Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > history of philosophy >

µÚ28½Ú

history of philosophy-µÚ28½Ú

С˵£º history of philosophy ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



Fall£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡serpent¡¡did¡¡not¡¡delude¡¡man£»¡¡for¡¡God¡¡said£»¡¡¡¨Behold£»¡¡Adam¡¡has¡¡become¡¡as¡¡one¡¡of
us£»¡¡to¡¡know¡¡good¡¡and¡¡evil¡£¡¨¡¡We¡¡have¡¡to¡¡deal¡¡with¡¡this¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡subjective¡¡principle¡¡and¡¡of
substance£»¡¡it¡¡constitutes¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡Mind¡¡that¡¡this¡¡individual¡¡one¡¡or¡¡independent¡¡existence¡¡of
subject¡¡should¡¡put¡¡aside¡¡its¡¡immediate¡¡character¡¡and¡¡bring¡¡itself¡¡forth¡¡as¡¡identical¡¡with¡¡the
substantial¡£¡¡Such¡¡an¡¡aim¡¡is¡¡pronounced¡¡to¡¡be¡¡the¡¡highest¡¡end¡¡attainable¡¡by¡¡man¡£¡¡We¡¡see¡¡from¡¡this
that¡¡religious¡¡ideas¡¡and¡¡speculation¡¡are¡¡not¡¡so¡¡far¡¡asunder¡¡as¡¡was¡¡at¡¡first¡¡believed£»¡¡and¡¡I¡¡maintain
these¡¡ideas¡¡in¡¡order¡¡that¡¡we¡¡may¡¡not¡¡be¡¡ashamed¡¡of¡¡them£»¡¡seeing¡¡that¡¡we¡¡still¡¡belong¡¡to¡¡them£»¡¡and
so¡¡that¡¡if¡¡we¡¡do¡¡get¡¡beyond¡¡them£»¡¡we¡¡may¡¡not¡¡be¡¡ashamed¡¡of¡¡our¡¡progenitors¡¡of¡¡the¡¡early
Christian¡¡times£»¡¡who¡¡held¡¡these¡¡ideas¡¡in¡¡such¡¡high¡¡esteem¡£

The¡¡first¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡that¡¡Philosophy¡¡which¡¡has¡¡taken¡¡its¡¡place¡¡in¡¡Christendom¡¡is¡¡thus¡¡found¡¡in¡¡the
existence¡¡of¡¡two¡¡totalities¡£¡¡This¡¡is¡¡a¡¡reduplication¡¡of¡¡substance¡¡which¡¡now£»¡¡however£»¡¡is
characterized¡¡by¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡the¡¡two¡¡totalities¡¡are¡¡no¡¡longer¡¡external¡¡to¡¡one¡¡another£»¡¡but¡¡are
clearly¡¡both¡¡required¡¡through¡¡their¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡one¡¡another¡£¡¡If¡¡formerly¡¡Stoicism¡¡and¡¡Epicureanism£»
whose¡¡negativity¡¡was¡¡Scepticism£»¡¡came¡¡forth¡¡as¡¡independent£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡finally¡¡the¡¡implicitly¡¡existent
universality¡¡of¡¡both¡¡was¡¡established£»¡¡these¡¡moments¡¡are¡¡now¡¡known¡¡as¡¡separate¡¡totalities£»¡¡and¡¡yet
in¡¡their¡¡opposition¡¡they¡¡have¡¡to¡¡be¡¡thought¡¡of¡¡as¡¡one¡£¡¡We¡¡have¡¡here¡¡the¡¡true¡¡speculative¡¡Idea£»¡¡the
Notion¡¡in¡¡its¡¡determinations£»¡¡each¡¡of¡¡which¡¡is¡¡brought¡¡into¡¡a¡¡totality¡¡and¡¡clearly¡¡relates¡¡to¡¡the¡¡other¡£
We¡¡thus¡¡have¡¡really¡¡two¡¡Ideas£»¡¡the¡¡subjective¡¡Idea¡¡as¡¡knowledge£»¡¡and¡¡then¡¡the¡¡substantial¡¡and
concrete¡¡Idea£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡development¡¡and¡¡perfection¡¡of¡¡this¡¡principle¡¡and¡¡its¡¡coming¡¡to¡¡the
consciousness¡¡of¡¡Thought£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡treated¡¡by¡¡modern¡¡Philosophy¡£¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡determinations
are¡¡in¡¡it¡¡more¡¡concrete¡¡than¡¡with¡¡the¡¡ancients¡£¡¡This¡¡opposition¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡two¡¡sides¡¡culminate£»
grasped¡¡in¡¡its¡¡widest¡¡significance£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡opposition¡¡between¡¡Thought¡¡and¡¡Being£»¡¡individuality¡¡and
substance£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡himself¡¡his¡¡freedom¡¡stands¡¡once¡¡more¡¡within¡¡the¡¡bounds¡¡of
necessity£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡opposition¡¡between¡¡subject¡¡and¡¡object£»¡¡and¡¡between¡¡Nature¡¡and¡¡Mind£»¡¡in¡¡so¡¡far
as¡¡this¡¡last¡¡as¡¡finite¡¡stands¡¡in¡¡opposition¡¡to¡¡Nature¡£

The¡¡Greek¡¡Philosophy¡¡is¡¡free¡¡from¡¡restraint¡¡because¡¡it¡¡does¡¡not¡¡yet¡¡have¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡the¡¡opposition
between¡¡Being¡¡and¡¡Thought£»¡¡but¡¡proceeds¡¡from¡¡the¡¡unconscious¡¡presupposition¡¡that¡¡Thought¡¡is
also¡¡Being¡£¡¡Certainly¡¡certain¡¡stages¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Greek¡¡Philosophy¡¡are¡¡laid¡¡hold¡¡of¡¡which¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡stand
on¡¡the¡¡same¡¡platform¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Christian¡¡philosophies¡£¡¡Thus¡¡when¡¡we¡¡see£»¡¡for¡¡instance£»¡¡in¡¡the
Philosophy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Sophists£»¡¡the¡¡new¡¡Academics£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Sceptics£»¡¡that¡¡they¡¡maintain¡¡the¡¡doctrine
that¡¡the¡¡truth¡¡is¡¡not¡¡capable¡¡of¡¡being¡¡known£»¡¡they¡¡might¡¡appear¡¡to¡¡accord¡¡with¡¡the¡¡later¡¡subjective
philosophies¡¡in¡¡asserting¡¡that¡¡all¡¡thought¡­determinations¡¡were¡¡only¡¡subjective¡¡in¡¡character£»¡¡and¡¡that
hence¡¡from¡¡these¡¡no¡¡conclusions¡¡could¡¡be¡¡arrived¡¡at¡¡as¡¡regards¡¡what¡¡is¡¡objective¡£¡¡But¡¡there¡¡is
really¡¡a¡¡difference¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡ancient¡¡philosophies£»¡¡which¡¡said¡¡that¡¡we¡¡know¡¡only¡¡the
phenomenal£»¡¡everything¡¡is¡¡confined¡¡to¡¡that£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡as¡¡regards¡¡practical¡¡life¡¡that¡¡the¡¡new¡¡Academy¡¡and
the¡¡Sceptics¡¡also¡¡admitted¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡conducting¡¡oneself¡¡rightly£»¡¡morally¡¡and¡¡rationally£»¡¡when
one¡¡adopts¡¡the¡¡phenomenal¡¡as¡¡one's¡¡rule¡¡and¡¡guide¡¡in¡¡life¡£¡¡But¡¡though¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡phenomenal¡¡that¡¡lies
at¡¡the¡¡foundation¡¡of¡¡things£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡asserted¡¡that¡¡there¡¡is¡¡likewise¡¡a¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡true¡¡and
existent£»¡¡as¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡the¡¡merely¡¡subjective¡¡idealists¡¡of¡¡a¡¡more¡¡modern¡¡day¡£¡¡Those¡¡last¡¡still
keep¡¡in¡¡the¡¡background¡¡a¡¡potentiality£»¡¡a¡¡beyond¡¡which¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡known¡¡through¡¡thought¡¡or
through¡¡conception¡£¡¡This¡¡other¡¡knowledge¡¡is¡¡an¡¡immediate¡¡knowledge¡­a¡¡faith¡¡in£»¡¡a¡¡view¡¡of£»¡¡and¡¡a
yearning¡¡after£»¡¡the¡¡beyond¡¡such¡¡as¡¡was¡¡evinced¡¡by¡¡Jacobi¡£¡¡The¡¡ancients¡¡have¡¡no¡¡such¡¡yearning£º¡¡on
the¡¡contrary£»¡¡they¡¡have¡¡perfect¡¡satisfaction¡¡and¡¡rest¡¡in¡¡the¡¡certitude¡¡that¡¡only¡¡that¡¡which¡¡appears¡¡is
for¡¡Knowledge¡£

Thus¡¡it¡¡is¡¡necessary¡¡in¡¡this¡¡respect¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡strictly¡¡to¡¡the¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡from¡¡which¡¡we¡¡start£»¡¡else
through¡¡the¡¡similarity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡results£»¡¡we¡¡come¡¡to¡¡see¡¡in¡¡that¡¡old¡¡Philosophy¡¡all¡¡the¡¡determinate
character¡¡of¡¡modern¡¡subjectivity¡£¡¡Since¡¡in¡¡the¡¡simplicity¡¡of¡¡ancient¡¡philosophy¡¡the¡¡phenomenal¡¡was
itself¡¡the¡¡only¡¡sphere£»¡¡doubts¡¡as¡¡to¡¡objective¡¡thought¡¡were¡¡not¡¡present¡¡to¡¡it¡£

The¡¡opposition¡¡defined£»¡¡the¡¡two¡¡sides¡¡of¡¡which¡¡are¡¡in¡¡modern¡¡times¡¡really¡¡related¡¡to¡¡one¡¡another
as¡¡totalities£»¡¡also¡¡has¡¡the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡an¡¡opposition¡¡between¡¡reason¡¡and¡¡faith£»¡¡between¡¡individual
perception¡¡and¡¡the¡¡objective¡¡truth¡¡which¡¡must¡¡be¡¡taken¡¡without¡¡reason¡¡of¡¡one's¡¡own£»¡¡and¡¡even
with¡¡a¡¡complete¡¡disregard¡¡for¡¡such¡¡reason¡£¡¡This¡¡is¡¡faith¡¡as¡¡understood¡¡by¡¡the¡¡church£»¡¡or¡¡faith¡¡in¡¡the
modern¡¡sense£»¡¡i¡£e¡£¡¡a¡¡rejection¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡in¡¡favour¡¡of¡¡an¡¡inward¡¡revelation£»¡¡called¡¡a¡¡direct¡¡certainty
or¡¡perception£»¡¡or¡¡an¡¡implicit¡¡and¡¡intuitive¡¡feeling¡£¡¡The¡¡opposition¡¡between¡¡this¡¡knowledge£»¡¡which
has¡¡first¡¡of¡¡all¡¡to¡¡develop¡¡itself£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡knowledge¡¡which¡¡has¡¡already¡¡developed¡¡itself¡¡inwardly£»
arouses¡¡a¡¡peculiar¡¡interest¡£¡¡In¡¡both¡¡cases¡¡the¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡thought¡¡or¡¡subjectivity¡¡and¡¡of¡¡Truth¡¡or
objectivity¡¡is¡¡manifested£»¡¡only¡¡in¡¡the¡¡first¡¡form¡¡it¡¡is¡¡said¡¡that¡¡the¡¡natural¡¡man¡¡knows¡¡the¡¡Truth¡¡since
he¡¡intuitively¡¡believes¡¡it£»¡¡while¡¡in¡¡the¡¡second¡¡form¡¡the¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡knowledge¡¡and¡¡Truth¡¡is¡¡shown£»¡¡but¡¡in
such¡¡a¡¡way¡¡that¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡raises¡¡itself¡¡above¡¡the¡¡immediate¡¡form¡¡of¡¡sensuous¡¡consciousness¡¡and
reaches¡¡the¡¡Truth¡¡first¡¡of¡¡all¡¡through¡¡Thought¡£

The¡¡final¡¡end¡¡is¡¡to¡¡think¡¡the¡¡Absolute¡¡as¡¡Mind£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Universal£»¡¡that¡¡which£»¡¡when¡¡the¡¡infinite
bounty¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Notion¡¡in¡¡its¡¡reality¡¡freely¡¡emits¡¡its¡¡determinations¡¡from¡¡itself£»¡¡wholly¡¡impresses¡¡itself
upon¡¡and¡¡imparts¡¡itself¡¡to¡¡them£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡they¡¡may¡¡be¡¡indifferently¡¡outside¡¡of¡¡or¡¡in¡¡conflict¡¡with¡¡one
another£»¡¡but¡¡so¡¡that¡¡these¡¡totalities¡¡are¡¡one¡¡only£»¡¡not¡¡alone¡¡implicitly£»¡¡£¨which¡¡would¡¡simply¡¡be¡¡our
reflection£©¡¡but¡¡explicitly¡¡identical£»¡¡the¡¡determinations¡¡of¡¡their¡¡difference¡¡being¡¡thus¡¡explicitly¡¡merely
ideal¡£¡¡Hence¡¡if¡¡the¡¡starting¡­point¡¡of¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡Philosophy¡¡can¡¡be¡¡expressed¡¡by¡¡saying¡¡that¡¡God
is¡¡comprehended¡¡as¡¡the¡¡immediate¡¡and¡¡not¡¡yet¡¡developed¡¡universality£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡its¡¡end¡­the
grasping¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Absolute¡¡as¡¡Mind¡¡through¡¡the¡¡two¡¡and¡¡a¡¡half¡¡thousand¡¡years'¡¡work¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thus¡¡far
inert¡¡world¡­spirit¡­is¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡our¡¡time£»¡¡it¡¡makes¡¡it¡¡easy¡¡for¡¡us¡¡from¡¡one¡¡determination¡¡to¡¡go¡¡on
through¡¡the¡¡manifestation¡¡of¡¡its¡¡needs£»¡¡to¡¡others¡£¡¡Yet¡¡in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡history¡¡this¡¡is¡¡difficult¡£

We¡¡thus¡¡have¡¡altogether¡¡two¡¡philosophies¡­the¡¡Greek¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Teutonic¡£¡¡As¡¡regards¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡we
must¡¡distinguish¡¡the¡¡time¡¡when¡¡Philosophy¡¡made¡¡its¡¡formal¡¡appearance¡¡as¡¡Philosophy¡¡and¡¡the
period¡¡of¡¡formation¡¡and¡¡of¡¡preparation¡¡for¡¡modern¡¡times¡£¡¡We¡¡may¡¡first¡¡begin¡¡Teutonic¡¡philosophy
where¡¡it¡¡appears¡¡in¡¡proper¡¡form¡¡as¡¡Philosophy¡£¡¡Between¡¡the¡¡first¡¡period¡¡and¡¡those¡¡more¡¡recent£»
comes£»¡¡as¡¡an¡¡intermediate¡¡period£»¡¡that¡¡fermentation¡¡of¡¡a¡¡new¡¡Philosophy¡¡which¡¡on¡¡the¡¡one¡¡side
keeps¡¡within¡¡the¡¡substantial¡¡and¡¡real¡¡existence¡¡and¡¡does¡¡not¡¡arrive¡¡at¡¡form£»¡¡while¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡side£»
it¡¡perfects¡¡Thought£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡bare¡¡form¡¡of¡¡a¡¡pre¡­supposed¡¡truth£»¡¡until¡¡it¡¡again¡¡knows¡¡itself¡¡as¡¡the¡¡free
ground¡¡and¡¡source¡¡of¡¡Truth¡£¡¡Hence¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡Philosophy¡¡falls¡¡into¡¡three¡¡periods¡­that¡¡of¡¡the
Greek¡¡Philosophy£»¡¡the¡¡Philosophy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Middle¡¡Ages¡¡and¡¡the¡¡modern¡¡Philosophy¡£¡¡Of¡¡these¡¡the
first¡¡is¡¡speaking¡¡generally£»¡¡regulated¡¡by¡¡Thought£»¡¡the¡¡second¡¡falls¡¡into¡¡the¡¡opposition¡¡between
existence¡¡and¡¡formal¡¡reflection£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡third¡¡has¡¡the¡¡Notion¡¡as¡¡its¡¡ground¡£¡¡This¡¡must¡¡not¡¡be¡¡taken
to¡¡mean¡¡that¡¡the¡¡first¡¡contains¡¡Thought¡¡alone£»¡¡it¡¡also¡¡has¡¡conceptions¡¡and¡¡ideas£»¡¡just¡¡as¡¡the¡¡latter
begins¡¡from¡¡abstract¡¡thoughts¡¡which¡¡yet¡¡constitute¡¡a¡¡duality¡£

First¡¡Period¡£¡¡¡ª¡¡This¡¡commences¡¡at¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡Thales£»¡¡about¡¡600¡¡B¡£C¡££»¡¡and¡¡goes¡¡on¡¡to¡¡the
coming¡¡to¡¡maturity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Neo¡­platonic¡¡philosophy¡¡with¡¡Plotinus¡¡in¡¡the¡¡third¡¡century£»¡¡from¡¡thence
to¡¡its¡¡further¡¡progress¡¡and¡¡development¡¡with¡¡Proclus¡¡in¡¡the¡¡fifth¡¡century¡¡until¡¡the¡¡time¡¡when¡¡all
philosophy¡¡was¡¡extinguished¡£¡¡The¡¡Neo¡­platonic¡¡philosophy¡¡then¡¡made¡¡its¡¡entrance¡¡into¡¡Christianity
later¡¡on£»¡¡and¡¡many¡¡philosophies¡¡within¡¡Christianity¡¡have¡¡this¡¡philosophy¡¡as¡¡their¡¡only¡¡groundwork¡£
This¡¡is¡¡a¡¡space¡¡of¡¡time¡¡extending¡¡to¡¡about¡¡1000¡¡years£»¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡which¡¡coincides¡¡with¡¡the
migration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nations¡¡and¡¡the¡¡decline¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Roman¡¡Empire¡£

Second¡¡Period¡£¡¡¡ª¡¡The¡¡second¡¡period¡¡is¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Middle¡¡Ages¡£¡¡The¡¡Scholastics¡¡are¡¡included
in¡¡it£»¡¡and¡¡Arabians¡¡and¡¡Jews¡¡are¡¡also¡¡historically¡¡to¡¡be¡¡noticed£»¡¡but¡¡this¡¡philosophy¡¡mainly¡¡falls
within¡¡the¡¡Christian¡¡Church¡£¡¡This¡¡period¡¡is¡¡of¡¡something¡¡over¡¡1000¡¡years'¡¡duration¡£

Third¡¡Period¡£¡¡¡ª¡¡Philosophy¡¡of¡¡modern¡¡times¡¡made¡¡its¡¡first¡¡independent¡¡appearance¡¡after¡¡the
Thirty¡¡Years'¡¡War£»¡¡with¡¡Bacon£»¡¡Jacob¡¡B£¿hm¡¡and¡¡Descartes£»¡¡it¡¡begins¡¡with¡¡the¡¡distinction
contained¡¡in£º¡¡cogito¡¡ergo¡¡sum¡£¡¡This¡¡period¡¡is¡¡one¡¡of¡¡a¡¡couple¡¡of¡¡centuries¡¡and¡¡the¡¡philosophy¡¡is
consequently¡¡still¡¡somewhat¡¡modern¡£

2¡£¡¡Sources¡¡of¡¡the¡¡History¡¡of¡¡Philosophy¡£

We¡¡have¡¡to¡¡seek¡¡for¡¡sources¡¡of¡¡another¡¡kind¡¡in¡¡this¡¡than¡¡in¡¡political¡¡history¡£¡¡There¡¡historians¡¡are

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ