criminal psychology-第81节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
So again； he reduces much supposed to have been heard； to things that have been read。 Novels may make such an impression that what has been read or described there appears to have been really experienced。 A name or region then seems to be familiar because we have read of something similar。
It will perhaps be proper not to reduce all the phenomena of paramnesia to the same conditions。 Only a limited number of them seem to be so reducible。 Impressions often occur which one is inclined to attribute to illusory memory； merely to discover later that they were real but unconscious memory； the things had been actually experienced and the events had been forgotten。 So； for example； I visit some region for the first time and get the impression that I have seen it before； and since this； as a matter of fact； is not the case； I believe myself to have suffered from an illusion of memory。 Later； I perceive that perhaps in early childhood I had really been in a country that resembled this one。 Thus my memory was really correct； I had merely forgotten the experience to which it referred。
Aside from these unreal illusions of memory； many； if not all others； are explicable； as Sully indicates； by the fact that something similar to what has been experienced； has been read or heard； while the fact that it has been read or heard is half forgotten or has sunk into the subconsciousness。 Only the sensation has remained； not the recollection that it was read； etc。 Another part of this phenomenon may possibly be explained by vivid dreams； which also leave strong impressions without leaving the memory of their having been dreams。 Whoever is in the habit of dreaming vividly will know how it is possible to have for days a clear or cloudy feeling of the discovery of something excellent or disturbing； only to find out later that there has been no real experience； only a dream。 Such a feeling； especially the memory of things seen or heard in dreams； may remain in consciousness。 If； later； some similar matter is really met with； the sensation may appear as a past event。＇1＇ This is all the easier since dreams are never completely rigid； but easily modeled and adaptable； so that if there is the slightest approximation to similarity； memory of a dream lightly attaches itself to real experience。
＇1＇ H Gross's Archiv I； 261； 335。
All this may happen to anybody； well or ill； nervous or stolid。 Indeed； Krpelin asserts that paramnesia occurs only under normal circumstances。 It may also be generally assumed that a certain fatigued condition of the mind or of the body renders this occurrence more likely； if it does not altogether determine it。 So far as self… observation throws any light on the matter； this statement appears to be correct。 I had such illusions of memory most numerously during the Bosnian war of occupation of 1878； when we made our terrible forced marches from Esseg to Sarajevo。 The illusions appeared regularly after dinner； when we were quite tired。 Then the region which all my preceding life I had not seen； appeared to be pleasantly familiar； and when once； at the very beginning； I received the order to storm a village occupied by Turks； I thought it would not be much trouble； I had done it so frequently and nothing had ever happened。 At that time we were quite exhausted。 Even when we had entered the otherwise empty village this extraordinary circumstance did not impress me； and I thought that the inside of a village always looked like thatalthough I had never before seen such a Turkish street…hotel ‘‘in nature'' or pictured。
Another mode of explanation may be mentioned； i。 e。； explanation by heredity。 Hering＇1＇ and Sully have dealt with it。 According to the latter； especially； we may think that we have undergone some experience that really belongs to some ancestor。 Sully believes that this contention can not be generically contradicted because a group of skilled activities （nest…building； food…seeking； hiding from the enemy； migration； etc。） have been indubitably inherited from the animals； but on the other hand； that paramnesia is inherited memory can be proved only with； e。 g。； a child which had been brought up far from the sea but whose parents and grandparents had been coast…dwellers。 If that child should at first sight have the feeling that he is familiar with the sea； the inheritance of memory would be proved。 So long as we have not a larger number of such instances the assumption of hereditary influence is very suggestive but only probable。
＇1＇ E。 Hering： ber das Gedchtnis； etc。 Vienna 1876。
With regard to the bearing of memory…illusions on criminal cases I shall cite only one possible instance。 Somebody just waking from sleep has perceived that his servant is handling his purse which is lying on the night…table； and in consequence of the memory…illusion he believes that he has already observed this many times before。 The action of the servant was perhaps harmless and in no way directed toward theft。 Now the evidence of the master is supposed to demonstrate that this has repeatedly occurred； then perhaps no doubt arises that the servant has committed theft frequently and has had the intention of doing so this time。
To generalize this situation would be to indicate that illusions of memory are always likely to have doubtful results when they have occurred only once and when the witness in consequence of paramnesia believes the event to have been repeatedly observed。 It is not difficult to think of numbers of such cases but it will hardly be possible to say how the presence of illusions of memory is to be discovered without the knowledge _*that_ they exist。
When we consider all the qualities and idiosyncrasies of memory； this so varied function of the mind； we must wonder that its estimation in special cases is frequently different； although proceeding from a second person or from the very owner of the questionable memory。 Sully finds rightly； that one of the keenest tricks in fighting deep… rooted convictions is to attack the memory of another with regard to its reliability。 Memory is the private domain of the individual。 From the secret council…chamber of his own consciousness； into which no other may enter； it draws all its values。
The case is altered； however； when a man speaks of his personal memory。 It must then assume all the deficiencies which belong to other mental powers。 We lawyers； especially； hear frequently from witnesses： ‘‘My memory is too weak to answer this question；'' ‘‘Since receiving the wound in question my memory has failed；'' ‘‘I am already too old； my memory is leaving me；'' etc。 In each of these cases； however； it is not the memory that is at fault。 As a matter of fact the witness ought to have said ‘‘I am too stupid to answer this question；'' ‘‘Since the wound in question； my intellectual powers have failed；'' ‘‘I am already old； I am growing silly；'' etc。 But of course no one will； save very rarely； underestimate his good sense； and it is more comfortable to assign its deficiencies to the memory。 This occurs not only in words but also in construction。 If a man has incorrectly reproduced any matter； whether a false observation； or a deficient combination； or an unskilled interpretation of facts； he will not blame these things but will assign the fault to memory。 If he is believed； absolutely incorrect conclusions may result。
Section 56。 （e） Mnemotechnique。
Just a few words concerning mnemotechnique； mnemonic； and anamnestic。 The discovery of some means of helping the memory has long been a human purpose。 From Simonides of Chios； to the Sophist Hippias of Elis； experiments have been made in artificial development of the memory； and some have been remarkably successful。 Since the middle ages a large group of people have done this。 We still have the figures of the valid syllogisms in logic； like Barbara； etc。 The rules for remembering in the Latin grammar； etc。； may still be learned with advantage。 The books of Kothe and others； have； in their day； created not a little discussion。
As a rule； modern psychology pays a little attention to memory devices。 In a certain sense； nobody can avoid mnemonic； for whenever you tie a knot in your handkerchief； or stick your watch into your pocket upside down； you use a memory device。 Again； whenever you want to bear anything in mind you reduce difficulties and bring some kind of order into what you are trying to retain。
Thus； some artificial grip on the object is applied by everybody； and the utility and reliability of this grip determines the trustworthiness of a man's memory。 This fact may be important for the criminal lawyer in two ways。 On the one hand； it may help to clear up misunderstandings when false mnemonic has been applied。 Thus； once somebody called an aniline dye； which is soluble in water and is called ‘‘nigrosin；'' by the name ‘‘moorosin；'' and asked for it under that name in the store。 In order to aid his memory he had associated it with the word for black man = niger = negro = moor； and thus had substituted moor for nigro in the construction of the word he wanted。 Again； somebody asked for the ‘‘Duke Salm'' or the ‘‘Duke Schmier。'' The request was due to the fact that in the Austr
