¡¡of¡¡the¡¡psychologists¡¡and¡¡pathologists¡¡bring¡¡the¡¡relations¡¡of¡¡mind¡¡and¡¡body¡¡into¡¡sharp¡¡relief¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡even¡¡more¡¡definite¡¡in¡¡this¡¡regard¡¡was¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡the¡¡brain¡¡physiologists¡£¡¡Chief¡¡of¡¡these£»¡¡during¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡period¡¡of¡¡the¡¡century£»¡¡was¡¡the¡¡man¡¡who¡¡is¡¡sometimes¡¡spoken¡¡of¡¡as¡¡the¡¡¡¨father¡¡of¡¡brain¡¡physiology£»¡¨¡¡Marie¡¡Jean¡¡Pierre¡¡Flourens£»¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Jardin¡¡des¡¡Plantes¡¡of¡¡Paris£»¡¡the¡¡pupil¡¡and¡¡worthy¡¡successor¡¡of¡¡Magendie¡£¡¡¡¡His¡¡experiments¡¡in¡¡nerve¡¡physiology¡¡were¡¡begun¡¡in¡¡the¡¡first¡¡quarter¡¡of¡¡the¡¡century£»¡¡but¡¡his¡¡local¡¡experiments¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡brain¡¡itself¡¡were¡¡not¡¡culminated¡¡until¡¡about¡¡1842¡£¡¡At¡¡this¡¡time¡¡the¡¡old¡¡dispute¡¡over¡¡phrenology¡¡had¡¡broken¡¡out¡¡afresh£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡studies¡¡of¡¡Flourens¡¡were¡¡aimed£»¡¡in¡¡part¡¡at¡¡least£»¡¡at¡¡the¡¡strictly¡¡scientific¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡this¡¡troublesome¡¡topic¡£

In¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡these¡¡studies¡¡Flourens¡¡discovered¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡medulla¡¡oblongata£»¡¡the¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡brain¡¡which¡¡connects¡¡that¡¡organ¡¡with¡¡the¡¡spinal¡¡cord£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡centre¡¡of¡¡minute¡¡size¡¡which¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡injured¡¡in¡¡the¡¡least¡¡without¡¡causing¡¡the¡¡instant¡¡death¡¡of¡¡the¡¡animal¡¡operated¡¡upon¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡may¡¡be¡¡added¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡this¡¡spot¡¡which¡¡is¡¡reached¡¡by¡¡the¡¡needle¡¡of¡¡the¡¡garroter¡¡in¡¡Spanish¡¡executions£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡same¡¡centre¡¡also¡¡is¡¡destroyed¡¡when¡¡a¡¡criminal¡¡is¡¡¡¨successfully¡¨¡¡hanged£»¡¡this¡¡time¡¡by¡¡the¡¡forced¡¡intrusion¡¡of¡¡a¡¡process¡¡of¡¡the¡¡second¡¡cervical¡¡vertebra¡£¡¡Flourens¡¡named¡¡this¡¡spot¡¡the¡¡¡¨vital¡¡knot¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡Its¡¡extreme¡¡importance£»¡¡as¡¡is¡¡now¡¡understood£»¡¡is¡¡due¡¡to¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡centre¡¡of¡¡nerves¡¡that¡¡supply¡¡the¡¡heart£»¡¡but¡¡this¡¡simple¡¡explanation£»¡¡annulling¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡a¡¡specific¡¡¡¨life¡¡centre£»¡¨¡¡was¡¡not¡¡at¡¡once¡¡apparent¡£

Other¡¡experiments¡¡of¡¡Flourens¡¡seemed¡¡to¡¡show¡¡that¡¡the¡¡cerebellum¡¡is¡¡the¡¡seat¡¡of¡¡the¡¡centres¡¡that¡¡co¡­ordinate¡¡muscular¡¡activities£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡higher¡¡intellectual¡¡faculties¡¡are¡¡relegated¡¡to¡¡the¡¡cerebrum¡£¡¡But¡¡beyond¡¡this£»¡¡as¡¡regards¡¡localization£»¡¡experiment¡¡faltered¡£¡¡Negative¡¡results£»¡¡as¡¡regards¡¡specific¡¡faculties£»¡¡were¡¡obtained¡¡from¡¡all¡¡localized¡¡irritations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cerebrum£»¡¡and¡¡Flourens¡¡was¡¡forced¡¡to¡¡conclude¡¡that¡¡the¡¡cerebral¡¡lobe£»¡¡while¡¡being¡¡undoubtedly¡¡the¡¡seat¡¡of¡¡higher¡¡intellection£»¡¡performs¡¡its¡¡functions¡¡with¡¡its¡¡entire¡¡structure¡£¡¡This¡¡conclusion£»¡¡which¡¡incidentally¡¡gave¡¡a¡¡quietus¡¡to¡¡phrenology£»¡¡was¡¡accepted¡¡generally£»¡¡and¡¡became¡¡the¡¡stock¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡cerebral¡¡physiology¡¡for¡¡a¡¡generation¡£

It¡¡will¡¡be¡¡seen£»¡¡however£»¡¡that¡¡these¡¡studies¡¡of¡¡Flourens¡¡had¡¡a¡¡double¡¡bearing¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡denied¡¡localization¡¡of¡¡cerebral¡¡functions£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡demonstrated¡¡the¡¡localization¡¡of¡¡certain¡¡nervous¡¡processes¡¡in¡¡other¡¡portions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡brain¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡the¡¡whole£»¡¡then£»¡¡they¡¡spoke¡¡positively¡¡for¡¡the¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡localization¡¡of¡¡function¡¡in¡¡the¡¡brain£»¡¡for¡¡which¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡number¡¡of¡¡students¡¡contended£»¡¡while¡¡their¡¡evidence¡¡against¡¡cerebral¡¡localization¡¡was¡¡only¡¡negative¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡here¡¡and¡¡there¡¡an¡¡observer¡¡who¡¡felt¡¡that¡¡this¡¡negative¡¡testimony¡¡was¡¡not¡¡conclusive¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡particular£»¡¡the¡¡German¡¡anatomist¡¡Meynert£»¡¡who¡¡had¡¡studied¡¡the¡¡disposition¡¡of¡¡nerve¡¡tracts¡¡in¡¡the¡¡cerebrum£»¡¡was¡¡led¡¡to¡¡believe¡¡that¡¡the¡¡anterior¡¡portions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cerebrum¡¡must¡¡have¡¡motor¡¡functions¡¡in¡¡preponderance£»¡¡the¡¡posterior¡¡positions£»¡¡sensory¡¡functions¡£¡¡¡¡Somewhat¡¡similar¡¡conclusions¡¡were¡¡reached¡¡also¡¡by¡¡Dr¡£¡¡Hughlings¡­Jackson£»¡¡in¡¡England£»¡¡from¡¡his¡¡studies¡¡of¡¡epileps

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ