太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > the six enneads >

第143节

the six enneads-第143节

小说: the six enneads 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



y。 If motion were equally inherent in its constitution; we should include this as well; and the four would form a unity; the single body depending upon them all for its unity and characteristic nature。     The same method must be applied in examining the Intellectual Substance and the genera and first…principles of the Intellectual sphere。     But we must begin by subtracting what is peculiar to body; its coming…to…be; its sensible nature; its magnitude… that is to say; the characteristics which produce isolation and mutual separation。 It is an Intellectual Being we have to consider; an Authentic Existent; possessed of a unity surpassing that of any sensible thing。     Now the wonder comes how a unity of this type can be many as well as one。 In the case of body it was easy to concede unity…with…plurality; the one body is divisible to infinity; its colour is a different thing from its shape; since in fact they are separated。 But if we take Soul; single; continuous; without extension; of the highest simplicity… as the first effort of the mind makes manifest… how can we expect to find multiplicity here too? We believed that the division of the living being into body and soul was final: body indeed was manifold; composite; diversified; but in soul we imagined we had found a simplex; and boldly made a halt; supposing that we had come to the limit of our course。     Let us examine this soul; presented to us from the Intellectual realm as body from the Sensible。 How is its unity a plurality? How is its plurality a unity? Clearly its unity is not that of a composite formed from diverse elements; but that of a single nature comprising a plurality。     This problem attacked and solved; the truth about the genera comprised in Being will thereby; as we asserted; be elucidated also。     5。 A first point demanding consideration:     Bodies… those; for example; of animals and plants… are each a multiplicity founded on colour and shape and magnitude; and on the forms and arrangement of parts: yet all these elements spring from a unity。 Now this unity must be either Unity…Absolute or some unity less thorough…going and complete; but necessarily more complete than that which emerges; so to speak; from the body itself; this will be a unity having more claim to reality than the unity produced from it; for divergence from unity involves a corresponding divergence from Reality。 Since; thus; bodies take their rise from unity; but not 〃unity〃 in the sense of the complete unity or Unity…Absolute… for this could never yield discrete plurality… it remains that they be derived from a unity Pluralized。 But the creative principle 'in bodies' is Soul: Soul therefore is a pluralized unity。     We then ask whether the plurality here consists of the Reason…Principles of the things of process。 Or is this unity not something different from the mere sum of these Principles? Certainly Soul itself is one Reason…Principle; the chief of the Reason…Principles; and these are its Act as it functions in accordance with its essential being; this essential being; on the other hand; is the potentiality of the Reason…Principles。 This is the mode in which this unity is a plurality; its plurality being revealed by the effect it has upon the external。     But; to leave the region of its effect; suppose we take it at the higher non…effecting part of Soul; is not plurality of powers to be found in this part also? The existence of this higher part will; we may presume; be at once conceded。     But is this existence to be taken as identical with that of the stone? Surely not。 Being in the case of the stone is not Being pure and simple; but stone…being: so here; Soul's being denotes not merely Being but Soul…being。     Is then that 〃being〃 distinct from what else goes to complete the essence 'or substance' of Soul? Is it to be identified with Bring 'the Absolute'; while to some differentia of Being is ascribed the production of Soul? No doubt Soul is in a sense Being; and this is not as a man 〃is〃 white; but from the fact of its being purely an essence: in other words; the being it possesses it holds from no source external to its own essence。     6。 But must it not draw on some source external to its essence; if it is to be conditioned; not only by Being; but by being an entity of a particular character? But if it is conditioned by a particular character; and this character is external to its essence; its essence does not comprise all that makes it Soul; its individuality will determine it; a part of Soul will be essence; but not Soul entire。     Furthermore; what being will it have when we separate it from its other components? The being of a stone? No: the being must be a form of Being appropriate to a source; so to speak; and a first…principle; or rather must take the forms appropriate to all that is comprised in Soul's being: the being here must; that is; be life; and the life and the being must be one。     One; in the sense of being one Reason…Principle? No; it is the substrate of Soul that is one; though one in such a way as to be also two or more… as many as are the Primaries which constitute Soul。 Either; then; it is life as well as Substance; or else it possesses life。     But if life is a thing possessed; the essence of the possessor is not inextricably bound up with life。 If; on the contrary; this is not possession; the two; life and Substance; must be a unity。     Soul; then; is one and many… as many as are manifested in that oneness… one in its nature; many in those other things。 A single Existent; it makes itself many by what we may call its motion: it is one entire; but by its striving; so to speak; to contemplate itself; it is a plurality; for we may imagine that it cannot bear to be a single Existent; when it has the power to be all that it in fact is。 The cause of its appearing as many is this contemplation; and its purpose is the Act of the Intellect; if it were manifested as a bare unity; it could have no intellection; since in that simplicity it would already be identical with the object of its thought。     7。 What; then; are the several entities observable in this plurality?     We have found Substance 'Essence' and life simultaneously present in Soul。 Now; this Substance is a common property of Soul; but life; common to all souls; differs in that it is a property of Intellect also。     Having thus introduced Intellect and its life we make a single genus of what is common to all life; namely; Motion。 Substance and the Motion; which constitutes the highest life; we must consider as two genera; for even though they form a unity; they are separable to thought which finds their unity not a unity; otherwise; it could not distinguish them。     Observe also how in other things Motion or life is clearly separated from Being… a separation impossible; doubtless; in True Being; but possible in its shadow and namesake。 In the portrait of a man much is left out; and above all the essential thing; life: the 〃Being〃 of sensible things just such a shadow of True Being; an abstraction from that Being complete which was life in the Archetype; it is because of this incompleteness that we are able in the Sensible world to separate Being from life and life from Being。     Being; then; containing many species; has but one genus。 Motion; however; is to be classed as neither a subordinate nor a supplement of Being but as its concomitant; for we have not found Being serving as substrate to Motion。 Motion is being Act; neither is separated from the other except in thought; the two natures are one; for Being is inevitably actual; not potential。     No doubt we observe Motion and Being separately; Motion as contained in Being and Being as involved in Motion; and in the individual they may be mutually exclusive; but the dualism is an affirmation of our thought only; and that thought sees either form as a duality within a unity。     Now Motion; thus manifested in conjunction with Being; does not alter Being's nature… unless to complete its essential character… and it does retain for ever its own peculiar nature: at once; then; we are forced to introduce Stability。 To reject Stability would be more unreasonable than to reject Motion; for Stability is associated in our thought and conception with Being even more than with Motion; unalterable condition; unchanging mode; single Reason…Principle… these are characteristics of the higher sphere。     Stability; then; may also be taken as a single genus。 Obviously distinct from Motion and perhaps even its contrary; that it is also distinct from Being may be shown by many considerations。 We may especially observe that if Stability were identical with Being; so also would Motion be; with equal right。 Why identity in the case of Stability and not in that of Motion; when Motion is virtually the very life and Act both of Substance and of Absolute Being? However; on the very same principle on which we separated Motion from Being with the understanding that it is the same and not the same… that they are two and yet one… we also separate Stability from Being; holding it; yet; inseparable; it is only a logical separation entailing the inclusion among the Existents of this other genus。 To identify Stability with Being; with no difference between them; and to identify Bei

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 1 0

你可能喜欢的