Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > a history of science-1 >

µÚ32½Ú

a history of science-1-µÚ32½Ú

С˵£º a history of science-1 ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



the¡¡multitudes£»¡¡at¡¡whose¡¡hands¡¡he¡¡suffered¡¡death£»¡¡legally¡¡administered¡¡after¡¡a¡¡public¡¡trial¡£¡¡The¡¡facts¡¡at¡¡command¡¡as¡¡to¡¡certain¡¡customs¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Greeks¡¡at¡¡this¡¡period¡¡make¡¡it¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡raise¡¡a¡¡question¡¡as¡¡to¡¡whether¡¡the¡¡alleged¡¡¡¨corruption¡¡of¡¡youth£»¡¨¡¡with¡¡which¡¡Socrates¡¡was¡¡charged£»¡¡may¡¡not¡¡have¡¡had¡¡a¡¡different¡¡implication¡¡from¡¡what¡¡posterity¡¡has¡¡preferred¡¡to¡¡ascribe¡¡to¡¡it¡£¡¡But¡¡this¡¡thought£»¡¡almost¡¡shocking¡¡to¡¡the¡¡modern¡¡mind¡¡and¡¡seeming¡¡altogether¡¡sacrilegious¡¡to¡¡most¡¡students¡¡of¡¡Greek¡¡philosophy£»¡¡need¡¡not¡¡here¡¡detain¡¡us£»¡¡neither¡¡have¡¡we¡¡much¡¡concern¡¡in¡¡the¡¡present¡¡connection¡¡with¡¡any¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡teaching¡¡of¡¡the¡¡martyred¡¡philosopher¡£¡¡For¡¡the¡¡historian¡¡of¡¡metaphysics£»¡¡Socrates¡¡marks¡¡an¡¡epoch£»¡¡but¡¡for¡¡the¡¡historian¡¡of¡¡science¡¡he¡¡is¡¡a¡¡much¡¡less¡¡consequential¡¡figure¡£¡¡Similarly¡¡regarding¡¡Plato£»¡¡the¡¡aristocratic¡¡Athenian¡¡who¡¡sat¡¡at¡¡the¡¡feet¡¡of¡¡Socrates£»¡¡and¡¡through¡¡whose¡¡writings¡¡the¡¡teachings¡¡of¡¡the¡¡master¡¡found¡¡widest¡¡currency¡£¡¡Some¡¡students¡¡of¡¡philosophy¡¡find¡¡in¡¡Plato¡¡¡¨the¡¡greatest¡¡thinker¡¡and¡¡writer¡¡of¡¡all¡¡time¡£¡¨£§1£§¡¡The¡¡student¡¡of¡¡science¡¡must¡¡recognize¡¡in¡¡him¡¡a¡¡thinker¡¡whose¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡was¡¡essentially¡¡non¡­scientific£»¡¡one¡¡who¡¡tended¡¡always¡¡to¡¡reason¡¡from¡¡the¡¡general¡¡to¡¡the¡¡particular¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡from¡¡the¡¡particular¡¡to¡¡the¡¡general¡£¡¡Plato's¡¡writings¡¡covered¡¡almost¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡field¡¡of¡¡thought£»¡¡and¡¡his¡¡ideas¡¡were¡¡presented¡¡with¡¡such¡¡literary¡¡charm¡¡that¡¡successive¡¡generations¡¡of¡¡readers¡¡turned¡¡to¡¡them¡¡with¡¡unflagging¡¡interest£»¡¡and¡¡gave¡¡them¡¡wide¡¡currency¡¡through¡¡copies¡¡that¡¡finally¡¡preserved¡¡them¡¡to¡¡our¡¡own¡¡time¡£¡¡Thus¡¡we¡¡are¡¡not¡¡obliged¡¡in¡¡his¡¡case£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡are¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡every¡¡other¡¡Greek¡¡philosopher£»¡¡to¡¡estimate¡¡his¡¡teachings¡¡largely¡¡from¡¡hearsay¡¡evidence¡£¡¡Plato¡¡himself¡¡speaks¡¡to¡¡us¡¡directly¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡true£»¡¡the¡¡literary¡¡form¡¡which¡¡he¡¡always¡¡adopted£»¡¡namely£»¡¡the¡¡dialogue£»¡¡does¡¡not¡¡give¡¡quite¡¡the¡¡same¡¡certainty¡¡as¡¡to¡¡when¡¡he¡¡is¡¡expressing¡¡his¡¡own¡¡opinions¡¡that¡¡a¡¡more¡¡direct¡¡narrative¡¡would¡¡have¡¡given£»¡¡yet£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡main£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡little¡¡doubt¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡tenor¡¡of¡¡his¡¡own¡¡opinionsexcept£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡such¡¡doubt¡¡as¡¡always¡¡attaches¡¡to¡¡the¡¡philosophical¡¡reasoning¡¡of¡¡the¡¡abstract¡¡thinker¡£¡¡What¡¡is¡¡chiefly¡¡significant¡¡from¡¡our¡¡present¡¡standpoint¡¡is¡¡that¡¡the¡¡great¡¡ethical¡¡teacher¡¡had¡¡no¡¡significant¡¡message¡¡to¡¡give¡¡the¡¡world¡¡regarding¡¡the¡¡physical¡¡sciences¡£¡¡He¡¡apparently¡¡had¡¡no¡¡sharply¡¡defined¡¡opinions¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡mechanism¡¡of¡¡the¡¡universe£»¡¡no¡¡clear¡¡conception¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡origin¡¡or¡¡development¡¡of¡¡organic¡¡beings£»¡¡no¡¡tangible¡¡ideas¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡problems¡¡of¡¡physics£»¡¡no¡¡favorite¡¡dreams¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡matter¡£¡¡Virtually¡¡his¡¡back¡¡was¡¡turned¡¡on¡¡this¡¡entire¡¡field¡¡of¡¡thought¡£¡¡He¡¡was¡¡under¡¡the¡¡sway¡¡of¡¡those¡¡innate¡¡ideas¡¡which£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡have¡¡urged£»¡¡were¡¡among¡¡the¡¡earliest¡¡inductions¡¡of¡¡science¡£¡¡But¡¡he¡¡never¡¡for¡¡a¡¡moment¡¡suspected¡¡such¡¡an¡¡origin¡¡for¡¡these¡¡ideas¡£¡¡He¡¡supposed¡¡his¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡being£»¡¡his¡¡standards¡¡of¡¡ethics£»¡¡to¡¡lie¡¡back¡¡of¡¡all¡¡experience£»¡¡for¡¡him¡¡they¡¡were¡¡the¡¡most¡¡fundamental¡¡and¡¡most¡¡dependable¡¡of¡¡facts¡£¡¡He¡¡criticised¡¡Anaxagoras¡¡for¡¡having¡¡tended¡¡to¡¡deduce¡¡general¡¡laws¡¡from¡¡observation¡£¡¡As¡¡we¡¡moderns¡¡see¡¡it£»¡¡such¡¡criticism¡¡is¡¡the¡¡highest¡¡possible¡¡praise¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡a¡¡criticism¡¡that¡¡marks¡¡the¡¡distinction¡¡between¡¡the¡¡scientist¡¡who¡¡is¡¡also¡¡a¡¡philosopher¡¡and¡¡the¡¡philosopher¡¡who¡¡has¡¡but¡¡a¡¡vague¡¡notion¡¡of¡¡physical¡¡science¡£¡¡Plato¡¡seemed£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡to¡¡realize¡¡the¡¡value¡¡of¡¡scientific¡¡investigation£»¡¡he¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡the¡¡astronomical¡¡studies¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Egyptians¡¡and¡¡Chaldeans£»¡¡and¡¡spoke¡¡hopefully¡¡of¡¡the¡¡results¡¡that¡¡might¡¡accrue¡¡were¡¡such¡¡studies¡¡to¡¡be¡¡taken¡¡up¡¡by¡¡that¡¡Greek¡¡mind¡¡which£»¡¡as¡¡he¡¡justly¡¡conceived£»¡¡had¡¡the¡¡power¡¡to¡¡vitalize¡¡and¡¡enrich¡¡all¡¡that¡¡it¡¡touched¡£¡¡But¡¡he¡¡told¡¡here¡¡of¡¡what¡¡he¡¡would¡¡have¡¡others¡¡do£»¡¡not¡¡of¡¡what¡¡he¡¡himself¡¡thought¡¡of¡¡doing¡£¡¡His¡¡voice¡¡was¡¡prophetic£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡stimulated¡¡no¡¡worker¡¡of¡¡his¡¡own¡¡time¡£¡¡Plato¡¡himself¡¡had¡¡travelled¡¡widely¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡a¡¡familiar¡¡legend¡¡that¡¡he¡¡lived¡¡for¡¡years¡¡in¡¡Egypt£»¡¡endeavoring¡¡there¡¡to¡¡penetrate¡¡the¡¡mysteries¡¡of¡¡Egyptian¡¡science¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡said¡¡even¡¡that¡¡the¡¡rudiments¡¡of¡¡geometry¡¡which¡¡he¡¡acquired¡¡there¡¡influenced¡¡all¡¡his¡¡later¡¡teachings¡£¡¡But¡¡be¡¡that¡¡as¡¡it¡¡may£»¡¡the¡¡historian¡¡of¡¡science¡¡must¡¡recognize¡¡in¡¡the¡¡founder¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Academy¡¡a¡¡moral¡¡teacher¡¡and¡¡metaphysical¡¡dreamer¡¡and¡¡sociologist£»¡¡but¡¡not£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡modern¡¡acceptance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡term£»¡¡a¡¡scientist¡£¡¡Those¡¡wider¡¡phases¡¡of¡¡biological¡¡science¡¡which¡¡find¡¡their¡¡expression¡¡in¡¡metaphysics£»¡¡in¡¡ethics£»¡¡in¡¡political¡¡economy£»¡¡lie¡¡without¡¡our¡¡present¡¡scope£»¡¡and¡¡for¡¡the¡¡development¡¡of¡¡those¡¡subjects¡¡with¡¡which¡¡we¡¡are¡¡more¡¡directly¡¡concerned£»¡¡Plato£»¡¡like¡¡his¡¡master£»¡¡has¡¡a¡¡negative¡¡significance¡£

ARISTOTLE¡¡£¨384¡­322¡¡B¡£C¡££©¡¡When¡¡we¡¡pass¡¡to¡¡that¡¡third¡¡great¡¡Athenian¡¡teacher£»¡¡Aristotle£»¡¡the¡¡case¡¡is¡¡far¡¡different¡£¡¡Here¡¡was¡¡a¡¡man¡¡whose¡¡name¡¡was¡¡to¡¡be¡¡received¡¡as¡¡almost¡¡a¡¡synonym¡¡for¡¡Greek¡¡science¡¡for¡¡more¡¡than¡¡a¡¡thousand¡¡years¡¡after¡¡his¡¡death¡£¡¡All¡¡through¡¡the¡¡Middle¡¡Ages¡¡his¡¡writings¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡accepted¡¡as¡¡virtually¡¡the¡¡last¡¡word¡¡regarding¡¡the¡¡problems¡¡of¡¡nature¡£¡¡We¡¡shall¡¡see¡¡that¡¡his¡¡followers¡¡actually¡¡preferred¡¡his¡¡mandate¡¡to¡¡the¡¡testimony¡¡of¡¡their¡¡own¡¡senses¡£¡¡We¡¡shall¡¡see£»¡¡further£»¡¡that¡¡modern¡¡science¡¡progressed¡¡somewhat¡¡in¡¡proportion¡¡as¡¡it¡¡overthrew¡¡the¡¡Aristotelian¡¡dogmas¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡traditions¡¡of¡¡seventeen¡¡or¡¡eighteen¡¡centuries¡¡are¡¡not¡¡easily¡¡set¡¡aside£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡is¡¡perhaps¡¡not¡¡too¡¡much¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡the¡¡name¡¡of¡¡Aristotle¡¡stands£»¡¡even¡¡in¡¡our¡¡own¡¡time£»¡¡as¡¡vaguely¡¡representative¡¡in¡¡the¡¡popular¡¡mind¡¡of¡¡all¡¡that¡¡was¡¡highest¡¡and¡¡best¡¡in¡¡the¡¡science¡¡of¡¡antiquity¡£¡¡Yet£»¡¡perhaps£»¡¡it¡¡would¡¡not¡¡be¡¡going¡¡too¡¡far¡¡to¡¡assert¡¡that¡¡something¡¡like¡¡a¡¡reversal¡¡of¡¡this¡¡judgment¡¡would¡¡be¡¡nearer¡¡the¡¡truth¡£¡¡Aristotle¡¡did£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡bring¡¡together¡¡a¡¡great¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡facts¡¡regarding¡¡animals¡¡in¡¡his¡¡work¡¡on¡¡natural¡¡history£»¡¡which£»¡¡being¡¡preserved£»¡¡has¡¡been¡¡deemed¡¡to¡¡entitle¡¡its¡¡author¡¡to¡¡be¡¡called¡¡the¡¡¡¨father¡¡of¡¡zoology¡£¡¨¡¡But¡¡there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡reason¡¡to¡¡suppose¡¡that¡¡any¡¡considerable¡¡portion¡¡of¡¡this¡¡work¡¡contained¡¡matter¡¡that¡¡was¡¡novel£»¡¡or¡¡recorded¡¡observations¡¡that¡¡were¡¡original¡¡with¡¡Aristotle£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡classifications¡¡there¡¡outlined¡¡are¡¡at¡¡best¡¡but¡¡a¡¡vague¡¡foreshadowing¡¡of¡¡the¡¡elaboration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡science¡£¡¡Such¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is£»¡¡however£»¡¡the¡¡natural¡¡history¡¡stands¡¡to¡¡the¡¡credit¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Stagirite¡£¡¡He¡¡must¡¡be¡¡credited£»¡¡too£»¡¡with¡¡a¡¡clear¡¡enunciation¡¡of¡¡one¡¡most¡¡important¡¡scientific¡¡doctrinenamely£»¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡the¡¡spherical¡¡figure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth¡£¡¡We¡¡have¡¡already¡¡seen¡¡that¡¡this¡¡theory¡¡originated¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Pythagorean¡¡philosophers¡¡out¡¡in¡¡Italy¡£¡¡We¡¡have¡¡seen£»¡¡too£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡had¡¡not¡¡made¡¡its¡¡way¡¡in¡¡Attica¡¡in¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡Anaxagoras¡£¡¡But¡¡in¡¡the¡¡intervening¡¡century¡¡it¡¡had¡¡gained¡¡wide¡¡currency£»¡¡else¡¡so¡¡essentially¡¡conservative¡¡a¡¡thinker¡¡as¡¡Aristotle¡¡would¡¡scarcely¡¡have¡¡accepted¡¡it¡£¡¡He¡¡did¡¡accept¡¡it£»¡¡however£»¡¡and¡¡gave¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡clearest¡¡and¡¡most¡¡precise¡¡expression¡£¡¡Here¡¡are¡¡his¡¡words£º£§2£§

¡¨As¡¡to¡¡the¡¡figure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡it¡¡must¡¡necessarily¡¡be¡¡spherical¡£¡£¡£¡£¡¡If¡¡it¡¡were¡¡not¡¡so£»¡¡the¡¡eclipses¡¡of¡¡the¡¡moon¡¡would¡¡not¡¡have¡¡such¡¡sections¡¡as¡¡they¡¡have¡£¡¡For¡¡in¡¡the¡¡configurations¡¡in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡a¡¡month¡¡the¡¡deficient¡¡part¡¡takes¡¡all¡¡different¡¡shapes£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡straight£»¡¡and¡¡concave£»¡¡and¡¡convex£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡eclipses¡¡it¡¡always¡¡has¡¡the¡¡line¡¡of¡¡divisions¡¡convex£»¡¡wherefore£»¡¡since¡¡the¡¡moon¡¡is¡¡eclipsed¡¡in¡¡consequence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡interposition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth£»¡¡the¡¡periphery¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡must¡¡be¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡this¡¡by¡¡having¡¡a¡¡spherical¡¡form¡£¡¡And¡¡again£»¡¡from¡¡the¡¡appearance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡stars¡¡it¡¡is¡¡clear£»¡¡not¡¡only¡¡that¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡is¡¡round£»¡¡but¡¡that¡¡its¡¡size¡¡is¡¡not¡¡very¡¡large£»¡¡for¡¡when¡¡we¡¡make¡¡a¡¡small¡¡removal¡¡to¡¡the¡¡south¡¡or¡¡the¡¡north£»¡¡the¡¡circle¡¡of¡¡the¡¡horizon¡¡becomes¡¡palpably¡¡different£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡the¡¡stars¡¡overhead¡¡undergo¡¡a¡¡great¡¡change£»¡¡and¡¡are¡¡not¡¡the¡¡same¡¡to¡¡those¡¡that¡¡travel¡¡in¡¡the¡¡north¡¡and¡¡to¡¡the¡¡south¡£¡¡For¡¡some¡¡stars¡¡are¡¡seen¡¡in¡¡Egypt¡¡or¡¡at¡¡Cyprus£»¡¡but¡¡are¡¡not¡¡seen¡¡in¡¡the¡¡countries¡¡to¡¡the¡¡north¡¡of¡¡these£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡stars¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡north¡¡are¡¡visible¡¡while¡¡they¡¡make¡¡a¡¡complete¡¡circuit£»¡¡there¡¡undergo¡¡a¡¡setting¡£¡¡So¡¡that¡¡from¡¡this¡¡it¡¡is¡¡manifest£»¡¡not¡¡only¡¡that¡¡the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡is¡¡round£»¡¡but¡¡also¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡a¡¡not¡¡very¡¡large¡¡sphere£»¡¡for¡¡otherwise¡¡the¡¡difference¡¡would¡¡not¡¡be¡¡so¡¡obvious¡¡to¡¡persons¡¡making¡¡so¡¡small¡¡a¡¡change¡¡of¡¡place¡£¡¡Wherefore¡¡we¡¡may¡¡judge¡¡that¡¡those¡¡persons¡¡who¡¡connect¡¡the¡¡region¡¡in¡¡the¡¡neighborhood¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pillars¡¡of¡¡Hercules¡¡with¡¡that¡¡towards¡¡India£»¡¡and¡¡who¡¡assert¡¡that¡¡in¡¡this¡¡way¡¡the¡¡sea¡¡is¡¡one£»¡¡do¡¡not¡¡assert¡¡things¡¡very¡¡improbable¡£¡¡They¡¡confirm¡¡this¡¡conjecture¡¡moreover¡¡by¡¡the¡¡elephants£»¡¡which¡¡are¡¡said¡¡to¡¡be¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡species¡¡towards¡¡each¡¡extreme£»¡¡as¡¡if¡¡this¡¡circumstance¡¡was¡¡a¡¡consequence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conjunction¡¡of¡¡the¡¡extremes¡£¡¡The¡¡mathematicians¡¡who¡¡try¡¡to¡¡calculate¡¡the¡¡measure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡circumference£»¡¡make¡¡it¡¡amount¡¡to¡¡four¡¡hundred¡¡thousand¡¡stadia£»¡¡whence¡¡we¡¡collect¡¡that¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡is¡¡not¡¡only¡¡spherical£»¡¡but¡¡is¡¡not¡¡large¡¡compared¡¡with¡¡the¡¡magnitude¡¡of¡¡the¡¡other¡¡stars¡£¡¨¡¡But¡¡in¡¡giving¡¡full¡¡meed¡¡of¡¡praise¡¡to¡¡Aristotle¡¡for¡¡the¡¡promulgation¡¡of¡¡this¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sphericity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth£»¡¡it¡¡must¡¡unfortunately¡¡be¡¡added¡¡that¡¡the¡¡conservative¡¡philosopher¡¡paused¡¡without¡¡taking¡¡one¡¡other¡¡important¡¡step¡£¡¡He¡¡could¡¡not¡¡accept£»¡¡but£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contrary£»¡¡he¡¡expressly¡¡repudiated£»¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth's¡¡motion¡£¡¡We¡¡have¡¡seen¡¡that¡¡this¡¡idea¡¡also¡¡was¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Pythagorean¡¡doctrine£»¡¡and¡¡we¡¡shall¡¡have¡¡occasion¡¡to¡¡dwell¡¡more¡¡at¡¡length¡¡on¡¡this¡¡point¡¡in¡¡a¡¡succeeding¡¡chapter¡£¡¡It¡¡has¡¡even¡¡been¡¡contended¡¡by¡¡some¡¡critics¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was¡¡the¡¡adverse¡¡conviction¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Peripatetic¡¡philosopher¡¡which£»¡¡more¡¡than¡¡an

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ