湊徨勵弌傍利 > 哂囂窮徨慕 > god the invisible king >

及6准

god the invisible king-及6准

弌傍 god the invisible king 忖方 耽匈4000忖

梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ● 辛指欺云匈競何
!!!!隆堋響頼紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響



re for the  avenger察their sexual passions and perplexities。 。 。 。 Each of these great systems of needs and efforts brings its own sort  of sediment into religion。  Each察that is to say察has its own kind  of heresy察its distinctive misapprehension of God。  It is only in  the synthesis and mutual correction of many divergent ideas that the  idea of God grows clear。  The effort to understand completely察for  example察leads to the endless Heresies of Theory。  Men trip over the  inherent infirmities of the human mind。  But in these days one does  not argue greatly about dogma。  Almost every conceivable error about  unity察about personality察about time and quantity and genus and  species察about begetting and beginning and limitation and similarity  and every kink in the difficult mind of man察has been thrust forward  in some form of dogma。  Beside the errors of thought are the errors  of emotion。  Fear and feebleness go straight to the Heresies that  God is Magic or that God is Providence察restless egotism at leisure  and unchallenged by urgent elementary realities breeds the Heresies  of Mysticism察anger and hate call for God's Judgments察and the  stormy emotions of sex gave mankind the Phallic God。  Those who find  themselves possessed by the new spirit in religion察realise very  speedily the necessity of clearing the mind of all these  exaggerations察transferences察and overflows of feeling。  The search  for divine truth is like gold washing察nothing is of any value until  most has been swept away。

2。 HERESIES OF SPECULATION

One sort of heresies stands apart from the rest。  It is infinitely  the most various sort。  It includes all those heresies which result  from wrong´headed mental elaboration察as distinguished from those  which are the result of hasty and imperfect apprehension察the  heresies of the clever rather than the heresies of the obtuse。  The  former are of endless variety and complexity察the latter are in  comparison natural察simple confusions。  The former are the errors of  the study察the latter the superstitions that spring by the wayside察 or are brought down to us in our social structure out of a barbaric  past。 To the heresies of thought and speculation belong the elaborate  doctrine of the Trinity察dogmas about God's absolute qualities察such  odd deductions as the accepted Christian teachings about the  virginity of Mary and Joseph察and the like。  All these things are  parts of orthodox Christianity。  Yet none of them did Christ察even  by the Christian account察expound or recommend。  He treated them as  negligible。  It was left for the Alexandrians察for Alexander察for  little察red´haired察busy察wire´pulling Athanasius to find out  exactly what their Master was driving at察three centuries after  their Master was dead。 。 。 。 Men still sit at little desks remote from God or life察and rack  their inadequate brains to meet fancied difficulties and state  unnecessary perfections。  They seek God by logic察ignoring the  marginal error that creeps into every syllogism。  Their conceit  blinds them to the limitations upon their thinking。  They weave  spider´like webs of muddle and disputation across the path by which  men come to God。  It would not matter very much if it were not that  simpler souls are caught in these webs。  Every great religious  system in the world is choked by such webs察each system has its own。   Of all the blood´stained tangled heresies which make up doctrinal  Christianity and imprison the mind of the western world to´day察not  one seems to have been known to the nominal founder of Christianity。   Jesus Christ never certainly claimed to be the Messiah察never spoke  clearly of the Trinity察was vague upon the scheme of salvation and  the significance of his martyrdom。  We are asked to suppose that he  left his apostles without instructions察that were necessary to their  eternal happiness察that he could give them the Lord's Prayer but  leave them to guess at the all´important Creed* and that the Church  staggered along blindly察putting its foot in and out of damnation察 until the ;experts; of Nicaea察that ;garland of priests察─marshalled  by Constantine's officials察came to its rescue。 。 。 。  From the  conversion of Paul onward察the heresies of the intellect multiplied  about Christ's memory and hid him from the sight of men。  We are no  longer clear about the doctrine he taught nor about the things he  said and did。 。 。 。 * Even the ;Apostles' Creed; is not traceable earlier than the  fourth century。  It is manifestly an old察patched formulary。   Rutinius explains that it was not written down for a long time察but  transmitted orally察kept secret察and used as a sort of password  among the elect。 We are all so weary of this theology of the Christians察we are all  at heart so sceptical about their Triune God察that it is needless  here to spend any time or space upon the twenty thousand different  formulae in which the orthodox have attempted to believe in  something of the sort。  There are several useful encyclopaedias of  sects and heresies察compact察but still bulky察to which the curious  may go。  There are ten thousand different expositions of orthodoxy。   No one who really seeks God thinks of the Trinity察either the  Trinity of the Trinitarian or the Trinity of the Sabellian or the  Trinity of the Arian察any more than one thinks of those theories  made stone察those gods with three heads and seven hands察who sit on  lotus leaves and flourish lingams and what not察in the temples of  India。  Let us leave察therefore察these morbid elaborations of the  human intelligence to drift to limbo察and come rather to the natural  heresies that spring from fundamental weaknesses of the human  character察and which are common to all religions。  Against these it  is necessary to keep constant watch。  They return very insidiously。

3。 GOD IS NOT MAGIC

One of the most universal of these natural misconceptions of God is  to consider him as something magic serving the ends of men。 It is not easy for us to grasp at first the full meaning of giving  our souls to God。  The missionary and teacher of any creed is all  too apt to hawk God for what he will fetch察he is greedy for the  poor triumph of acquiescence察and so it comes about that many people  who have been led to believe themselves religious察are in reality  still keeping back their own souls and trying to use God for their  own purposes。  God is nothing more for them as yet than a  magnificent Fetish。  They did not really want him察but they have  heard that he is potent stuff察their unripe souls think to make use  of him。  They call upon his name察they do certain things that are  supposed to be peculiarly influential with him察such as saying  prayers and repeating gross praises of him察or reading in a blind察 industrious way that strange miscellany of Jewish and early  Christian literature察the Bible察and suchlike mental mortification察 or making the Sabbath dull and uncomfortable。  In return for these  fetishistic propitiations God is supposed to interfere with the  normal course of causation in their favour。  He becomes a celestial  log´roller。  He remedies unfavourable accidents察cures petty  ailments察contrives unexpected gifts of medicine察money察or the  like察he averts bankruptcies察arranges profitable transactions察and  does a thousand such services for his little clique of faithful  people。  The pious are represented as being constantly delighted by  these little surprises察these bouquets and chocolate boxes from the  divinity。  Or contrawise he contrives spiteful turns for those who  fail in their religious attentions。  He murders Sabbath´breaking  children察or disorganises the careful business schemes of the  ungodly。  He is represented as going Sabbath´breakering on Sunday  morning as a Staffordshire worker goes ratting。  Ordinary everyday  Christianity is saturated with this fetishistic conception of God。   It may be disowned in THE HIBBERT JOURNAL察but it is unblushingly  advocated in the parish magazine。  It is an idea taken over by  Christianity with the rest of the qualities of the Hebrew God。  It  is natural enough in minds so self´centred that their recognition of  weakness and need brings with it no real self´surrender察but it is  entirely inconsistent with the modern conception of the true God。 There has dropped upon the table as I write a modest periodical  called THE NORTHERN BRITISH ISRAEL REVIEW察illustrated with  portraits of various clergymen of the Church of England察and of  ladies and gentlemen who belong to the little school of thought  which this magazine represents察it is察I should judge察a sub´sect  entirely within the Established Church of England察that is to say  within the Anglican communion of the Trinitarian Christians。  It  contains among other papers a very entertaining summary by a  gentleman entitledI cite the unusual title´page of the periodical ;Landseer Mackenzie察Esq。察─of the views of Isaiah察Ezekiel察and  Obadiah upon the Kaiser William。  They are distinctly hostile views。   Mr。 Landseer Mackenzie discourses not only upon these anticipatory  condemnations but also upon the relations of the weather to this  war。  He is convinced quite simply and honestly that God has been  persistently rigging the weather against the German

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 0 0

低辛嬬浪散議