Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > history of philosophy >

µÚ27½Ú

history of philosophy-µÚ27½Ú

С˵£º history of philosophy ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



have¡¡to¡¡speak¡¡of¡¡Philosophy¡¡in¡¡the¡¡territory¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Roman¡¡world£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡Romans¡¡produced¡¡no
proper¡¡Philosophy¡¡any¡¡more¡¡than¡¡any¡¡proper¡¡poets¡£¡¡They¡¡have¡¡only¡¡received¡¡from¡¡and¡¡imitated
others£»¡¡although¡¡they¡¡have¡¡often¡¡done¡¡this¡¡with¡¡intelligence£»¡¡even¡¡their¡¡religion¡¡is¡¡derived¡¡from¡¡the
Greek£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡special¡¡character¡¡that¡¡it¡¡has£»¡¡makes¡¡no¡¡approach¡¡to¡¡Philosophy¡¡and¡¡Art£»¡¡but¡¡is
unphilosophical¡¡and¡¡inartistic¡£

A¡¡further¡¡description¡¡of¡¡these¡¡two¡¡outstanding¡¡opposites¡¡must¡¡be¡¡given¡£¡¡The¡¡Greek¡¡world
developed¡¡thought¡¡as¡¡far¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Idea£»¡¡the¡¡Christian¡¡Teutonic¡¡world£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contrary£»¡¡has
comprehended¡¡Thought¡¡as¡¡Spirit£»¡¡Idea¡¡and¡¡Spirit¡¡are¡¡thus¡¡the¡¡distinguishing¡¡features¡£¡¡More
particularly¡¡the¡¡facts¡¡are¡¡as¡¡follows¡£¡¡Because¡¡God£»¡¡the¡¡still¡¡undetermined¡¡and¡¡immediate¡¡Universal£»
Being£»¡¡or¡¡objective¡¡Thought£»¡¡jealously¡¡allowing¡¡nothing¡¡to¡¡exist¡¡beside¡¡Him£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡substantial
groundwork¡¡of¡¡all¡¡Philosophy£»¡¡which¡¡never¡¡alters£»¡¡but¡¡ever¡¡sinks¡¡more¡¡deeply¡¡within¡¡itself£»¡¡and
through¡¡the¡¡development¡¡of¡¡determinations¡¡manifests¡¡itself¡¡and¡¡brings¡¡to¡¡consciousness£»¡¡we¡¡may
designate¡¡the¡¡particular¡¡character¡¡of¡¡the¡¡development¡¡in¡¡the¡¡first¡¡period¡¡of¡¡Philosophy¡¡by¡¡saying
that¡¡this¡¡development¡¡is¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡process¡¡of¡¡determinations£»¡¡figurations£»¡¡abstract¡¡qualities£»¡¡issuing
from¡¡the¡¡one¡¡ground¡¡that¡¡potentially¡¡already¡¡contains¡¡the¡¡whole¡£

The¡¡second¡¡stage¡¡in¡¡this¡¡universal¡¡principle¡¡is¡¡the¡¡gathering¡¡up¡¡of¡¡the¡¡determinations¡¡manifested
thus£»¡¡into¡¡ideal£»¡¡concrete¡¡unity£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡subjectivity¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡determinations¡¡as¡¡immediate£»
were¡¡still¡¡abstractions£»¡¡but¡¡now¡¡the¡¡Absolute£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡endlessly¡¡self¡­determining¡¡Universal£»¡¡must
furthermore¡¡be¡¡comprehended¡¡as¡¡active¡¡Thought£»¡¡and¡¡not¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Universal¡¡in¡¡this¡¡determinate
character¡£¡¡Hence¡¡it¡¡is¡¡manifested¡¡as¡¡the¡¡totality¡¡of¡¡determinations¡¡and¡¡as¡¡concrete¡¡individuality¡£
Thus£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡vo£¿s¡¡of¡¡Anaxagoras£»¡¡and¡¡still¡¡more¡¡with¡¡Socrates£»¡¡there¡¡commences¡¡a¡¡subjective
totality¡¡in¡¡which¡¡Thought¡¡grasps¡¡itself£»¡¡and¡¡thinking¡¡activity¡¡is¡¡the¡¡fundamental¡¡principle¡£

The¡¡third¡¡stage£»¡¡then£»¡¡is¡¡that¡¡this¡¡totality£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡at¡¡first¡¡abstract£»¡¡in¡¡that¡¡it¡¡becomes¡¡realized
through¡¡the¡¡active£»¡¡determining£»¡¡distinguishing¡¡thought£»¡¡sets¡¡itself¡¡forth¡¡even¡¡in¡¡the¡¡separated
determinations£»¡¡which£»¡¡as¡¡ideal£»¡¡belong¡¡to¡¡it¡£¡¡Since¡¡these¡¡determinations¡¡are¡¡contained¡¡unseparated
in¡¡the¡¡unity£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡each¡¡in¡¡it¡¡is¡¡also¡¡the¡¡other£»¡¡these¡¡opposed¡¡moments¡¡are¡¡raised¡¡into¡¡totalities¡£
The¡¡quite¡¡general¡¡forms¡¡of¡¡opposition¡¡are¡¡the¡¡universal¡¡and¡¡the¡¡particular£»¡¡or£»¡¡in¡¡another¡¡form£»
Thought¡¡as¡¡such£»¡¡external¡¡reality£»¡¡feeling¡¡or¡¡perception¡£¡¡The¡¡Notion¡¡is¡¡the¡¡identity¡¡of¡¡universal¡¡and
particular£»¡¡because¡¡each¡¡of¡¡these¡¡is¡¡thus¡¡set¡¡forth¡¡as¡¡concrete¡¡in¡¡itself£»¡¡the¡¡universal¡¡is¡¡in¡¡itself¡¡at
once¡¡the¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡universality¡¡and¡¡particularity£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡same¡¡holds¡¡good¡¡of¡¡particularity¡£¡¡Unity¡¡is
thus¡¡posited¡¡in¡¡both¡¡forms£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡abstract¡¡moments¡¡can¡¡be¡¡made¡¡complete¡¡through¡¡this¡¡unity
alone£»¡¡thus¡¡it¡¡has¡¡come¡¡to¡¡pass¡¡that¡¡the¡¡differences¡¡themselves¡¡are¡¡each¡¡raised¡¡up¡¡to¡¡a¡¡system¡¡of
totality£»¡¡which¡¡respectively¡¡confront¡¡one¡¡another¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Philosophy¡¡of¡¡Stoicism¡¡and¡¡of
Epicureanism¡£¡¡The¡¡whole¡¡concrete¡¡universal¡¡is¡¡now¡¡Mind£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡concrete¡¡individual£»
Nature¡£¡¡In¡¡Stoicism¡¡pure¡¡Thought¡¡develops¡¡into¡¡a¡¡totality£»¡¡if¡¡we¡¡make¡¡the¡¡other¡¡side¡¡from
Mind¡­natural¡¡being¡¡or¡¡feeling¡­into¡¡a¡¡totality£»¡¡Epicureanism¡¡is¡¡the¡¡result¡£¡¡Each¡¡determination¡¡is
formed¡¡into¡¡a¡¡totality¡¡of¡¡thought£»¡¡and£»¡¡in¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡the¡¡simple¡¡mode¡¡which¡¡characterizes¡¡this
sphere£»¡¡these¡¡principles¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡be¡¡for¡¡themselves¡¡and¡¡independent£»¡¡like¡¡two¡¡antagonistic¡¡systems
of¡¡Philosophy¡£¡¡Implicitly¡¡both¡¡are¡¡identical£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡themselves¡¡take¡¡up¡¡their¡¡position¡¡as
conflicting£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Idea¡¡is¡¡also£»¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is¡¡apprehended£»¡¡in¡¡a¡¡one¡­sided¡¡determinateness¡£

The¡¡higher¡¡stage¡¡is¡¡the¡¡union¡¡of¡¡these¡¡differences¡£¡¡This¡¡may¡¡occur¡¡in¡¡annihilation£»¡¡in¡¡scepticism£»¡¡but
the¡¡higher¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡is¡¡the¡¡affirmative£»¡¡the¡¡Idea¡¡in¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Notion¡£¡¡If¡¡the¡¡Notion¡¡is£»¡¡then£»
the¡¡universal¡­that¡¡which¡¡determines¡¡itself¡¡further¡¡within¡¡itself£»¡¡but¡¡yet¡¡remains¡¡there¡¡in¡¡its¡¡unity¡¡and¡¡in
the¡¡ideality¡¡and¡¡transparency¡¡of¡¡its¡¡determinations¡¡which¡¡do¡¡not¡¡become¡¡independent¡­the¡¡further
step¡¡is£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand£»¡¡the¡¡reality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Notion¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡differences¡¡are¡¡themselves¡¡brought
to¡¡totalities¡£¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡fourth¡¡stage¡¡is¡¡the¡¡union¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Idea£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡all¡¡these¡¡differences£»¡¡as
totalities£»¡¡are¡¡yet¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡blended¡¡into¡¡one¡¡concrete¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡Notion¡£¡¡This¡¡comprehension
first¡¡takes¡¡place¡¡without¡¡constraint£»¡¡since¡¡the¡¡ideal¡¡is¡¡itself¡¡only¡¡apprehended¡¡in¡¡the¡¡element¡¡of
universality¡£

The¡¡Greek¡¡world¡¡got¡¡as¡¡far¡¡as¡¡this¡¡Idea£»¡¡since¡¡they¡¡formed¡¡an¡¡ideal¡¡intellectual¡¡world£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡was
done¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Alexandrian¡¡Philosophy£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡Greek¡¡Philosophy¡¡perfected¡¡itself¡¡and¡¡reached
its¡¡end¡£¡¡If¡¡we¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡represent¡¡this¡¡process¡¡figuratively£»

A¡£¡¡Thought£»¡¡is¡¡£¨a£©¡¡speaking¡¡generally¡¡abstract£»¡¡as¡¡in¡¡universal¡¡or¡¡absolute¡¡space£»¡¡by¡¡which¡¡empty
space¡¡is¡¡often¡¡understood£»¡¡£¨b£©¡¡then¡¡the¡¡most¡¡simple¡¡space¡¡determinations¡¡appear£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡we
commence¡¡with¡¡the¡¡point¡¡in¡¡order¡¡that¡¡we¡¡may¡¡arrive¡¡at¡¡the¡¡line¡¡and¡¡angle£»¡¡£¨c£©¡¡what¡¡comes¡¡third¡¡is
their¡¡union¡¡into¡¡the¡¡triangle£»¡¡that¡¡which¡¡is¡¡indeed¡¡concrete£»¡¡but¡¡which¡¡is¡¡still¡¡retained¡¡in¡¡this¡¡abstract
element¡¡of¡¡surface£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡is¡¡only¡¡the¡¡first¡¡and¡¡still¡¡formal¡¡totality¡¡and¡¡limitation¡¡which
corresponds¡¡to¡¡the¡¡vo£¿s¡£

B¡£¡¡The¡¡next¡¡point¡¡is£»¡¡that¡¡since¡¡we¡¡allow¡¡each¡¡of¡¡the¡¡enclosing¡¡lines¡¡of¡¡the¡¡triangle¡¡to¡¡be¡¡again
surface£»¡¡each¡¡forms¡¡itself¡¡into¡¡the¡¡totality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡triangle¡¡and¡¡into¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡figure¡¡to¡¡which¡¡it
belongs£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡the¡¡realization¡¡of¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sides¡¡as¡¡we¡¡see¡¡it¡¡in¡¡Scepticism¡¡or¡¡Stoicism¡£

C¡£¡¡The¡¡last¡¡stage¡¡of¡¡all¡¡is£»¡¡that¡¡these¡¡surfaces¡¡or¡¡sides¡¡of¡¡the¡¡triangle¡¡join¡¡themselves¡¡into¡¡a¡¡body¡¡or
a¡¡totality£º¡¡the¡¡body¡¡is¡¡for¡¡the¡¡first¡¡time¡¡the¡¡perfect¡¡spatial¡¡determination£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡is¡¡a¡¡reduplication
of¡¡the¡¡triangle¡£¡¡But¡¡in¡¡as¡¡far¡¡as¡¡the¡¡triangle¡¡which¡¡forms¡¡the¡¡basis¡¡is¡¡outside¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pyramid£»¡¡this
simile¡¡does¡¡not¡¡hold¡¡good¡£

Grecian¡¡Philosophy¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Neo¡­platonists¡¡finds¡¡its¡¡end¡¡in¡¡a¡¡perfect¡¡kingdom¡¡of¡¡Thought¡¡and¡¡of
bliss£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡a¡¡potentially¡¡existent¡¡world¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ideal£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡yet¡¡unreal¡¡because¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡only
exists¡¡in¡¡the¡¡element¡¡of¡¡universality¡£¡¡This¡¡world¡¡still¡¡lacks¡¡individuality¡¡as¡¡such£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡an¡¡essential
moment¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Notion£»¡¡actuality¡¡demands¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡identity¡¡of¡¡both¡¡sides¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Idea£»¡¡the
independent¡¡totality¡¡shall¡¡be¡¡also¡¡posited¡¡as¡¡negative¡£¡¡Through¡¡this¡¡self¡­existent¡¡negation£»¡¡which¡¡is
absolute¡¡subjectivity£»¡¡the¡¡Idea¡¡is¡¡first¡¡raised¡¡into¡¡Mind¡£¡¡Mind¡¡is¡¡the¡¡subjectivity¡¡of¡¡self¡­knowledge£»
but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡only¡¡Mind¡¡inasmuch¡¡as¡¡it¡¡knows¡¡what¡¡is¡¡object¡¡to¡¡itself£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡is¡¡itself£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡totality£»¡¡and
is¡¡for¡¡itself¡¡a¡¡totality¡£¡¡That¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡the¡¡two¡¡triangles¡¡which¡¡are¡¡above¡¡and¡¡below¡¡in¡¡the¡¡prism¡¡must
not¡¡be¡¡two¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sense¡¡of¡¡being¡¡doubled£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡must¡¡be¡¡one¡¡intermingled¡¡unity¡£¡¡Or£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case
of¡¡body£»¡¡the¡¡difference¡¡arises¡¡between¡¡the¡¡centre¡¡and¡¡the¡¡peripheral¡¡parts¡£¡¡This¡¡opposition¡¡of¡¡real
corporeality¡¡and¡¡centre¡¡as¡¡the¡¡simple¡¡existence£»¡¡now¡¡makes¡¡its¡¡appearance£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡totality¡¡is¡¡the
union¡¡of¡¡the¡¡centre¡¡and¡¡the¡¡substantial¡­not£»¡¡however£»¡¡the¡¡simple¡¡union£»¡¡but¡¡a¡¡union¡¡such¡¡that¡¡the
subjective¡¡knows¡¡itself¡¡as¡¡subjective¡¡in¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡objective¡¡and¡¡substantial¡£¡¡Hence¡¡the¡¡Idea¡¡is
this¡¡totality£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Idea¡¡which¡¡knows¡¡itself¡¡is¡¡essentially¡¡different¡¡from¡¡the¡¡substantial£»¡¡the¡¡former
manifests¡¡itself¡¡independently£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡such¡¡a¡¡manner¡¡that¡¡as¡¡such¡¡it¡¡is¡¡considered¡¡to¡¡be¡¡for¡¡itself
substantial¡£¡¡The¡¡subjective¡¡Idea¡¡is¡¡at¡¡first¡¡only¡¡formal£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡real¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡the¡¡substantial
and¡¡of¡¡the¡¡potentially¡¡universal£»¡¡its¡¡end¡¡is¡¡to¡¡realize¡¡itself¡¡and¡¡to¡¡identify¡¡itself¡¡with¡¡substance¡£
Through¡¡this¡¡subjectivity¡¡and¡¡negative¡¡unity£»¡¡and¡¡through¡¡this¡¡absolute¡¡negativity£»¡¡the¡¡ideal¡¡becomes
no¡¡longer¡¡our¡¡object¡¡merely£»¡¡but¡¡object¡¡to¡¡itself£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡principle¡¡has¡¡taken¡¡effect¡¡in¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of
Christianity¡£¡¡Thus¡¡in¡¡the¡¡modern¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡is¡¡for¡¡itself¡¡free£»¡¡man¡¡is¡¡free¡¡as¡¡man£»¡¡and
from¡¡this¡¡comes¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡that¡¡because¡¡he¡¡is¡¡Mind¡¡he¡¡has¡¡from¡¡his¡¡very¡¡nature¡¡the¡¡eternal¡¡quality¡¡of
being¡¡substantial¡£¡¡God¡¡becomes¡¡known¡¡as¡¡Mind¡¡which¡¡appears¡¡to¡¡itself¡¡as¡¡double£»¡¡yet¡¡removes
the¡¡difference¡¡that¡¡it¡¡may¡¡in¡¡it¡¡be¡¡for¡¡and¡¡at¡¡home¡¡with¡¡itself¡£¡¡The¡¡business¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world£»¡¡taking¡¡it¡¡as
a¡¡whole£»¡¡is¡¡to¡¡become¡¡reconciled¡¡with¡¡Mind£»¡¡recognizing¡¡itself¡¡therein£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡business¡¡is¡¡assigned
to¡¡the¡¡Teutonic¡¡world¡£

The¡¡first¡¡beginning¡¡of¡¡this¡¡undertaking¡¡is¡¡found¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Religion¡¡which¡¡is¡¡the¡¡contemplation¡¡of¡¡and
faith¡¡in¡¡this¡¡principle¡¡as¡¡in¡¡an¡¡actual¡¡existence¡¡before¡¡a¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡principle¡¡has¡¡been¡¡arrived
at¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡Christian¡¡Religion¡¡this¡¡principle¡¡is¡¡found¡¡more¡¡as¡¡feeling¡¡and¡¡idea£»¡¡in¡¡it¡¡man¡¡as¡¡man¡¡is
destined¡¡to¡¡everlasting¡¡bliss£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡an¡¡object¡¡of¡¡divine¡¡grace£»¡¡pity¡¡and¡¡interest£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡as¡¡much¡¡as
saying¡¡that¡¡man¡¡has¡¡an¡¡absolute¡¡and¡¡infinite¡¡value¡£¡¡We¡¡find¡¡it¡¡further¡¡in¡¡that¡¡dogma¡¡revealed¡¡through
Christ¡¡to¡¡men£»¡¡of¡¡the¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡divine¡¡and¡¡human¡¡nature£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡which¡¡the¡¡subjective¡¡and
the¡¡objective¡¡Idea¡­man¡¡and¡¡God¡¡are¡¡one¡£¡¡This£»¡¡in¡¡another¡¡form£»¡¡is¡¡found¡¡in¡¡the¡¡old¡¡story¡¡of¡¡the
Fall£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡serpent¡¡did¡¡not¡¡delude¡¡man£»¡¡for¡¡God¡¡said£»¡¡¡¨B

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ