theologico-political treatise p3(舞僥嚥屓嵶廨籾冩梢3)-及6准
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
matters after they had become mixed up with religion�察 �so that some
individual might prop up his own inventions with a pretext of Divine
authority。 ��75�� But such matters have little to do with salvation�察�whether
they be corrupted little or much�察�as I will show in detail in the next chapter�察�
though I think the question sufficiently plain from what I have said already�察�
especially in Chapter II。
17
´ Page 18´
A Theologico´Political Treatise
CHAPTER XIII
IT IS SHOWN THAT SCRIPTURE TEACHES ONLY VERY
SIMPLE DOCTRINES�察�SUCH AS SUFFICE FOR RIGHT CONDUCT。
��1�� In the second chapter of this treatise we pointed out that the
prophets were gifted with extraordinary powers of imagination�察�but not of
understanding�察�also that God only revealed to them such things as are very
simple ´ not philosophic mysteries�察 � and that He adapted His
communications to their previous opinions。 ��2�� We further showed in Chap。
V。 that Scripture only transmits and teaches truths which can readily be
comprehended by all�察�not deducing and concatenating its conclusions from
definitions and axioms�察 �but narrating quite simply�察 �and confirming its
statements�察�with a view to inspiring belief�察�by an appeal to experience as
exemplified in miracles and history�察�and setting forth its truths in the style
and phraseology which would most appeal to the popular mind ��cf。 Chap。
VI。�察�third division��。
��3�� Lastly�察 �we demonstrated in Chap。 VIII。 that the difficulty of
understanding Scripture lies in the language only�察 �and not in the
abstruseness of the argument。
��4�� To these considerations we may add that the Prophets did not
preach only to the learned�察�but to all Jews�察�without exception�察�while the
Apostles were wont to teach the gospel doctrine in churches where there
were public meetings�察�whence it follows that Scriptural doctrine contains
no lofty speculations nor philosophic reasoning�察 �but only very simple
matters�察�such as could be understood by the slowest intelligence。
��5�� I am consequently lost in wonder at the ingenuity of those whom I
have already mentioned�察 �who detect in the Bible mysteries so profound
that they cannot be explained in human language�察 �and who have
introduced so many philosophic speculations into religion that the Church
seems like an academy�察�and religion like a science�察�or rather a dispute。
��6�� It is not to be wondered at that men�察 �who boast of possessing
supernatural intelligence�察 �should be unwilling to yield the palm of
knowledge to philosophers who have only their ordinary�察�faculties�察�still I
should be surprised if I found them teaching any new speculative doctrine�察�
18
´ Page 19´
A Theologico´Political Treatise
which was not a commonplace to those Gentile philosophers whom�察 �in
spite of all�察 �they stigmatize as blind�察 �for�察 �if one inquires what these
mysteries lurking in Scripture may be�察�one is confronted with nothing but
the reflections of Plato or Aristotle�察�or the like�察�which it would often be
easier for an ignorant man to dream than for the most accomplished
scholar to wrest out of the Bible。
��7�� However�察�I do not wish to affirm absolutely that Scripture contains
no doctrines in the sphere of philosophy�察�for in the last chapter I pointed
out some of the kind�察�as fundamental principles�察�but I go so far as to say
that such doctrines are very few and very simple。 ��8�� Their precise nature
and definition I will now set forth。 ��9�� The task will be easy�察�for we know
that Scripture does not aim at imparting scientific knowledge�察 �and�察�
therefore�察 �it demands from men nothing but obedience�察 �and censures
obstinacy�察�but not ignorance。
��10�� Furthermore�察�as obedience to God consists solely in love to our
neighbour ´ for whosoever loveth his neighbour�察 �as a means of obeying
God�察�hath�察�as St。 Paul says ��Rom。 xiii��8���察�fulfilled the law�察 � it follows that
no knowledge is commended in the Bible save that which is necessary for
enabling all men to obey God in the manner stated�察 �and without which
they would become rebellious�察�or without the discipline of obedience。
��11�� Other speculative questions�察�which have no direct bearing on this
object�察 �or are concerned with the knowledge of natural events�察 �do not
affect Scripture�察�and should be entirely separated from religion。
��12�� Now�察�though everyone�察�as we have said�察�is now quite able to see
this truth for himself�察 �I should nevertheless wish�察 �considering that the
whole of Religion depends thereon�察 �to explain the entire question more
accurately and clearly。 ��13�� To this end I must first prove that the
intellectual or accurate knowledge of God is not a gift�察�bestowed upon all
good men like obedience�察 �and�察 �further�察 �that the knowledge of God�察�
required by Him through His prophets from everyone without exception�察�
as needful to be known�察�is simply a knowledge of His Divine justice and
charity。 ��14�� Both these points are easily proved from Scripture。 ��15�� The
first plainly follows from Exodus vi��2�察�where God�察�in order to show the
singular grace bestowed upon Moses�察�says to him�此 �And I appeared unto
19
´ Page 20´
A Theologico´Political Treatise
Abraham�察�unto Isaac�察�and unto Jacob by the name of El Sadai ��A。 V。 God
Almighty���察�but by my name Jehovah was I not known to them; ´ for the
better understanding of which passage I may remark that El Sadai�察 �in
Hebrew�察�signifies the God who suffices�察�in that He gives to every man that
which suffices for him�察 �and�察 �although Sadai is often used by itself�察 �to
signify God�察�we cannot doubt that the word El ��God�察。�power�察�might���� is
everywhere understood。 ��16�� Furthermore�察 �we must note that Jehovah is
the only word found in Scripture with the meaning of the absolute essence
of God�察�without reference to created things。 ��17�� The Jews maintain�察�for
this reason�察�that this is�察�strictly speaking�察�the only name of God�察�that the
rest of the words used are merely titles�察�and�察�in truth�察�the other names of
God�察 �whether they be substantives or adjectives�察 �are merely attributive�察�
and belong to Him�察�in so far as He is conceived of in relation to created
things�察 �or manifested through them。 ��18�� Thus El�察 �or Eloah�察 �signifies
powerful�察 �as is well known�察 �and only applies to God in respect to His
supremacy�察�as when we call Paul an apostle�察�the faculties of his power are
set forth in an accompanying adjective�察�as El�察�great�察�awful�察�just�察�merciful�察�
&c。�察 �or else all are understood at once by the use of El in the plural
number�察�with a singular signification�察�an expression frequently adopted in
Scripture。
��19�� Now�察�as God tells Moses that He was not known to the patriarchs
by the name of Jehovah�察 �it follows that they were not cognizant of any
attribute of God which expresses His absolute essence�察 �but only of His
deeds and promises that is�察�of His power�察�as manifested in visible things。
��20�� God does not thus speak to Moses in order to accuse the patriarchs of
infidelity�察�but�察�on the contrary�察�as a means of extolling their belief and faith�察�
inasmuch as�察�though they possessed no extraordinary knowledge of God
��such as Moses had���察�they yet accepted His promises as fixed and certain�察�
whereas Moses�察 �though his thoughts about God were more exalted�察�
nevertheless doubted about the Divine promises�察�and complained to God
that�察 �instead of the promised deliverance�察 �the prospects of the Israelites
had darkened。
��21�� As the patriarchs did not know the distinctive name of God�察�and
as God mentions the fact to Moses�察 �in praise of their faith and single´
20
´ Page 21´
A Theologico´Political Treatise
heartedness�察�and in contrast t