湊徨勵弌傍利 > 哂囂窮徨慕 > biographical study of a. w. kinglake >

及12准

biographical study of a. w. kinglake-及12准

弌傍 biographical study of a. w. kinglake 忖方 耽匈4000忖

梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ● 辛指欺云匈競何
!!!!隆堋響頼紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響



inous and entangled matter察but it is not  unique amongst martial records as ;Eothen; is unique amongst books  of travel此it is through ;Eothen; that its author has soared into a  classic察and bids fair to hold his place。  And察apart from the  merit of style察great campaigns lose interest in a third察if not in  a second generation察their historical consequence effaced through  lapse of years察their policy seen to have been nugatory or  mischievous察their chronicles察swallowed greedily at the birth like  Saturn's progeny察returning to vex their parent察relegated finally  to an honourable exile in the library upper shelves察where they  hold a place eyed curiously察not invaded


;devoured As fast as they are made察forgot as soon As done。 。 。 。 To have done察is to hang Quite out of fashion察like a rusty mail察In monumental mockery。;



CHAPTER V ´ MADAME NOVIKOFF



THE Cabinet Edition of ;The Invasion of the Crimea; appeared in  1877察shortly after the Servian struggle for independence察which  aroused in England universal interest and sympathy。  Kinglake had  heard from the lips of a valued lady friend the tragic death´tale  of her brother Nicholas Kireeff察who fell fighting as a volunteer  on the side of the gallant Servian against the Turk此and察much  moved by the recital察offered to honour the memory of the dead hero  in the Preface to his forthcoming edition。  He kept his word察made  sympathetic reference to M。 Kireeff in the opening of his Preface察 but passed in pursuance of his original design to a hostile  impeachment of Russia察its people察its church察its ruler。  This was  an error of judgment and of feeling察and the lady察reading the  manuscript察indignantly desired him to burn the whole rather than  commit the outrage of associating her brother's name with an attack  on causes and personages dear to him as to herself。  Kinglake  listened in silence察then tendered to her a CRAYON ROUGE察begging  her to efface all that pained her。  She did so察and察diminished by  three´fourths of its matter察the Preface appears in Vol。 I。 of the  Cabinet Edition。  The erasure was no slight sacrifice to an author  of Kinglake's literary sensitiveness察mutilating as it did the  integrity of a carefully schemed composition察and leaving visible  the scar。  He sets forth the strongly sentimental and romantic side  of Russian temperament。  Love of the Holy Shrines begat the war of  1853察racial ardour the war of 1876。  The first was directed by a  single will察the second by national enthusiasm察yet the mind of  Nicholas was no less tossed by a breathless strife of opposing  desires and moods than was Russia at large by the struggle between  Panslavism and statesmanship。  Kinglake paints vividly the imposing  figure of the young Kireeff察his stature察beauty察bravery察the  white robe he wore incarnadined by death´wounds察his body captured  by the hateful foes。  He goes on to tell how myth rose like an  exhalation round his memory此how legends of ;a giant piling up  hecatombs by a mighty slaughter; reverberated through mansion and  cottage察town and village察cathedral and church察until thousands of  volunteers rushed to arms that they might go where young Kireeff  had gone。  Alexander's hand was forced察and the war began察which  but for England's intervention would have cleared Europe of the  Turk。  We have the text察but not the sermon察the Preface ends  abruptly with an almost clumsy peroration。

The lady who inspired both the eulogy and the curtailment was  Madame Novikoff察more widely known perhaps as O。 K。察with whom  Kinglake maintained during the last twenty years of life an  intimate and mutual friendship。  Madame Olga Novikoff察NEE Kireeff察 is a Russian lady of aristocratic rank both by parentage and  marriage。  In a lengthened sojourn at Vienna with her brother´in´ law察the Russian ambassador察she learned the current business of  diplomacy。  An eager religious propagandist察she formed alliance  with the ;Old Catholics; on the Continent察and with many among the  High Church English clergy察becoming察together with her brother  Alexander察a member of the REUNION NATIONALE察a society for the  union of Christendom。  Her interest in education has led her to  devote extensive help to school and church building and endowment  on her son's estate。  God´daughter to the Czar Nicholas察she is a  devoted Imperialist察nor less in sympathy察as were all her family察 with Russian patriotism此after the death of her brother in Servia  on July 6/18察1876察she became a still more ardent Slavophile。  The  three articles of her creed are察she says察those of her country察 Orthodoxy察Autocracy察Nationalism。  Her political aspirations have  been guided察and guided right察by her tact and goodness of heart。   Her life's aim has been to bring about a cordial understanding  between England and her native land察there is little doubt that her  influence with leading Liberal politicians察and her vigorous  allocutions in the Press察had much to do with the enthusiasm  manifested by England for the liberation of the Danubian States。   Readers of the Princess Lieven's letters to Earl Grey will recall  the part played by that able ambassadress in keeping this country  neutral through the crisis of 1828´9察to her Madame Novikoff has  been likened察and probably with truth察by the Turkish Press both  English and Continental。  She was accused in 1876 of playing on the  religious side of Mr。 Gladstone's character to secure his interest  in the Danubians as members of the Greek Church察while with  unecclesiastical people she was said to be equally skilful on the  political side察converting at the same time Anglophobe Russia by  her letters in the ;Moscow Gazette。;  Mr。 Gladstone's leanings to  Montenegro were attributed angrily in the English ;Standard; to  Madame Novikoff此 A serious statesman should know better than to  catch contagion from the petulant enthusiasm of a Russian Apostle。;   The contagion was in any case caught察and to some purpose察letter  after letter had been sent by the lady to the great statesman察then  in temporary retirement察without reply察until the last of these察 a  bitter cry of a sister for a sacrificed brother察─brought a feeling  answer from Mrs。 Gladstone察saying that her husband was deeply  moved by the appeal察and was writing on the subject。  In a few days  appeared his famous pamphlet察 Bulgarian Horrors and the Question  of the East。;

Carlyle advised that Madame Novikoff's scattered papers should be  worked into a volume察they appeared under the title ;Is Russia  Wrong拭─with a preface by Froude察the moderate and ultra´prudent  tone of which infuriated Hayward and Kinglake察as not being  sufficiently appreciative。  Hayward declared some woman had biassed  him察Kinglake was of opinion that by studying the ETAT of Queen  Elizabeth Froude had ;gone and turned himself into an old maid。;

Froude's Preface to her next work察 Russia and England察a Protest  and an Appeal察─by O。 K。察1880察was worded in a very different tone  and satisfied all her friends。  The book was also reviewed with  highest praise by Gladstone in ;The Nineteenth Century。;  Learning  that an assault upon it was contemplated in ;The Quarterly察─ Kinglake offered to supply the editor察Dr。 Smith察with materials  which might be so used as to neutralize a PERSONAL attack upon O。  K。  Smith entreated him to compose the whole article himself。  ;I  could promise you察─he writes察 that the authorship should be kept  a profound secret察─but this Kinglake seems to have thought  undesirable。  The article appeared in April察1880察under the title  of ;The Slavonic Menace to Europe。;  It opens with a panegyric on  the authoress此 She has mastered our language with conspicuous  success察she expostulates as easily as she reproaches察and she  exhibits as much facility in barbing shafts of satire as in framing  specious excuses for daring acts of diplomacy。;  It insists on the  high esteem felt for her by both the Russian and Austrian  governments察telling with much humour an anecdote of Count Beust察 the Prime Minister of Austria during her residence in Vienna。  The  Count察after meeting her at a dinner party at the Turkish Embassy察 composed a set of verses in her honour察and gave them to her察but  she forgot to mention them to her brother´in´law。  The Prime  Minister察encountering the latter察asked his opinion of the verses察 and the ambassador was greatly amazed at knowing nothing of the  matter。 23  From amenities towards the authoress察the article  passes abruptly to hostile criticism of the book察declares it to be  proscribed in Russia as mischievous察and to have precipitated a  general war by keeping up English interest in Servian rebellion。   It sneers in doubtful taste at the lady's learning


;sit non doctissima conjux察Sit nox cum somno察sit sine lite dies察


denounces the Slavs as incapable of being welded into a nation察 urging that their independence must destroy Austria´Hungary察a  consummation desired by Madame Novikoff察with her feline contempt  for ;poor dear Austria察─but which all must unite to prevent if  they would avert a European war。

How could one clear harp察men asked themselves as they read察have  produced so diverse tones拭 The riddle is solved when we

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 1 0

低辛嬬浪散議