study of the king james bible(钦印〈圣经〉研究)-第10节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
experiences in his declaration that there were to be no marginal notes in
that new version。
When they looked back on the conference； the Puritans felt that they
had lost everything； and the High Church people that they had gained
everything。 One of the bishops； in a very servile way； and on his knee；
gave thanks to God for having given the country such a king； whose like
had never been seen since Christ was on earth。 Certainly hard times were
ahead for the Puritans。 The King harried them according to his word。
Within sixteen years some of them landed at Plymouth Rock； and things
began to happen on this side。 That settlement at Plymouth was the
outcome of the threat the King had made at the Hampton Court
conference。
But looking back one can see that the conference was worth while for
the beginning of the movement for the new version。 The King was true to
his word in this line also； and before the year was out had appointed the
fifty…four best Bible scholars of the realm to make the new version。 They
were to sit in six companies of nine each； two at Oxford； two at
Cambridge； and two at Westminster。 The names of only forty…seven of
them have come down to us； and it is not known whether the other seven
were ever appointed； or in what way their names have been lost。 It must be
said for the King that the only principle of selection was scholarship； and
when those six groups of men met they were men of the very first rank；
with no peers outside their own numberswith one exception； and that
31
… Page 32…
Study of the King James Bible
exception is of some passing interest。 Hugh Broughton was probably the
foremost Hebrew scholar of England； perhaps of the world； at the time；
and apparently he was not appointed on the committee。 Chiefly； it seems
to have been because he was a man of ungovernable temper and utterly
unfitted to work with others。 Failure to appoint him； however； bit and
rankled； and the only keen and sharp criticism that was passed on the
version in its own day was by Hugh Broughton。 He sent word to the King；
after it was completed； that as for himself he would rather be rent to pieces
by wild horses than have had any part in the urging of such a wretched
version of the Bible on the poor people。 That was so manifestly pique；
however； that it is only to be regretted that the translation did not have the
benefit of his great Hebrew knowledge。 John Selden； at his prime in that
day； voiced the feeling of most scholars of the times； that the new
translation was the best in the world and best gave the sense of the
original。
We do not know much of the personnel of the company。 Their names
would mean very little to us at this distance。 All were clergymen except
one。 There were bishops； college principals； university fellows； and rectors。
Dr。 Reynolds； who suggested it in the first place； was a member； though he
did not live to see the work finished。 This Dr。 Reynolds； by the way； was
party to a most curious episode。 He had been an ardent Roman Catholic；
and he had a brother who was an equally ardent Protestant。 They argued
with each other so earnestly that each convinced the other； the Roman
Catholic became a Protestant； and the Protestant became a Roman
Catholic！ Dr。 Lancelot Andrewes； chairman of one of the two companies
that met at Westminster； was probably the most learned man in England。
They said of him that if he had been present at the tower of Babel he could
have interpreted for all the tongues present。 The only trouble was that the
world lacked learning enough to know how learned he was。 His company
had the first part of the Old Testament； and the simple dignity of the style
they used shows how scholarship and simplicity go easily together。 Most
people would consider that the least satisfactory part of the work is the
second section； running from I Chronicles to Ecclesiastes。 A convert from
another faith； who learned to read the Bible in English； once expressed to
32
… Page 33…
Study of the King James Bible
a friend of my own his feeling that except for the Psalms and parts of Job；
there seemed to be here a distinct letting…down of the dignity of the
translation。 There is good excuse for this； if it is so； for two leading
members of the company who had that section in charge； both eminent
Cambridge scholars； died very early in the work； and their places were not
filled。 The third company； sitting at Oxford； were peculiarly strong； and
had for their portion the hardest part of the Old Testamentall the
prophetical writings。 But they did their part with finest skill。 The fourth
company； sitting at Cambridge； had the Apocrypha； the books which lie
between the Old and the New Testaments for the most part； or else are
supplemental to certain Old Testament books。 Their work was rather
hastily and certainly poorly done； and has been dropped out of most
editions。 The fifth company； sitting at Oxford； with great Greek scholars
on it； took the Gospels； the Acts； and the Revelation。 This company had in
it the one layman； Sir Henry Savile； then the greatest Greek scholar in
England。 It is the same Sir Henry Savile who heard； on his death…bed in
1621； that James had with his own hands torn from the Journal of
Parliament the pages which bore the protest in favor of free speech in
Parliament。 Hearing it； the faithful scholar prayed to die； saying： 〃I am
ready to depart； the rather that having lived in good times I foresee worse。〃
The sixth company met at Westminster and translated the New Testament
epistles。
It was the original plan that when one company had finished its part；
the result should go to each of the other companies； coming back with
their suggestions to the original workers to be recast by them。 The whole
was then to be reviewed by a smaller committee of scholars to give it
uniformity and to see it through the press。 The records are not extant that
tell whether this was done in full detail； though we may presume that each
section of the Scripture had the benefit of the scholarship of the entire
company。
We know a good deal of the method of their work。 We shall
understand it better by recalling what material they had at hand。 They
were enabled to use the result of all the work that had been done before
them。 They were instructed to follow the Bishops' Bible wherever they
33
… Page 34…
Study of the King James Bible
could do so fairly； but they were given power to use the versions already
named from Wiclif down； as well as those fragmentary versions which
were numerous； and of which no mention has been made。 They ransacked
all English forms for felicitous words and happy phrases。 It is one of the
interesting incidents that this same Hugh Broughton； who was left off the
committee and took it so hard； yet without his will contributed some
important matter to the translation； because he had on his own authority
made translations of certain parts of the Scripture。 Several of our capital
phrases in the King James version are from him。 There was no effort to
break out new paths。 Preference was always given to a familiar phrase
rather than to a new one； unless accuracy required it。 First； then； they had
the benefit of all the work that had been done before in the same line； and
gladly used it。
In addition； they had all other versions made in the tongues of the time。
Chiefly there was Luther's German Bible； already become for the German
tongue what their version was destined to be for the English tongue。 There
were parts of the Bible available in Spanish； French； and Dutch。 They
were k
