a history of science-4-第13节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
on the subject before the Royal Society； and soon afterwards the efforts of Herschel and numerous other natural philosophers contributed to the advancement of the new method。
In 1843 Dr。 John W。 Draper； the famous English…American chemist and physiologist； showed that by photography the Fraunhofer lines in the solar spectrum might be mapped with absolute accuracy； also proving that the silvered film revealed many lines invisible to the unaided eye。 The value of this method of observation was recognized at once； and； as soon as the spectroscope was perfected； the photographic method； in conjunction with its use； became invaluable to the chemist。 By this means comparisons of spectra may be made with a degree of accuracy not otherwise obtainable； and； in case of the stars； whole clusters of spectra may be placed on record at a single observation。
As the examination of the sun and stars proceeded； chemists were amazed or delighted； according to their various preconceptions； to witness the proof that many familiar terrestrial elements are to be found in the celestial bodies。 But what perhaps surprised them most was to observe the enormous preponderance in the sidereal bodies of the element hydrogen。 Not only are there vast quantities of this element in the sun's atmosphere； but some other suns appeared to show hydrogen lines almost exclusively in their spectra。 Presently it appeared that the stars of which this is true are those white stars； such as Sirius； which had been conjectured to be the hottest； whereas stars that are only red…hot； like our sun； show also the vapors of many other elements； including iron and other metals。
In 1878 Professor J。 Norman Lockyer； in a paper before the Royal Society； called attention to the possible significance of this series of observations。 He urged that the fact of the sun showing fewer elements than are observed here on the cool earth； while stars much hotter than the sun show chiefly one element； and that one hydrogen； the lightest of known elements； seemed to give color to the possibility that our alleged elements are really compounds； which at the temperature of the hottest stars may be decomposed into hydrogen； the latter 〃element〃 itself being also doubtless a compound； which might be resolved under yet more trying conditions。
Here； then； was what might be termed direct experimental evidence for the hypothesis of Prout。 Unfortunately； however； it is evidence of a kind which only a few experts are competent to discussso very delicate a matter is the spectral analysis of the stars。 What is still more unfortunate； the experts do not agree among themselves as to the validity of Professor Lockyer's conclusions。 Some； like Professor Crookes； have accepted them with acclaim； hailing Lockyer as 〃the Darwin of the inorganic world；〃 while others have sought a different explanation of the facts he brings forward。 As yet it cannot be said that the controversy has been brought to final settlement。 Still； it is hardly to be doubted that now； since the periodic law has seemed to join hands with the spectroscope； a belief in the compound nature of the so…called elements is rapidly gaining ground among chemists。 More and more general becomes the belief that the Daltonian atom is really a compound radical； and that back of the seeming diversity of the alleged elements is a single form of primordial matter。 Indeed； in very recent months； direct experimental evidence for this view has at last come to hand； through the study of radio…active substances。 In a later chapter we shall have occasion to inquire how this came about。
IV。 ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
ALBRECHT VON HALLER
An epoch in physiology was made in the eighteenth century by the genius and efforts of Albrecht von Haller （1708…1777）； of Berne； who is perhaps as worthy of the title 〃The Great〃 as any philosopher who has been so christened by his contemporaries since the time of Hippocrates。 Celebrated as a physician； he was proficient in various fields； being equally famed in his own time as poet； botanist； and statesman； and dividing his attention between art and science。
As a child Haller was so sickly that he was unable to amuse himself with the sports and games common to boys of his age； and so passed most of his time poring over books。 When ten years of age he began writing poems in Latin and German； and at fifteen entered the University of Tubingen。 At seventeen he wrote learned articles in opposition to certain accepted doctrines； and at nineteen he received his degree of doctor。 Soon after this he visited England； where his zeal in dissecting brought him under suspicion of grave…robbery； which suspicion made it expedient for him to return to the Continent。 After studying botany in Basel for some time he made an extended botanical journey through Switzerland； finally settling in his native city； Berne； as a practising physician。 During this time he did not neglect either poetry or botany； publishing anonymously a collection of poems。
In 1736 he was called to Gottingen as professor of anatomy； surgery； chemistry； and botany。 During his labors in the university he never neglected his literary work； sometimes living and sleeping for days and nights together in his library； eating his meals while delving in his books； and sleeping only when actually compelled to do so by fatigue。 During all this time he was in correspondence with savants from all over the world； and it is said of him that he never left a letter of any kind unanswered。
Haller's greatest contribution to medical science was his famous doctrine of irritability； which has given him the name of 〃father of modern nervous physiology；〃 just as Harvey is called 〃the father of the modern physiology of the blood。〃 It has been said of this famous doctrine of irritability that 〃it moved all the minds of the centuryand not in the departments of medicine alonein a way of which we of the present day have no satisfactory conception； unless we compare it with our modern Darwinism。〃＇1＇
The principle of general irritability had been laid down by Francis Glisson （1597…1677） from deductive studies； but Haller proved by experiments along the line of inductive methods that this irritability was not common to all 〃fibre as well as to the fluids of the body；〃 but something entirely special； and peculiar only to muscular substance。 He distinguished between irritability of muscles and sensibility of nerves。 In 1747 he gave as the three forces that produce muscular movements： elasticity； or 〃dead nervous force〃； irritability； or 〃innate nervous force〃； and nervous force in itself。 And in 1752 he described one hundred and ninety experiments for determining what parts of the body possess 〃irritability〃that is； the property of contracting when stimulated。 His conclusion that this irritability exists in muscular substance alone and is quite independent of the nerves proceeding to it aroused a controversy that was never definitely settled until late in the nineteenth century； when Haller's theory was found to be entirely correct。
It was in pursuit of experiments to establish his theory of irritability that Haller made his chief discoveries in embryology and development。 He proved that in the process of incubation of the egg the first trace of the heart of the chick shows itself in the thirty…eighth hour； and that the first trace of red blood showed in the forty…first hour。 By his investigations upon the lower animals he attempted to confirm the theory that since the creation of genus every individual is derived from a preceding individualthe existing theory of preformation； in which he believed； and which taught that 〃every individual is fully and completely preformed in the germ； simply growing from microscopic to visible proportions； without developing any new parts。〃
In physiology； besides his studies of the nervous system； Haller studied the mechanism of respiration； refuting the teachings of Hamberger （1697…1755）； who maintained that the lungs contract independently。 Haller； however； in common with his contemporaries； failed utterly to understand the true function of the lungs。 The great physiologist's influence upon practical medicine； while most profound； was largely indirect。 He was a theoretical rather than a practical physician； yet he is credited with being the first physician to use the watch in counting the pulse。
BATTISTA MORGAGNI AND MORBID ANATOMY
A great contemporary of Haller was Giovanni Battista Morgagni （1682…1771）； who pursued what Sydenham had neglected； the investigation in anatomy； thus supplying a necessary counterpart to the great Englishman's work。 Morgagni's investigations were directed chiefly to the study of morbid anatomythe study of the structure of diseased tissue； both during life and post mortem； in contrast to the normal anatomical structures。 This work cannot be said to have originated with him； for as early as 1679 Bonnet had made similar； although less extensive； studies； and later many investigators； such as Lancisi and Haller； had made post…mortem studies。 But Morgagni's De sedibus et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis was the largest； most accurate； and best…illustrated collection of cases th
