Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > history of philosophy >

µÚ76½Ú

history of philosophy-µÚ76½Ú

С˵£º history of philosophy ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



one¡¡subject¡¡has¡¡such¡¡and¡¡such¡¡an¡¡experience£»¡¡finds£»¡¡for¡¡instance£»¡¡in¡¡his¡¡religious¡¡feelings¡¡this
determination¡¡which¡¡inclines¡¡him¡¡to¡¡God£»¡¡while¡¡another¡¡subject¡¡has¡¡different¡¡experiences
altogether¡£¡¡We¡¡are¡¡in¡¡the¡¡habit¡¡of¡¡allowing¡¡one¡¡thing¡¡to¡¡be¡¡just¡¡and¡¡moral£»¡¡others¡¡have¡¡another
mode¡¡of¡¡regarding¡¡it¡£¡¡Hence¡¡if¡¡the¡¡truth¡¡depends¡¡upon¡¡experience£»¡¡the¡¡element¡¡of¡¡universality£»¡¡of
objectivity£»¡¡&c¡££»¡¡comes¡¡from¡¡elsewhere£»¡¡or¡¡is¡¡not¡¡justified¡¡by¡¡experience¡£¡¡Hume¡¡thus¡¡declared¡¡this
sort¡¡of¡¡universality£»¡¡as¡¡he¡¡declared¡¡necessity£»¡¡to¡¡be¡¡rather¡¡subjectively¡¡than¡¡objectively¡¡existent£»¡¡for
custom¡¡is¡¡just¡¡a¡¡subjective¡¡universality¡¡of¡¡this¡¡kind¡£¡¡This¡¡is¡¡an¡¡important¡¡and¡¡acute¡¡observation¡¡in
relation¡¡to¡¡experience¡¡looked¡¡at¡¡as¡¡the¡¡source¡¡of¡¡knowledge£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡is¡¡from¡¡this¡¡point¡¡that¡¡the
Kantian¡¡reflection¡¡now¡¡begins¡£

Hume¡¡£¨Essays¡¡and¡¡Treatises¡¡on¡¡several¡¡subjects£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡111¡£¡¡Sect¡£¡¡8£»¡¡11£©¡¡then¡¡extended¡¡his
scepticism¡¡to¡¡the¡¡conceptions¡¡and¡¡doctrines¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡and¡¡necessity£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡the¡¡proofs¡¡of¡¡the
existence¡¡of¡¡God£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡scepticism¡¡here¡¡possesses¡¡a¡¡wide¡¡field¡£¡¡To¡¡such¡¡a¡¡system¡¡of
reasoning¡¡from¡¡thoughts¡¡and¡¡possibilities¡¡another¡¡method¡¡of¡¡reasoning¡¡may¡¡again¡¡be¡¡opposed£»¡¡and
this¡¡reasoning¡¡is¡¡no¡¡better¡¡than¡¡the¡¡other¡£¡¡What¡¡is¡¡said¡¡to¡¡be¡¡metaphysically¡¡established¡¡regarding
immortality£»¡¡God£»¡¡nature£»¡¡&c¡££»¡¡lacks¡¡a¡¡real¡¡ground¡¡for¡¡resting¡¡upon£»¡¡such¡¡as¡¡is¡¡professed¡¡to¡¡be
given£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡inferences¡¡on¡¡which¡¡men¡¡ground¡¡their¡¡proofs¡¡are¡¡subjectively¡¡formed¡¡conceptions¡£
But¡¡where¡¡a¡¡universality¡¡is¡¡found£»¡¡it¡¡does¡¡not¡¡rest¡¡in¡¡the¡¡matter¡¡in¡¡itself£»¡¡but¡¡is¡¡simply¡¡a¡¡subjective
necessity¡¡which¡¡is¡¡really¡¡mere¡¡custom¡£¡¡Hence¡¡the¡¡result¡¡which¡¡Hume¡¡arrives¡¡at¡¡is¡¡necessarily
astonishment¡¡regarding¡¡the¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡human¡¡knowledge£»¡¡a¡¡general¡¡state¡¡of¡¡mistrust£»¡¡and¡¡a
sceptical¡¡indecision¡¡¡ª¡¡which¡¡indeed¡¡does¡¡not¡¡amount¡¡to¡¡much¡£¡¡The¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡human¡¡knowledge
regarding¡¡which¡¡Hume¡¡so¡¡much¡¡wonders£»¡¡he¡¡further¡¡describes¡¡as¡¡containing¡¡an¡¡antagonism
between¡¡reason¡¡and¡¡instinct£»¡¡this¡¡instinct£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡said£»¡¡which¡¡embraces¡¡many¡¡sorts¡¡of¡¡powers£»
inclinations£»¡¡&c¡££»¡¡deceives¡¡us¡¡in¡¡many¡¡different¡¡ways£»¡¡and¡¡reason¡¡demonstrates¡¡this¡£¡¡But¡¡on¡¡the
other¡¡side¡¡it¡¡is¡¡empty£»¡¡without¡¡content¡¡or¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡its¡¡own£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡a¡¡content¡¡is¡¡in¡¡question¡¡at¡¡all£»
it¡¡must¡¡keep¡¡to¡¡those¡¡inclinations¡£¡¡In¡¡itself¡¡reason¡¡thus¡¡has¡¡no¡¡criterion¡¡whereby¡¡the¡¡antagonism
between¡¡individual¡¡desires£»¡¡and¡¡between¡¡itself¡¡and¡¡the¡¡desires£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡settled¡£¡¡£¨8£©¡¡Thus¡¡everything
appears¡¡in¡¡the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡an¡¡irrational¡¡existence¡¡devoid¡¡of¡¡thought£»¡¡the¡¡implicitly¡¡true¡¡and¡¡right¡¡is¡¡not¡¡in
thought£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡an¡¡instinct£»¡¡a¡¡desire¡£






1¡£¡¡Buhle£º¡¡Geschichte¡¡der¡¡neuern¡¡Philosophie£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡V¡£¡¡Sect¡£¡¡1£»¡¡pp¡£¡¡193¡­200¡£¡¡

2¡£¡¡Tennemann's¡¡Grundriss¡¡der¡¡Geschichte¡¡der¡¡Philosophie¡¡von¡¡Wendt¡¡£¨Leipzig£»¡¡1829£©£»¡¡¡ì¡¡370£»
pp¡£¡¡439£»¡¡440£»¡¡Hume£º¡¡Essays¡¡and¡¡Treatises¡¡on¡¡several¡¡subjects£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡III¡£¡¡containing¡¡an¡¡Inquiry
Concerning¡¡Human¡¡Understanding¡¡£¨London£»¡¡1770£©£»¡¡Sect¡£¡¡2¡£¡¡pp¡£¡¡21£»¡¡22£»¡¡Sect¡£¡¡4£»¡¡P¡£¡¡I¡£¡¡p¡£¡¡42£»
Tennemann£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡XI¡£¡¡pp¡£¡¡433£»¡¡434¡£¡¡

3¡£¡¡Hume£º¡¡op¡£¡¡cit¡££»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡III¡£¡¡Not¡£¡¡A¡£¡¡pp¡£¡¡283£»¡¡284¡£¡¡

4¡£¡¡Tennemann¡¡op¡£¡¡cit¡££»¡¡¡ì¡¡370£»¡¡p¡£¡¡440£»¡¡Hume£º¡¡op¡£¡¡cit¡££»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡III¡£¡¡Sect¡£¡¡4£»¡¡Pt¡£¡¡I¡£¡¡pp¡£¡¡43¡­45£»¡¡Sect¡£¡¡5£»
pp¡£¡¡66£»¡¡67£»¡¡Buhle£º¡¡Geschichte¡¡der¡¡neuern¡¡Philosophie£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡V¡£¡¡Sect¡£¡¡1£»¡¡pp¡£¡¡204£»¡¡205£»¡¡Tennemann£»
Vol¡£¡¡XI¡£¡¡pp¡£¡¡435£»¡¡436¡£¡¡

5¡£¡¡Hume£º¡¡op¡£¡¡cit¡££»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡III¡£¡¡Sect¡£¡¡vii¡£¡¡Pt¡£¡¡1£»¡¡pp¡£¡¡102£»¡¡103£»¡¡Pt¡£¡¡2£»¡¡pp¡£¡¡108£»¡¡109£»¡¡Sect¡£¡¡viii¡£¡¡pp¡£¡¡118£»
119¡£¡¡

6¡£¡¡Hume£º¡¡op¡£¡¡cit¡££»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡IV¡£¡¡containing¡¡an¡¡Inquiry¡¡concerning¡¡the¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡morals£»¡¡Sect¡£¡¡1£»¡¡p¡£¡¡4£»
Appendix¡¡I¡£¡¡p¡£¡¡170¡£¡¡

7¡£¡¡Buhle£º¡¡op¡£¡¡cit¡££»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡V¡£¡¡Sect¡£¡¡1£»¡¡pp¡£¡¡230£»¡¡231£»¡¡cf¡£¡¡Hume£»¡¡ibidem£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡III¡£¡¡Sect¡£¡¡12£»¡¡P¡£¡¡II¡£¡¡p¡£
221£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡IV¡££»¡¡An¡¡Inquiry£»¡¡&c¡££»¡¡Sect¡£¡¡4£»¡¡pp¡£¡¡62¡­65£»¡¡A¡¡dialogue£»¡¡pp¡£¡¡235£»¡¡236£»¡¡&c¡££»¡¡&c¡£¡¡

8¡£¡¡Hume£º¡¡op¡£¡¡cit¡£¡£¡¡Vol¡£¡¡III¡£¡¡Sect¡£¡¡12£»¡¡Pt¡£¡¡I¡£¡¡pp¡£¡¡217£»¡¡218£»¡¡Not¡£¡¡N¡£¡¡pp¡£¡¡296£»¡¡297£»¡¡Buhle£º
Geschichte¡¡der¡¡neuern¡¡Philosophie£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡V¡£¡¡Sect¡£¡¡1£»¡¡p¡£¡¡210¡£¡¡





Section¡¡Two£º¡¡Period¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Thinking¡¡Understanding
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Chapter¡¡II¡£¡¡¡ª¡¡Transition¡¡Period
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡B¡£¡¡Scottish¡¡Philosophy

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡1¡£¡¡THOMAS¡¡REID¡£

Thomas¡¡Reid£»¡¡born¡¡in¡¡1710£»¡¡died¡¡as¡¡a¡¡professor¡¡in¡¡Glasgow¡¡in¡¡1796¡££¨1£©¡¡He¡¡maintained¡¡the
principle¡¡of¡¡common¡­sense¡£¡¡His¡¡endeavour¡¡was¡¡to¡¡discover¡¡the¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡knowledge£»¡¡and¡¡the
following¡¡are¡¡his¡¡conclusions£º¡¡¡¨£¨a£©¡¡There¡¡are¡¡certain¡¡undemonstrated¡¡and¡¡undemonstrable
fundamental¡¡truths¡¡which¡¡common¡­sense¡¡begets¡¡and¡¡recognizes¡¡as¡¡immediately¡¡conclusive¡¡and
absolute¡£¡¨¡¡This¡¡hence¡¡constitutes¡¡an¡¡immediate¡¡knowledge£»¡¡in¡¡it¡¡an¡¡inward¡¡independent¡¡source¡¡is
set¡¡forth¡¡which¡¡is¡¡hereby¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡religion¡¡as¡¡revealed¡£¡¡¡¨£¨b£©¡¡These¡¡immediate¡¡truths¡¡require¡¡no
support¡¡from¡¡any¡¡elaborated¡¡science£»¡¡nor¡¡do¡¡they¡¡submit¡¡to¡¡its¡¡criticism£»¡¨¡¡they¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡criticized
by¡¡philosophy¡£¡¡¡¨£¨c£©¡¡Philosophy¡¡itself¡¡has¡¡no¡¡root¡¡other¡¡than¡¡that¡¡of¡¡an¡¡immediate£»¡¡self¡­enlightening
truth£»¡¡whatever¡¡contradicts¡¡such¡¡truth¡¡is¡¡in¡¡itself¡¡false£»¡¡contradictory£»¡¡and¡¡absurd¡£¡¨¡¡This¡¡is¡¡true¡¡for
knowledge¡¡and¡¡¡¨£¨d£©¡¡Morality£»¡¡the¡¡individual¡¡is¡¡moral¡¡if¡¡he¡¡acts¡¡in¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡the¡¡perfect
principles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡perfection¡¡of¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡and¡¡with¡¡his¡¡own¡¡duty¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is¡¡known¡¡to¡¡him¡£¡¨£¨2£©¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡2¡£¡¡JAMES¡¡BEATTIE¡£

James¡¡Beattie£»¡¡born¡¡1735£»¡¡was¡¡a¡¡professor¡¡of¡¡moral¡¡philosophy¡¡in¡¡Edinburgh¡¡and¡¡Aberdeen£»¡¡and
died¡¡in¡¡1803¡£¡¡He¡¡likewise¡¡made¡¡common¡­sense¡¡the¡¡source¡¡of¡¡all¡¡knowledge¡£¡¡¡¨The¡¡common¡­sense
of¡¡the¡¡plain¡¡human¡¡understanding¡¡is¡¡the¡¡source¡¡of¡¡all¡¡morality£»¡¡of¡¡all¡¡religion£»¡¡and¡¡all¡¡certainty¡£¡¡The
confirmation¡¡of¡¡common¡­sense¡¡must¡¡be¡¡added¡¡to¡¡the¡¡testimony¡¡of¡¡our¡¡senses¡£¡¡The¡¡truth¡¡is¡¡what¡¡the
necessities¡¡of¡¡my¡¡nature¡¡call¡¡upon¡¡me¡¡to¡¡believe¡£¡¡Belief¡¡signifies¡¡conviction¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡truths
which¡¡are¡¡certain£»¡¡in¡¡that¡¡of¡¡those¡¡which¡¡are¡¡probable£»¡¡approbation¡£¡¡The¡¡truth¡¡which¡¡is¡¡certain¡¡is
known¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡intuition£»¡¡the¡¡probable¡¡truth¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡proofs¡£¡¨£¨3£©¡¡Such¡¡convictions¡¡as¡¡are
quite¡¡certain¡¡form¡¡the¡¡basis¡¡of¡¡actions¡£



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡3¡£¡¡JAMES¡¡OSWALD¡£

James¡¡Oswald£»¡¡a¡¡Scottish¡¡clergyman£»¡¡made¡¡use¡¡of¡¡an¡¡expression¡¡which¡¡indicates¡¡that¡¡we¡¡have¡¡the
principles¡¡just¡¡mentioned¡¡as¡¡facts¡¡existing¡¡within¡¡us¡££¨4£©¡¡¡¨The¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Divine¡¡Being¡¡is
£¨according¡¡to¡¡him£©¡¡a¡¡fact¡¡absolutely¡¡raised¡¡above¡¡all¡¡reasoning¡¡and¡¡all¡¡doubt£»¡¡and¡¡immediately
certain¡¡for¡¡the¡¡common¡­sense¡¡of¡¡morality¡£¡¨£¨5£©¡¡The¡¡same¡¡principle¡¡was¡¡likewise¡¡established¡¡in
Germany¡¡at¡¡this¡¡time¡¡¡­¡¡an¡¡inward¡¡revelation£»¡¡a¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conscience£»¡¡and¡¡specially¡¡of¡¡God
and¡¡His¡¡Being¡£



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡4¡£¡¡DUGALD¡¡STEWART¡£

To¡¡this¡¡school¡¡also¡¡belong¡¡Dugald¡¡Stewart£»¡¡Edward¡¡Search£»£¨9£©¡¡Ferguson£»¡¡and¡¡Hutcheson£»¡¡most¡¡of
whom¡¡have¡¡written¡¡on¡¡morals¡£¡¡The¡¡political¡¡economist¡¡Adam¡¡Smith¡¡from¡¡this¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡is
likewise¡¡a¡¡philosopher£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡best¡¡known¡¡of¡¡them¡¡all¡£¡¡This¡¡Scottish¡¡philosophy¡¡is¡¡now¡¡given¡¡forth
in¡¡Germany¡¡as¡¡something¡¡new¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡a¡¡popular¡¡philosophy£»¡¡which£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡one¡¡hand£»¡¡has¡¡the¡¡great
merit¡¡of¡¡seeking¡¡in¡¡man£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡his¡¡consciousness£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡source¡¡of¡¡all¡¡that¡¡should¡¡be¡¡held¡¡by¡¡him
as¡¡true£»¡¡the¡¡immanence¡¡of¡¡what¡¡should¡¡be¡¡by¡¡him¡¡esteemed¡£¡¡The¡¡content¡¡is¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡a
concrete¡¡content£»¡¡in¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡degree£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡antithesis¡¡of¡¡metaphysics¡¡proper£»¡¡of¡¡the¡¡wandering
about¡¡in¡¡abstract¡¡determinations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡£¡¡Of¡¡these¡¡Scots£»¡¡Dugald¡¡Stewart£»¡¡who¡¡is
living¡¡still£»£¨10£©¡¡appears¡¡to¡¡be¡¡the¡¡last¡¡and¡¡least¡¡significant£»¡¡in¡¡them¡¡all¡¡there¡¡is¡¡the¡¡same
ground¡­work¡¡to¡¡be¡¡found£»¡¡the¡¡same¡¡circle¡¡of¡¡reflection£»¡¡namely£»¡¡an¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡philosophy£»¡¡though¡¡not
one¡¡which¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡pursued¡¡in¡¡a¡¡speculative¡¡way¡£¡¡The¡¡general¡¡idea¡¡which¡¡pervades¡¡their¡¡principle¡¡is
that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡healthy¡¡human¡¡understanding£»¡¡to¡¡this¡¡they¡¡have¡¡added¡¡benevolent¡¡desires£»¡¡sympathy£»¡¡a
moral¡¡sense£»¡¡and¡¡from¡¡such¡¡grounds¡¡composed¡¡very¡¡excellent¡¡moral¡¡writings¡£¡¡That¡¡is¡¡certainly¡¡all
very¡¡well¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡understand¡¡approximately£»¡¡up¡¡to¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡degree¡¡of¡¡culture£»¡¡what¡¡universal
thoughts¡¡are£»¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡narrate¡¡their¡¡history£»¡¡to¡¡appeal¡¡to¡¡examples£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡explain¡¡them£»¡¡but
further¡¡it¡¡does¡¡not¡¡extend¡£

In¡¡more¡¡recent¡¡times¡¡this¡¡Scottish¡¡philosophy¡¡has¡¡passed¡¡to¡¡France£»¡¡and¡¡Professor¡¡Royer¡­Collard£»
now¡¡president¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Second¡¡Chamber£»£¨11£©¡¡as¡¡also¡¡his¡¡disciple£»¡¡Jouffroy£»¡¡in¡¡conformity¡¡with¡¡it£»
pass¡¡from¡¡the¡¡facts¡¡of¡¡consciousness¡¡through¡¡cultured¡¡reasoning¡¡and¡¡experience£»¡¡to¡¡a¡¡further¡¡stage
in¡¡development¡£¡¡What¡¡by¡¡the¡¡French¡¡is¡¡called¡¡Id¨¦ologie¡¡£¨supra£»¡¡p¡£¡¡308£©¡¡has¡¡also¡¡its¡¡place¡¡here£»¡¡it
is¡¡abstract¡¡metaphysics£»¡¡in¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is¡¡an¡¡enumeration¡¡and¡¡analysis¡¡of¡¡the¡¡most¡¡simple
thought¡­determinations¡£¡¡They¡¡are¡¡not¡¡treated¡¡dialectically£»¡¡but¡¡from¡¡our¡¡reflection£»¡¡from¡¡our
thoughts£»¡¡the¡¡material¡¡is¡¡derived£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡this¡¡the¡¡determinations¡¡therein¡¡contained¡¡are¡¡demonstrated¡£






1¡£¡¡Tennemann's¡¡Grundriss¡¡der¡¡Geschichte¡¡der¡¡Philosophie¡¡von¡¡Wendt£»¡¡¡ì¡¡371£»¡¡p¡£¡¡442¡£
2¡£¡¡Rixner£º¡¡Handbuch¡¡der¡¡Geschicte¡¡der¡¡Philosophie£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡III¡£¡¡¡ì¡¡119£»¡¡p¡£¡¡259£»¡¡ct¡£¡¡Thomas¡¡Reid£»¡¡An
Inquiry¡¡into¡¡the¡¡human¡¡mind¡¡on¡¡the¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡common¡¡sense¡¡£¨Edinburgh£»¡¡1810£©£»¡¡chap¡£¡¡i¡£¡¡Sect¡£
4£»¡¡pp¡£¡¡19£»¡¡20¡¡£¨translated¡¡into¡¡German£»¡¡Leipzig£»¡¡1782£»¡¡pp¡£¡¡17£»¡¡18£©£»¡¡chap¡£¡¡vi¡£¡¡Sect¡£¡¡20£»¡¡pp¡£
372¡­375¡¡£¨pp¡£¡¡310£»¡¡311£©£»¡¡&c¡£

3¡£¡¡Rixner£º¡¡Handbuch¡¡der¡¡Geschichte¡¡der¡¡Philosophie£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡III¡£¡¡¡ì¡¡120£»¡¡pp¡£¡¡261£»¡¡262£»¡¡cf¡£¡¡James
Beattie£º¡¡Essays¡¡on¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡and¡¡immutability¡¡of¡¡Truth£»¡¡&c¡£¡¡£¨Edinburh£»¡¡1772£©£»¡¡Pt¡£¡¡I

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ