shorter logic-及55准
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
as it is by outward circumstances ´ the complex changes in configuration and grouping of clouds��
and the like ´ ought not to be ranked higher than the equally casual fancies of the mind which
surrenders itself to its own caprices。 The wonderment with which such phenomena are welcomed
is a most abstract frame of mind�察�from which one should advance to a closer insight into the inner
harmony and uniformity of nature。
�拭�
Of contingency in respect of the Will it is especially important to form a proper estimate。 The
Freedom of the Will is an expression that often means mere free choice�察�or the will in the form of
contingency。 Freedom of choice�察�or the capacity for determining ourselves towards one thing or
another�察�or is undoubtedly a vital element in the will ��which is in its very notion free���察�but instead of
being freedom itself�察�it is it is only in the first instance a freedom in form。 The genuinely free will��
which includes free choice as suspended�察�is conscious to itself that its content is intrinsically firm
and fast�察�and knows it at the same time to be thoroughly its own。 A will�察�on the contrary�察�which
remains standing on the grade of option�察�even supposing it does decide in favour of what is in
import right and true�察�is always haunted by the conceit that it might�察�if it had so pleased�察�have
decided in favour of the reverse course。 When more narrowly examined�察�free choice is seen to be
a contradiction�察�to this extent�察�that its form and content stand in antithesis。 The matter of choice is
given�察�and known as a content dependent not on the will itself�察�but on outward circumstances。 In
reference to such a given content�察�freedom lies only in the form of choosing�察�which�察�as it is only a
freedom in form�察�may consequently be regarded as freedom only in supposition。 On an ultimate
analysis it will be seen that the same outwardness of circumstances�察�on which is founded the
content that the will finds to its hand�察�can alone account for the will giving its decision for the one
and not the other of the two alternatives。
Although contingency�察�as it has thus been shown�察�is only one aspect in the whole of actuality�察�and
therefore not to be mistaken for the whole of actuality�察�and therefore not to be mistaken for
actuality itself�察�it has no less than the rest of the forms of the idea its due office in the world of
objects。 This is�察�in the first place�察�seen in Nature。 On the surface of Nature�察�so to speak�察�Chance
ranges unchecked�察�and the contingency must simply be recognised�察�without the pretension
sometimes erroneously ascribed to philosophy�察�in seeking to find it in a
could´only´be´so´and´not´otherwise。 Nor is contingency less visible in the world of Mind。 The
Will�察�as we have already remarked�察�includes contingency under the shape of option or free choice��
but only as a vanishing and abrogated element。 In respect of Mind and its works�察�just as in the
case of Nature�察�we must guard against being so far misled by a well´meant endeavour after
rational knowledge�察�as to try to exhibit the necessity of phenomena which are marked by a
decided contingency�察�or�察�as the phrase is�察�to construe them a priori。 Thus in language ��although it
be�察�as it were�察�the body of thought�� Chance still unquestionably plays a decided part�察�and the same
is true of the creations of law�察�of art�察�etc。
The problem of science�察�and especially of philosophy�察�undoubtedly consists in eliciting the
necessity concealed under the semblance of contingency。 That�察�however�察�is far from meaning that
the contingent belongs to our subjective conception alone�察�and must therefore be simply set aside��
if we wish to get at the truth。 All scientific researches which pursue this tendency exclusively lay
themselves open to the charge of mere jugglery and an over´strained precisionism。
′ 146
Condition
When more closely examined�察�what the aforesaid outward side of actuality
implies is this。 Contingency�察�which is actuality in its immediacy�察�is the
self´identical�察�essentially only as a supposition which is no sooner made than it is
revoked and leaves an existent externality。 In this way�察�the external contingency is
something pre´supposed�察�the immediate existence of which is at the same time a
possibility�察�and has the vocation to be suspended�察�to be the possibility of
something else。 Now this possibility is the Condition。
′ 146n
The Contingent�察�as the immediate actuality�察�is at the same time�察�the possibility of somewhat else ´
no longer however�察�the abstract possibility which we had at first�察�but the possibility which is。 And
a possibility existent is a Condition。 By the Condition of a thing we mean first�察�an existence�察�in
short an immediate�察�and secondly the vocation of this immediate to be suspended and subserve the
actualising of something else。 Immediate actuality is in general as such never what it ought to be�察�it
is a finite actuality with an inherent flaw�察�and its vocation is to be consumed。 But the other aspect
of actuality is its essentiality。 This is primarily the inside which as a mere possibility is no less
destined to be suspended。 Possibility thus suspended is the issuing of a new actuality�察�of which the
first immediate actuality was the pre´supposition。 Here we see the alternation which is involved in
the notion of a Condition。 The Conditions of a thing seem at first sight to involve no bias any way。
Really however�察�an immediate actuality of this kind includes in it the germ of something else
altogether。 At first�察�this something else is only a possibility�此�but the form of possibility is soon
suspended and translated into actuality。 This new actuality thus issuing is the very inside of the
immediate actuality which uses it up。 Thus�察�there comes into being quite another shape of things��
and yet it is not an other�此�for the first actuality is only put as what it in essence was。 The conditions
which are sacrificed�察�which feel to the ground and are spent�察�only unite with themselves in the other
actuality。 Such in general is the nature of the process of actuality。 The actual is no mere case of
immediate Being�察�but�察�as essential Being�察�a suspension of its own immediacy�察�and thereby
mediating itself with itself。
′ 147
��c�А�Real Possibility
When this externality ��of actuality�� is thus developed into a circle of the two
categories of possibility and immediate actuality�察�showing the intermediation of
the one by the other�察�it is what is called Real Possibility。 Being such a circle��
further�察�it is the totality�察�and thus the content�察�the actual fact or affair in its
all´round definiteness。 While in like manner�察�if we look at the distinction between
the two characteristics in this unity�察�it realises the concrete totality of the form��
the immediate self´translation of inner into outer�察�and of outer into inner。 This
self´movement of the form is Activity�察�carrying into effect the fact or affair as a
real ground which is self´suspended to actuality�察�and carrying into effect the
contingent actuality�察�the conditions�察�i。e。 it is their reflection´into´self�察�and their
self´suspension to another actuality of the actual fact。 If all the conditions are at
hand�察�the fact ��event�� must be actual�察�and the fact itself is one of the conditions��
for being in the first place only inner�察�it is in fact itself only pre´supposed。
Developed actuality�察�as the coincident alternation of inner and outer�察�the
alternation of their opposite motions combined into a single motion�察�is Necessity。
Necessity
Necessity has been defined�察�and rightly so�察�as the union of possibility and
actuality。 This mode of expression�察�however�察�gives a superficial and therefore
unintelligible description of the very difficult notion of necessity。 It is difficult
because it is the notion itself�察�only that its stages or factors are still as actualities��
which are yet at the same time to be viewed as forms only�察�collapsing and
transient。 In the two following paragraphs�察�therefore�察�an exposition of the factors
which constitute necessity must be given at greater length。
′ 147n
Blind Necessity
When anything is said to be necessary�察�the first question we ask is�此�Why�拭�Anything necessary
accordingly comes before us as something due to a supposition�察�the result of certain antecedents。
If we go no further than mere derivation from antecedents�察�however�察�we have not gained a
complete notion of what necessity means。 What is merely derivative�察�is what it is�察�not through itself��
but through something else�此�and in this way�察�it too is merely contingent。 What is necessary on the
other hand�察�we would have to be what it is through itself�此�and thus�察�although derivative�察�it must still
contain the antecedent whence it is derived as a vanishing element in itself。 Hence we say of what
is necessary�察�'It is'。 We thus hold it to be simple�察�self´relation�察�in which all dependence on
something else is removed。
Necessity is often said to be blind。 If that means that in the process of necessit