湊徨勵弌傍利 > 哂囂窮徨慕 > theologico-political treatise p3(舞僥嚥屓嵶廨籾冩梢3) >

及6准

theologico-political treatise p3(舞僥嚥屓嵶廨籾冩梢3)-及6准


梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




matters     after   they   had    become     mixed     up   with    religion�察  �so   that   some 

individual   might   prop   up   his   own   inventions   with   a   pretext   of   Divine 

authority。 ��75�� But such matters have little to do with salvation�察�whether 

they be corrupted little or much�察�as I will show in detail in the next chapter�察�

though I think the question sufficiently plain from what I have said already�察�

especially in Chapter II。 



                                                17 


´ Page 18´

                                A Theologico´Political Treatise 



                             CHAPTER XIII 



     IT    IS   SHOWN        THAT       SCRIPTURE         TEACHES          ONLY      VERY 

SIMPLE DOCTRINES�察�SUCH AS SUFFICE FOR RIGHT CONDUCT。 

     ��1��   In  the  second     chapter   of  this  treatise   we   pointed    out  that  the 

prophets were gifted with extraordinary powers of imagination�察�but not of 

understanding�察�also that God only revealed to them such things as are very 

simple      ´  not    philosophic     mysteries�察     �   and    that   He    adapted     His 

communications to their previous opinions。 ��2�� We further showed in Chap。 

V。   that   Scripture   only   transmits   and   teaches   truths   which   can   readily   be 

comprehended by all�察�not deducing and concatenating its conclusions from 

definitions   and   axioms�察  �but   narrating   quite   simply�察  �and   confirming   its 

statements�察�with a view to inspiring belief�察�by an appeal to experience as 

exemplified in miracles and history�察�and setting forth its truths in the style 

and phraseology which would most appeal to the popular mind ��cf。 Chap。 

VI。�察�third division��。 

     ��3��   Lastly�察  �we   demonstrated       in  Chap。    VIII。   that  the   difficulty   of 

understanding        Scripture    lies  in   the   language     only�察  �and    not   in  the 

abstruseness of the argument。 

     ��4��   To   these   considerations   we   may   add   that   the   Prophets   did   not 

preach only to the  learned�察�but to all   Jews�察�without exception�察�while  the 

Apostles were wont to teach the gospel doctrine in churches where there 

were public meetings�察�whence it follows that Scriptural doctrine contains 

no   lofty   speculations   nor   philosophic      reasoning�察  �but   only   very   simple 

matters�察�such as could be understood by the slowest intelligence。 

     ��5�� I am consequently lost in wonder at the ingenuity of those whom I 

have   already   mentioned�察  �who   detect   in   the   Bible   mysteries   so   profound 

that    they   cannot    be   explained      in  human     language�察    �and    who    have 

introduced so many philosophic speculations into religion that the Church 

seems like an academy�察�and religion like a science�察�or rather a dispute。 

     ��6��   It   is   not   to   be   wondered   at   that   men�察  �who   boast   of   possessing 

supernatural      intelligence�察   �should     be   unwilling    to   yield   the   palm    of 

knowledge to philosophers who have only their ordinary�察�faculties�察�still I 

should be surprised if I found them teaching any new speculative doctrine�察�



                                             18 


´ Page 19´

                                A Theologico´Political Treatise 



which   was   not   a   commonplace   to   those   Gentile   philosophers   whom�察  �in 

spite    of  all�察 �they   stigmatize    as  blind�察  �for�察 �if  one   inquires    what    these 

mysteries lurking in Scripture may be�察�one is confronted with nothing but 

the reflections of Plato or Aristotle�察�or the like�察�which it would often be 

easier    for  an   ignorant    man    to  dream   than    for   the  most    accomplished 

scholar to wrest out of the Bible。 

     ��7�� However�察�I do not wish to affirm absolutely that Scripture contains 

no doctrines in the sphere of philosophy�察�for in the last chapter I pointed 

out some of the kind�察�as fundamental principles�察�but I go so far as to say 

that such doctrines are very few and very simple。 ��8�� Their precise nature 

and definition I will now set forth。 ��9�� The task will be easy�察�for we know 

that    Scripture    does    not   aim   at   imparting     scientific   knowledge�察      �and�察�

therefore�察    �it  demands     from    men    nothing    but   obedience�察    �and   censures 

obstinacy�察�but not ignorance。 

     ��10�� Furthermore�察�as obedience to God consists solely in love to our 

neighbour   ´   for   whosoever   loveth   his   neighbour�察  �as   a   means   of   obeying 

God�察�hath�察�as St。 Paul says ��Rom。 xiii��8���察�fulfilled the law�察 � it follows that 

no knowledge is commended in the Bible save that which is necessary for 

enabling   all   men   to   obey   God   in   the   manner   stated�察  �and   without   which 

they would become rebellious�察�or without the discipline of obedience。 

     ��11�� Other speculative questions�察�which have no direct bearing on this 

object�察  �or   are   concerned   with   the   knowledge   of   natural   events�察  �do   not 

affect Scripture�察�and should be entirely separated from religion。 

     ��12�� Now�察�though everyone�察�as we have said�察�is now quite able to see 

this   truth   for   himself�察  �I   should   nevertheless   wish�察  �considering   that   the 

whole   of   Religion   depends   thereon�察  �to   explain   the   entire   question   more 

accurately      and   clearly。   ��13��   To   this   end   I  must    first  prove    that  the 

intellectual or accurate knowledge of God is not a gift�察�bestowed upon all 

good     men    like   obedience�察    �and�察  �further�察  �that   the   knowledge      of   God�察�

required by Him through His prophets from everyone without exception�察�

as needful to be known�察�is simply a knowledge of His Divine justice and 

charity。 ��14�� Both these points are easily proved from Scripture。 ��15�� The 

first plainly follows from Exodus vi��2�察�where God�察�in order to show the 

singular grace bestowed upon Moses�察�says to him�此 �And I appeared unto 



                                              19 


´ Page 20´

                                 A Theologico´Political Treatise 



Abraham�察�unto Isaac�察�and unto Jacob by the name of El Sadai ��A。 V。 God 

Almighty���察�but by my name Jehovah was I not known to them; ´ for the 

better   understanding   of   which   passage   I   may   remark   that   El   Sadai�察  �in 

Hebrew�察�signifies the God who suffices�察�in that He gives to every man that 

which   suffices   for   him�察  �and�察  �although   Sadai   is   often   used   by   itself�察  �to 

signify God�察�we cannot doubt that the word El ��God�察。�power�察�might���� is 

everywhere   understood。  ��16��   Furthermore�察 �we   must   note   that Jehovah   is 

the only word found in Scripture with the meaning of the absolute essence 

of God�察�without reference to created things。 ��17�� The Jews maintain�察�for 

this reason�察�that this is�察�strictly speaking�察�the only name of God�察�that the 

rest of the words used are merely titles�察�and�察�in truth�察�the other names of 

God�察  �whether   they   be   substantives   or   adjectives�察  �are   merely   attributive�察�

and belong to Him�察�in so far as He is conceived of in relation to created 

things�察   �or   manifested     through     them。    ��18��   Thus    El�察 �or  Eloah�察   �signifies 

powerful�察  �as   is   well   known�察  �and   only   applies   to   God   in   respect   to   His 

supremacy�察�as when we call Paul an apostle�察�the faculties of his power are 

set forth in an accompanying adjective�察�as El�察�great�察�awful�察�just�察�merciful�察�

&c。�察  �or   else   all   are   understood   at   once   by   the   use   of   El   in   the   plural 

number�察�with a singular signification�察�an expression frequently adopted in 

Scripture。 

     ��19�� Now�察�as God tells Moses that He was not known to the patriarchs 

by  the   name   of   Jehovah�察  �it   follows   that   they  were   not   cognizant   of   any 

attribute   of   God   which   expresses   His   absolute   essence�察  �but   only   of   His 

deeds and promises that is�察�of His power�察�as manifested in visible things。 

��20�� God does not thus speak to Moses in order to accuse the patriarchs of 

infidelity�察�but�察�on the contrary�察�as a means of extolling their belief and faith�察�

inasmuch as�察�though they possessed no extraordinary knowledge of God 

��such as Moses had���察�they yet accepted His promises as fixed and certain�察�

whereas      Moses�察    �though     his   thoughts     about    God    were     more    exalted�察�

nevertheless doubted about the Divine promises�察�and complained to God 

that�察  �instead   of   the   promised   deliverance�察  �the   prospects   of   the   Israelites 

had darkened。 

     ��21�� As the patriarchs did not know the distinctive name of God�察�and 

as   God   mentions   the   fact   to   Moses�察  �in   praise   of   their   faith   and   single´ 



                                               20 


´ Page 21´

                                 A Theologico´Political Treatise 



heartedness�察�and in contrast t

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��2�� 家��4��

低辛嬬浪散議