Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > a history of science-1 >

µÚ38½Ú

a history of science-1-µÚ38½Ú

С˵£º a history of science-1 ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



ears¡¡after¡¡the¡¡death¡¡of¡¡Aristarchus¡£¡¡But£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡know£»¡¡the¡¡teaching¡¡of¡¡the¡¡astronomer¡¡of¡¡Samos¡¡did¡¡not¡¡win¡¡its¡¡way¡£¡¡The¡¡old¡¡conservative¡¡geocentric¡¡doctrine£»¡¡seemingly¡¡so¡¡much¡¡more¡¡in¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡the¡¡every¡­day¡¡observations¡¡of¡¡mankind£»¡¡supported¡¡by¡¡the¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡astronomers¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Peripatetic¡¡philosophers¡¡at¡¡their¡¡head£»¡¡held¡¡its¡¡place¡£¡¡It¡¡found¡¡fresh¡¡supporters¡¡presently¡¡among¡¡the¡¡later¡¡Alexandrians£»¡¡and¡¡so¡¡fully¡¡eclipsed¡¡the¡¡heliocentric¡¡view¡¡that¡¡we¡¡should¡¡scarcely¡¡know¡¡that¡¡view¡¡had¡¡even¡¡found¡¡an¡¡advocate¡¡were¡¡it¡¡not¡¡for¡¡here¡¡and¡¡there¡¡such¡¡a¡¡chance¡¡record¡¡as¡¡the¡¡phrases¡¡we¡¡have¡¡just¡¡quoted¡¡from¡¡Archimedes¡£¡¡Yet£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡now¡¡see£»¡¡the¡¡heliocentric¡¡doctrine£»¡¡which¡¡we¡¡know¡¡to¡¡be¡¡true£»¡¡had¡¡been¡¡thought¡¡out¡¡and¡¡advocated¡¡as¡¡the¡¡correct¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡celestial¡¡mechanics¡¡by¡¡at¡¡least¡¡one¡¡worker¡¡of¡¡the¡¡third¡¡century¡¡B¡£C¡£¡¡Such¡¡an¡¡idea£»¡¡we¡¡may¡¡be¡¡sure£»¡¡did¡¡not¡¡spring¡¡into¡¡the¡¡mind¡¡of¡¡its¡¡originator¡¡except¡¡as¡¡the¡¡culmination¡¡of¡¡a¡¡long¡¡series¡¡of¡¡observations¡¡and¡¡inferences¡£¡¡The¡¡precise¡¡character¡¡of¡¡the¡¡evolution¡¡we¡¡perhaps¡¡cannot¡¡trace£»¡¡but¡¡its¡¡broader¡¡outlines¡¡are¡¡open¡¡to¡¡our¡¡observation£»¡¡and¡¡we¡¡may¡¡not¡¡leave¡¡so¡¡important¡¡a¡¡topic¡¡without¡¡at¡¡least¡¡briefly¡¡noting¡¡them¡£¡¡Fully¡¡to¡¡understand¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡Aristarchus£»¡¡we¡¡must¡¡go¡¡back¡¡a¡¡century¡¡or¡¡two¡¡and¡¡recall¡¡that¡¡as¡¡long¡¡ago¡¡as¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡that¡¡other¡¡great¡¡native¡¡of¡¡Samos£»¡¡Pythagoras£»¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡had¡¡been¡¡reached¡¡that¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡is¡¡in¡¡motion¡£¡¡We¡¡saw£»¡¡in¡¡dealing¡¡with¡¡Pythagoras£»¡¡that¡¡we¡¡could¡¡not¡¡be¡¡sure¡¡as¡¡to¡¡precisely¡¡what¡¡he¡¡himself¡¡taught£»¡¡but¡¡there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡question¡¡that¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world's¡¡motion¡¡became¡¡from¡¡an¡¡early¡¡day¡¡a¡¡so¡­called¡¡Pythagorean¡¡doctrine¡£¡¡While¡¡all¡¡the¡¡other¡¡philosophers£»¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡we¡¡know£»¡¡still¡¡believed¡¡that¡¡the¡¡world¡¡was¡¡flat£»¡¡the¡¡Pythagoreans¡¡out¡¡in¡¡Italy¡¡taught¡¡that¡¡the¡¡world¡¡is¡¡a¡¡sphere¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡apparent¡¡motions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡heavenly¡¡bodies¡¡are¡¡really¡¡due¡¡to¡¡the¡¡actual¡¡motion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡itself¡£¡¡They¡¡did¡¡not£»¡¡however£»¡¡vault¡¡to¡¡the¡¡conclusion¡¡that¡¡this¡¡true¡¡motion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡takes¡¡place¡¡in¡¡the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡a¡¡circuit¡¡about¡¡the¡¡sun¡£¡¡Instead¡¡of¡¡that£»¡¡they¡¡conceived¡¡the¡¡central¡¡body¡¡of¡¡the¡¡universe¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡great¡¡fire£»¡¡invisible¡¡from¡¡the¡¡earth£»¡¡because¡¡the¡¡inhabited¡¡side¡¡of¡¡the¡¡terrestrial¡¡ball¡¡was¡¡turned¡¡away¡¡from¡¡it¡£¡¡The¡¡sun£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡held£»¡¡is¡¡but¡¡a¡¡great¡¡mirror£»¡¡which¡¡reflects¡¡the¡¡light¡¡from¡¡the¡¡central¡¡fire¡£¡¡Sun¡¡and¡¡earth¡¡alike¡¡revolve¡¡about¡¡this¡¡great¡¡fire£»¡¡each¡¡in¡¡its¡¡own¡¡orbit¡£¡¡Between¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡and¡¡the¡¡central¡¡fire¡¡there¡¡was£»¡¡curiously¡¡enough£»¡¡supposed¡¡to¡¡be¡¡an¡¡invisible¡¡earthlike¡¡body¡¡which¡¡was¡¡given¡¡the¡¡name¡¡of¡¡Anticthon£»¡¡or¡¡counter¡­earth¡£¡¡This¡¡body£»¡¡itself¡¡revolving¡¡about¡¡the¡¡central¡¡fire£»¡¡was¡¡supposed¡¡to¡¡shut¡¡off¡¡the¡¡central¡¡light¡¡now¡¡and¡¡again¡¡from¡¡the¡¡sun¡¡or¡¡from¡¡the¡¡moon£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡to¡¡account¡¡for¡¡certain¡¡eclipses¡¡for¡¡which¡¡the¡¡shadow¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡did¡¡not¡¡seem¡¡responsible¡£¡¡It¡¡was£»¡¡perhaps£»¡¡largely¡¡to¡¡account¡¡for¡¡such¡¡eclipses¡¡that¡¡the¡¡counter¡­earth¡¡was¡¡invented¡£¡¡But¡¡it¡¡is¡¡supposed¡¡that¡¡there¡¡was¡¡another¡¡reason¡£¡¡The¡¡Pythagoreans¡¡held¡¡that¡¡there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡peculiar¡¡sacredness¡¡in¡¡the¡¡number¡¡ten¡£¡¡Just¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Babylonians¡¡of¡¡the¡¡early¡¡day¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Hegelian¡¡philosophers¡¡of¡¡a¡¡more¡¡recent¡¡epoch¡¡saw¡¡a¡¡sacred¡¡connection¡¡between¡¡the¡¡number¡¡seven¡¡and¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡planetary¡¡bodies£»¡¡so¡¡the¡¡Pythagoreans¡¡thought¡¡that¡¡the¡¡universe¡¡must¡¡be¡¡arranged¡¡in¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡the¡¡number¡¡ten¡£¡¡Their¡¡count¡¡of¡¡the¡¡heavenly¡¡bodies£»¡¡including¡¡the¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fixed¡¡stars£»¡¡seemed¡¡to¡¡show¡¡nine£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡counter¡­earth¡¡supplied¡¡the¡¡missing¡¡body¡£¡¡The¡¡precise¡¡genesis¡¡and¡¡development¡¡of¡¡this¡¡idea¡¡cannot¡¡now¡¡be¡¡followed£»¡¡but¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was¡¡prevalent¡¡about¡¡the¡¡fifth¡¡century¡¡B¡£C¡£¡¡as¡¡a¡¡Pythagorean¡¡doctrine¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡questioned¡£¡¡Anaxagoras¡¡also¡¡is¡¡said¡¡to¡¡have¡¡taken¡¡account¡¡of¡¡the¡¡hypothetical¡¡counter¡­earth¡¡in¡¡his¡¡explanation¡¡of¡¡eclipses£»¡¡though£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡have¡¡seen£»¡¡he¡¡probably¡¡did¡¡not¡¡accept¡¡that¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡which¡¡held¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡sphere¡£¡¡The¡¡names¡¡of¡¡Philolaus¡¡and¡¡Heraclides¡¡have¡¡been¡¡linked¡¡with¡¡certain¡¡of¡¡these¡¡Pythagorean¡¡doctrines¡£¡¡Eudoxus£»¡¡too£»¡¡who£»¡¡like¡¡the¡¡others£»¡¡lived¡¡in¡¡Asia¡¡Minor¡¡in¡¡the¡¡fourth¡¡century¡¡B¡£C¡££»¡¡was¡¡held¡¡to¡¡have¡¡made¡¡special¡¡studies¡¡of¡¡the¡¡heavenly¡¡spheres¡¡and¡¡perhaps¡¡to¡¡have¡¡taught¡¡that¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡moves¡£¡¡So£»¡¡too£»¡¡Nicetas¡¡must¡¡be¡¡named¡¡among¡¡those¡¡whom¡¡rumor¡¡credited¡¡with¡¡having¡¡taught¡¡that¡¡the¡¡world¡¡is¡¡in¡¡motion¡£¡¡In¡¡a¡¡word£»¡¡the¡¡evidence£»¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡we¡¡can¡¡garner¡¡it¡¡from¡¡the¡¡remaining¡¡fragments£»¡¡tends¡¡to¡¡show¡¡that¡¡all¡¡along£»¡¡from¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡the¡¡early¡¡Pythagoreans£»¡¡there¡¡had¡¡been¡¡an¡¡undercurrent¡¡of¡¡opinion¡¡in¡¡the¡¡philosophical¡¡world¡¡which¡¡questioned¡¡the¡¡fixity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡would¡¡seem¡¡that¡¡the¡¡school¡¡of¡¡thinkers¡¡who¡¡tended¡¡to¡¡accept¡¡the¡¡revolutionary¡¡view¡¡centred¡¡in¡¡Asia¡¡Minor£»¡¡not¡¡far¡¡from¡¡the¡¡early¡¡home¡¡of¡¡the¡¡founder¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Pythagorean¡¡doctrines¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡not¡¡strange£»¡¡then£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡man¡¡who¡¡was¡¡finally¡¡to¡¡carry¡¡these¡¡new¡¡opinions¡¡to¡¡their¡¡logical¡¡conclusion¡¡should¡¡hail¡¡from¡¡Samos¡£¡¡But¡¡what¡¡was¡¡the¡¡support¡¡which¡¡observation¡¡could¡¡give¡¡to¡¡this¡¡new£»¡¡strange¡¡conception¡¡that¡¡the¡¡heavenly¡¡bodies¡¡do¡¡not¡¡in¡¡reality¡¡move¡¡as¡¡they¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡move£»¡¡but¡¡that¡¡their¡¡apparent¡¡motion¡¡is¡¡due¡¡to¡¡the¡¡actual¡¡revolution¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth£¿¡¡It¡¡is¡¡extremely¡¡difficult¡¡for¡¡any¡¡one¡¡nowadays¡¡to¡¡put¡¡himself¡¡in¡¡a¡¡mental¡¡position¡¡to¡¡answer¡¡this¡¡question¡£¡¡We¡¡are¡¡so¡¡accustomed¡¡to¡¡conceive¡¡the¡¡solar¡¡system¡¡as¡¡we¡¡know¡¡it¡¡to¡¡be£»¡¡that¡¡we¡¡are¡¡wont¡¡to¡¡forget¡¡how¡¡very¡¡different¡¡it¡¡is¡¡from¡¡what¡¡it¡¡seems¡£¡¡Yet¡¡one¡¡needs¡¡but¡¡to¡¡glance¡¡up¡¡at¡¡the¡¡sky£»¡¡and¡¡then¡¡to¡¡glance¡¡about¡¡one¡¡at¡¡the¡¡solid¡¡earth£»¡¡to¡¡grant£»¡¡on¡¡a¡¡moment's¡¡reflection£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡geocentric¡¡idea¡¡is¡¡of¡¡all¡¡others¡¡the¡¡most¡¡natural£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡to¡¡conceive¡¡the¡¡sun¡¡as¡¡the¡¡actual¡¡Centre¡¡of¡¡the¡¡solar¡¡system¡¡is¡¡an¡¡idea¡¡which¡¡must¡¡look¡¡for¡¡support¡¡to¡¡some¡¡other¡¡evidence¡¡than¡¡that¡¡which¡¡ordinary¡¡observation¡¡can¡¡give¡£¡¡Such¡¡was¡¡the¡¡view¡¡of¡¡most¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ancient¡¡philosophers£»¡¡and¡¡such¡¡continued¡¡to¡¡be¡¡the¡¡opinion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡mankind¡¡long¡¡after¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡Copernicus¡£¡¡We¡¡must¡¡not¡¡forget¡¡that¡¡even¡¡so¡¡great¡¡an¡¡observing¡¡astronomer¡¡as¡¡Tycho¡¡Brahe£»¡¡so¡¡late¡¡as¡¡the¡¡seventeenth¡¡century£»¡¡declined¡¡to¡¡accept¡¡the¡¡heliocentric¡¡theory£»¡¡though¡¡admitting¡¡that¡¡all¡¡the¡¡planets¡¡except¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡revolve¡¡about¡¡the¡¡sun¡£¡¡We¡¡shall¡¡see¡¡that¡¡before¡¡the¡¡Alexandrian¡¡school¡¡lost¡¡its¡¡influence¡¡a¡¡geocentric¡¡scheme¡¡had¡¡been¡¡evolved¡¡which¡¡fully¡¡explained¡¡all¡¡the¡¡apparent¡¡motions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡heavenly¡¡bodies¡£¡¡All¡¡this£»¡¡then£»¡¡makes¡¡us¡¡but¡¡wonder¡¡the¡¡more¡¡that¡¡the¡¡genius¡¡of¡¡an¡¡Aristarchus¡¡could¡¡give¡¡precedence¡¡to¡¡scientific¡¡induction¡¡as¡¡against¡¡the¡¡seemingly¡¡clear¡¡evidence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡senses¡£¡¡What£»¡¡then£»¡¡was¡¡the¡¡line¡¡of¡¡scientific¡¡induction¡¡that¡¡led¡¡Aristarchus¡¡to¡¡this¡¡wonderful¡¡goal£¿¡¡Fortunately£»¡¡we¡¡are¡¡able¡¡to¡¡answer¡¡that¡¡query£»¡¡at¡¡least¡¡in¡¡part¡£¡¡Aristarchus¡¡gained¡¡his¡¡evidence¡¡through¡¡some¡¡wonderful¡¡measurements¡£¡¡First£»¡¡he¡¡measured¡¡the¡¡disks¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sun¡¡and¡¡the¡¡moon¡£¡¡This£»¡¡of¡¡course£»¡¡could¡¡in¡¡itself¡¡give¡¡him¡¡no¡¡clew¡¡to¡¡the¡¡distance¡¡of¡¡these¡¡bodies£»¡¡and¡¡therefore¡¡no¡¡clew¡¡as¡¡to¡¡their¡¡relative¡¡size£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡attempting¡¡to¡¡obtain¡¡such¡¡a¡¡clew¡¡he¡¡hit¡¡upon¡¡a¡¡wonderful¡¡yet¡¡altogether¡¡simple¡¡experiment¡£¡¡It¡¡occurred¡¡to¡¡him¡¡that¡¡when¡¡the¡¡moon¡¡is¡¡precisely¡¡dichotomized¡¡that¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡precisely¡¡at¡¡the¡¡half¡­the¡¡line¡¡of¡¡vision¡¡from¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡to¡¡the¡¡moon¡¡must¡¡be¡¡precisely¡¡at¡¡right¡¡angles¡¡with¡¡the¡¡line¡¡of¡¡light¡¡passing¡¡from¡¡the¡¡sun¡¡to¡¡the¡¡moon¡£¡¡At¡¡this¡¡moment£»¡¡then£»¡¡the¡¡imaginary¡¡lines¡¡joining¡¡the¡¡sun£»¡¡the¡¡moon£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡earth£»¡¡make¡¡a¡¡right¡¡angle¡¡triangle¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡properties¡¡of¡¡the¡¡right¡­angle¡¡triangle¡¡had¡¡long¡¡been¡¡studied¡¡and¡¡were¡¡well¡¡under¡¡stood¡£¡¡One¡¡acute¡¡angle¡¡of¡¡such¡¡a¡¡triangle¡¡determines¡¡the¡¡figure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡triangle¡¡itself¡£¡¡We¡¡have¡¡already¡¡seen¡¡that¡¡Thales£»¡¡the¡¡very¡¡earliest¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Greek¡¡philosophers£»¡¡measured¡¡the¡¡distance¡¡of¡¡a¡¡ship¡¡at¡¡sea¡¡by¡¡the¡¡application¡¡of¡¡this¡¡principle¡£¡¡Now¡¡Aristarchus¡¡sights¡¡the¡¡sun¡¡in¡¡place¡¡of¡¡Thales'¡¡ship£»¡¡and£»¡¡sighting¡¡the¡¡moon¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time£»¡¡measures¡¡the¡¡angle¡¡and¡¡establishes¡¡the¡¡shape¡¡of¡¡his¡¡right¡­angle¡¡triangle¡£¡¡This¡¡does¡¡not¡¡tell¡¡him¡¡the¡¡distance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sun£»¡¡to¡¡be¡¡sure£»¡¡for¡¡he¡¡does¡¡not¡¡know¡¡the¡¡length¡¡of¡¡his¡¡base¡­linethat¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡of¡¡the¡¡line¡¡between¡¡the¡¡moon¡¡and¡¡the¡¡earth¡£¡¡But¡¡it¡¡does¡¡establish¡¡the¡¡relation¡¡of¡¡that¡¡base¡­line¡¡to¡¡the¡¡other¡¡lines¡¡of¡¡the¡¡triangle£»¡¡in¡¡other¡¡words£»¡¡it¡¡tells¡¡him¡¡the¡¡distance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sun¡¡in¡¡terms¡¡of¡¡the¡¡moon's¡¡distance¡£¡¡As¡¡Aristarchus¡¡strikes¡¡the¡¡angle£»¡¡it¡¡shows¡¡that¡¡the¡¡sun¡¡is¡¡eighteen¡¡times¡¡as¡¡distant¡¡as¡¡the¡¡moon¡£¡¡Now£»¡¡by¡¡comparing¡¡the¡¡apparent¡¡size¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sun¡¡with¡¡the¡¡apparent¡¡size¡¡of¡¡the¡¡moonwhich£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡have¡¡seen£»¡¡Aristarchus¡¡has¡¡already¡¡measuredhe¡¡is¡¡able¡¡to¡¡tell¡¡us¡¡that£»¡¡the¡¡sun¡¡is¡¡¡¨more¡¡than¡¡5832¡¡times£»¡¡and¡¡less¡¡than¡¡8000¡¨¡¡times¡¡larger¡¡than¡¡the¡¡moon£»¡¡though¡¡his¡¡measurements£»¡¡taken¡¡by¡¡themselves£»¡¡give¡¡no¡¡clew¡¡to¡¡the¡¡actual¡¡bulk¡¡of¡¡either¡¡body¡£¡¡These¡¡conclusions£»¡¡be¡¡it¡¡understood£»¡¡are¡¡absolutely¡¡valid¡¡inferencesnay£»¡¡demonstrationsfrom¡¡the¡¡measurements¡¡involved£»¡¡provided¡¡only¡¡that¡¡these¡¡measurements¡¡have¡¡been¡¡correct¡£¡¡Unfortunately£»¡¡the¡¡angle¡¡of¡¡the¡¡triangle¡¡we¡¡have¡¡just¡¡seen¡¡measured¡¡is¡¡exceedingly¡¡difficult¡¡to¡¡determine¡¡with¡¡accuracy£»¡¡while¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡moment's¡¡reflection¡¡will¡¡show£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡so¡¡large¡¡an¡¡angle¡¡that¡¡a¡¡very¡¡slight¡¡deviation¡¡from¡¡the¡¡truth¡¡will¡¡greatly¡¡affect¡¡the¡¡distance¡¡at¡¡which¡¡its¡¡line¡¡joins¡¡the¡¡other¡¡side¡¡of¡¡the¡¡triangle¡£¡¡Then¡¡again£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡virtually¡¡impossible¡¡to¡¡tell¡¡the¡¡precise¡¡moment¡¡when¡¡the¡¡moon¡¡is¡¡at¡¡half£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡line¡¡it¡¡gives¡¡is¡¡not¡¡so¡¡sharp¡¡that¡¡we¡¡can¡¡fix¡¡it¡¡with¡¡absolute¡¡accuracy¡£¡¡There¡¡is£»¡¡moreover£»¡¡another¡¡element¡¡of¡¡error¡¡due¡¡to¡¡the

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ