madam how and lady why(裟健繁才山溺平)-及29准
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
does know�察�and knows a great deal�察�and very accurately�察�what he does not
know is the matter itself。 He will tell you wonderful things about oxygen
gashow the air is full of it�察�the water full of it�察�every living thing full of it�察�
how it changes hard bright steel into soft�察�foul rust�察�how a candle cannot
94
´ Page 95´
MADAM HOW AND LADY WHY
burn without it�察�or you live without it。 But what it is he knows not。
Will he ever know�拭�
That is Lady Why's concern�察�and not ours。 Meanwhile he has a right
to find out if he can。 But what do you want to ask him next�拭�
What�拭 �Oh� �What carbonic acid is。 He can tell you that。 Carbon
and oxygen gas。
But what is carbon�拭�
Nobody knows。
Why�察�here is this stupid Analysis at fault again。
Nay�察 �nay�察 �again。 Be patient with him。 If he cannot tell you what
carbon is�察�he can tell you what is carbon�察�which is well worth knowing。
He will tell you�察�for instance�察�that every time you breathe or speak�察�what
comes out of your mouth is carbonic acid�察�and that�察�if your breath comes
on a bit of slacked lime�察�it will begin to turn it back into the chalk from
which it was made�察 �and that�察 �if your breath comes on the leaves of a
growing plant�察�that leaf will take the carbon out of it�察�and turn it into wood。
And surely that is worth knowing��that you may be helping to make chalk�察�
or to make wood�察�every time you breathe。
Well�察�that is very curious。
But now�察�ask him�察�What is carbon�拭 �And he will tell you�察�that many
things are carbon。 A diamond is carbon�察�and so is blacklead�察�and so is
charcoal and coke�察�and coal in part�察�and wood in part。
What�拭 �Does Analysis say that a diamond and charcoal are the same
thing�拭�
Yes。
Then his way of taking things to pieces must be a very clumsy one�察�if
he can find out no difference between diamond and charcoal。
Well�察�perhaps it is�此 �but you must remember that�察�though he is very
oldas old as the first man who ever livedhe has only been at school for
the last three hundred years or so。 And remember�察�too�察�that he is not like
you�察�who have some one else to teach you。 He has had to teach himself�察�
and find out for himself�察�and make his own tools�察�and work in the dark
besides。 And I think it is very much to his credit that he ever found out
that diamond and charcoal were the same things。 You would never have
95
´ Page 96´
MADAM HOW AND LADY WHY
found it out for yourself�察�you will agree。
No�此 �but how did he do it�拭�
He taught a very famous chemist�察�Lavoisier�察 �about ninety years ago�察�
how to burn a diamond in oxygenand a very difficult trick that is�察�and
Lavoisier found that the diamond when burnt turned almost entirely into
carbonic acid and water�察�as blacklead and charcoal do�察�and more�察�that each
of them turned into the same quantity of carbonic acid�察�And so he knew�察�as
surely as man can know anything�察�that all these things�察�however different
to our eyes and fingers�察�are really made of the same thing��pure carbon。
But what makes them look and feel so different�拭�
That Analysis does not know yet。 Perhaps he will find out some day�察�
for he is very patient�察�and very diligent�察�as you ought to be。 Meanwhile�察�
be content with him�此 �remember that though he cannot see through a
milestone yet�察�he can see farther into one than his neighbours。 Indeed his
neighbours cannot see into a milestone at all�察�but only see the outside of it�察�
and know things only by rote�察 �like parrots�察 �without understanding what
they mean and how they are made。
So now remember that chalk is carbonate of lime�察�and that it is made
up of three things�察 �calcium�察 �oxygen�察 �and carbon�察 �and that therefore its
mark is CaCO��3���察�in Analysis's language�察�which I hope you will be able to
read some day。
But how is it that Analysis and Synthesis cannot take all this chalk to
pieces�察�and put it together again�拭�
Look here�察�what is that in the chalk�拭�
Oh� �a shepherd's crown�察�such as we often find in the gravel�察�only fresh
and white。
Well�察�you know what that was once。 I have often told you�此�a live
sea´egg�察�covered with prickles�察�which crawls at the bottom of the sea。
Well�察�I am sure that Master Synthesis could not put that together again�此�
and equally sure that Master Analysis might spend ages in taking it to
pieces�察�before he found out how it was made。 Andwe are lucky to´day�察�
for this lower chalk to the south has very few fossils in ithere is
something else which is not mere carbonate of lime。 Look at it。
A little cockle�察�something like a wrinkled hazel´nut。
96
´ Page 97´
MADAM HOW AND LADY WHY
No�察 �that is no cockle。 Madam How invented that ages and ages
before she thought of cockles�察�and the animal which lived inside that shell
was as different from a cockle´animal as a sparrow is from a dog。 That is
a Terebratula�察 �a gentleman of a very ancient and worn´out family。 He
and his kin swarmed in the old seas�察�even as far back as the time when the
rocks of the Welsh mountains were soft mud�察�as you will know when you
read that great book of Sir Roderick Murchison's�察�Siluria。 But as the ages
rolled on�察�they got fewer and fewer�察�these Terebratulae�察�and now there are
hardly any of them left�察�only six or seven sorts are left about these islands�察�
which cling to stones in deep water�察�and the first time I dredged two of
them out of Loch Fyne�察 �I looked at them with awe�察 �as on relics from
another world�察�which had lasted on through unnumbered ages and changes�察�
such as one's fancy could not grasp。
But you will agree that�察 �if Master Analysis took that shell to pieces�察�
Master Synthesis would not be likely to put it together again�察�much less to
put it together in the right way�察�in which Madam How made it。
And what was that�拭�
By making a living animal�察 �which went on growing�察 �that is�察 �making
itself�察�and making�察�as it grew�察�its shell to live in。 Synthesis has not found
out yet the first step towards doing that�察�and�察�as I believe�察�he never will。
But there would be no harm in his trying�拭�
Of course not。 Let everybody try to do everything they fancy。 Even if
they fail�察�they will have learnt at least that they cannot do it。
But nowand this is a secret which you would never find out for
yourself�察�at least without the help of a microscopethe greater part of this
lump of chalk is made up of things which neither Analysis can perfectly
take to pieces�察 �nor Synthesis put together again。 It is made of dead
organisms�察�that is�察�things which have been made by living creatures。 If
you washed and brushed that chalk into powder�察�you would find it full of
little things like the Dentalina in this drawing�察 �and many other curious
forms。 I will show you some under the microscope one day。
They are the shells of animals called Foraminifera�察�because the shells
of some of them are full of holes�察�through which they put out tiny arms。
So small they are and so many�察�that there may be�察�it is said�察�forty thousand
97
´ Page 98´
MADAM HOW AND LADY WHY
of them in a bit of chalk an inch every way。 In numbers past counting�察�
some whole�察�some broken�察�some ground to the finest powder�察�they make
up vast masses of England�察 �which are now chalk downs�察 �and in some
foreign countries they make up whole mountains。 Part of the building
stone of the Great Pyramid in Egypt is composed�察 �I am told�察�entirely of
them。
And how did they get into the chalk�拭�
Ah� �How indeed�拭 �Let us think。 The chalk must have been laid
down at the bottom of a sea�察�because there are sea´shells in it。 Besides�察�we
find little atomies exactly like these alive now in many seas�察�and therefore
it is fair to suppose these lived in the sea also。
Besides�察�they were not washed into the chalk by any sudden flood。 The
water in which they settled must have been