wgolding.lordoftheflies-第45节

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


st；　and　defined　in　a　wonderful　narrative　sequence。　The　emblem　of　this　evil　society　is　the　head　of　a　dead　pig；　fixed；　as　a　sacrifice；　on　the　end　of　a　stick　and　animated　by　flies　and　by　the　imagination　of　the　voyant；　Simon。
　Simon　is　Golding's　first　〃saint；　and　a　most　important　figure。〃　He　is　for　the　illiterate　a　proof　of　the　existence　of　God　because　the　illiterate　（to　whom　we　are　tacitly　but　unmistakably　expected　to　attribute　a　correct　insight　here）　will　say；　〃Well；　a　person　like　this　cannot　exist　without　a　good　God。〃　For　Simon　〃voluntarily　embraces　the　beast　。　。　。　and　tries　to　get　rid　of　him。〃　What　he　understands…and　this　is　wisdom　Golding　treats　with　awe…is　that　evil　is　〃only　us。〃　He　climbs　up　to　where　the　dead　fire　is　dominated　by　the　beast；　a　dead　airman　in　a　parachute；　discovers　what　this　terrible　thing　really　is；　and　rushes　off　with　the　good　news　to　the　beach；　where　the　maddened　boys　at　their　beast…slaying　ritual　mistake　Simon　himself　for　the　beast　and　kill　him。　As　Piggy；　the　dull　practical　intelligence；　is　reduced　to　blindness　and　futility；　so　Simon；　the　visionary；　is　murdered　before　he　can　municate　his　fortable　knowledge。4　Finally；　the　whole　Paradise　is　destroyed　under　the　puzzled　eyes　of　an　adult　observer。　Boys　will　be　boys。
　The　difference　of　this　world　from　Ballantyne's　simpler　construction　from　similar　materials　is　not　merely　a　matter　of　inparability　of　the　two　talents　at　work；　our　minds　have；　in　general；　darker　needs　and　obscurer　forts。　It　would　be　absurd　to　suppose　that　the　change　has　impoverished　us；　but　it　has　seemed　to　divide　our　world　into　〃two　cultures〃…the　followers　of　Jack　and　the　admirers　of　Simon；　those　who　build　fortresses　and　those　who　want　to　name　the　beast。
　
　4。Cf。　Donald　R。　Soangler's　〃Simon〃　on　pp。　211…215　in　this　volume　and　also　Golding's　remarks　on　Simon　in　the　interview　with　James　Keating；　p。　192。…Eds。
　
　Lord　of　the　Flies　〃was　worked　out　carefully　in　every　possible　way；〃5　and　its　author　holds　that　the　〃programme〃　of　the　book　is　its　meaning。　He　rejects　Lawrence's　doctrine；　〃Never　trust　the　artist；　trust　the　tale〃　and　its　consequence；　〃the　proper　function　of　the　critic　is　to　save　the　tale　from　the　artist。〃　He　is　wrong；　I　think；　insofar　as　the　book　differs　from　its　programme　there　is；　as　a　matter　of　mon　sense；　material　over　which　the　writer　has　no　absolute　authority。　This　means　not　only　that　there　are　possible　readings　which　he　cannot　veto；　but　even　that　some　of　his　own　views　on　the　book　may　be　in　a　sense　wrong。　The　interpretation　of　the　dead　parachutist　is　an　example。　This　began　in　the　〃programme〃　as　straight　allegory；　Golding　says　that　this　dead　man　〃is〃　History。6　〃All　that　we　can　give　our　children〃　in　their　trouble　is　this　monstrous　dead　adult；　who's　〃dead；　but　won't　lie　down〃；　an　ugly　emblem　of　war　and　decay　that　broods　over　the　paradise　and　provides　the　only　objective　equivalent　for　the　beasts　the　boys　imagine。　Now　this　limited　allegory　（I　may　even　have　expanded　it　in　the　telling）　seems　to　me　not　to　have　got　out　of　the　〃programme〃　into　the　book；　what　does　get　in　is　more　valuable　because　more　like　myth…　capable；　that　is；　of　more　various　interpretation　than　the　rigidity　of　Golding's　scheme　allows。　And　in　writing　of　this　kind　all　depends　upon　the　author's　mythopoeic　power　to　transcend　the　〃programme。〃
　
　5。Golding　makes　this　statement　in　the　interview　with　Frank　Kermode；　The　Meaning　of　It　All。〃　See　above；　p。　201。…Eds。
　6。In　the　interview　〃The　Meaning　of　It　All；〃　p。　200。…Eds。
　
　
　
　
　
　Introduction1
　E。　M。　FORSTER
　
　It　is　a　pleasure　and　an　honour　to　write　an　introduction　to　this　remarkable　book；　but　there　is　also　a　difficulty；　for　the　reason　that　the　book　contains　surprises；　and　its　reader　ought　to　encounter　them　for　himself。　If　he　knows　too　much　he　will　lean　back　placently。　And　placency　is　not　a　quality　that　Mr。　Golding　values。　The　universe；　in　his　view；　secretes　something　that　we　do　not　expect　and　shall　probably　dislike；　and　he　here　presents　the　universe；　under　the　guise　of　a　school　adventure　story　on　a　coral　island。
　How　romantically　it　starts！　Several　bunches　of　boys　are　being　evacuated　during　a　war。　Their　plane　is　shot　down；　but　the　〃tube〃　in　which　they　are　packed　is　released；　falls　on　an　island；　and　having　peppered　them　over　the　jungle　slides　into　the　sea。　None　of　them　are　hurt；　and　presently　they　collect　and　prepare　to　have　a　high　old　time。　A　most　improbable　start　But　Mr。　Golding's　magic　is　already　at　work　and　he　persuades　us　to　accept　it。　And　though　the　situation　is　improbable　the　boys　are　not。　He　understands　them　thoroughly；　partly　through　innate　sympathy；　partly　because　he　has　spent　much　of　his　Me　teaching。　He　makes　us　feel　at　once　that　we　are　with　real　human　beings；　even　if　they　are　small　ones；　and　thus　lays　a　solid　foundation　for　the　horrors　to　e。
　Meet　three　boys。
　Ralph　is　aged　a　little　over　twelve。　He　is　fair　and　well　built；　might　grow　into　a　boxer　but　never　into　a　devil；　for　he
　
　1。　Mr。　Forster's　Introduction　appears　in　Lord　of　the　Flies；　New　York：　Coward…McCann；　Inc。；　1962。　It　is　reprinted　here　by　permission　of　the　publisher。
　
　is　sunny　and　decent；　sensible；　considerate。　He　doesn't　understand　a　lot；　but　has　two　things　clear：　firstly；　they　will　soon　be　rescued…why；　his　daddy　is　in　the　Navy！…and　secondly；　until　they　are　rescued　they　must　hang　together。　It　is　he　who　finds　the　conch　and　arranges　that　when　there　is　a　meeting　he　who　holds　the　conch　shall　speak。　He　is　chosen　as　leader。　He　is　democracy。　And　as　long　as　the　conch　remains；　there　is　some　semblance　of　cooperation。　But　it　gets　smashed。
　Meet　Piggy。
　Piggy　is　stout；　asthmatic；　shortsighted；　underprivileged　and　wise。　He　is　the　brains　of　the　party。　It　is　the　lenses　of　his　spectacles　that　kindle　fire。　He　also　possesses　the　wisdom　of　the　heart。　He　is　loyal　to　Ralph；　and　tries　to　stop　him　from　making　mistakes；　for　he　knows　where　mistakes　may　lead　to　in　an　unknown　island。　He　knows　that　nothing　is　safe；　nothing　is　neatly　ticketed。　He　is　the　human　spirit；　aware　that　the　universe　has　not　been　created　for　his　convenience；2　and　doing　the　best　he　can。　And　as　long　as　he　survives　there　is　some　semblance　of　intelligence。　But　he　too　gets　smashed。　He　hurtles　through　the　air　under　a　rock　dislodged　by　savages。　His　skull　cracks　and　his　brains　spill　out。
　Meet　Jack。
　Jack　is　head　of　a　choir…a　bizarre　assignment　considering　his　destiny。　He　marches　them　two　and　two　up　the　sundrenched　beach。　He　loves　adventure；　excitement；　foraging　in　groups；　orders　when　issued　by　himself；　and　though　he　does　not　yet　know　it　and　shrinks　from　it　the　first　time；　he　loves　shedding　blood。　Ralph　he　rather　likes；　and　the　liking　is　mutual。　Piggy　he　despises　and　insults。　He　is　dictatorship　versus　democracy。　It　is　possible　to　read　the　book　at　a　political　level；　and　to　see　in　its　tragic　trend　the　tragedy　of　our　inter…war　world。　There　is　no　doubt　as　to　whose　side　the　author　is　on　here。　He　is　on　Ralph's。　But　if　one　shifts　the
　
　2。While　there　is　no　question　as　to　Piggy's　intelligence；　one　must　not　overestimate　the　range　of　his　awareness。　His　physical　deficiencies　suggest　the　weakness　in　his　point　of　view。　Piggy　denies　the　existence　of　the　beast　and　insists　that　〃life　is　scientific〃；　even　after　the　triumph　of　the　hunters；　he　expects　to　enter　Jack's　fortress　and　reason　with　him　for　return　or　the　bifocals。　Like　all　of　Golding's　rationalists；　Piggy　has　a　one…dimensional　view　of　human　nature：　he　fails　to　perceive　〃the　darkness　of　man's　heart。〃…Eds。
　
　vision　to　a　still　deeper　level…the　psychological…he　is　on　the　side　of　Piggy。　Piggy　knows　that　things　mayn't　go　well　because　he　knows　what　boys　are；　and　he　knows　that　the　island；　for　all　its　apparent　friendliness；　is　equivocal。
　The　hideous　accidents　that　promote　the　reversion　to　savagery　fill　most　of　the　book；　and　the　reader　must　be　left　to　endure　them…and　also　to　embrace　them；　for　somehow　or　other　they　are　entangled　with　beauty。　The　greatness　of　the　vision　transcends　what　is　visible。　At　the　close；　when　the　boys　are　duly　rescued　by　the　trim　British　cruiser；　we　find　ourselves　on　their　side。　We　have　shared　their　experience　and　resent　the　smug　cheeriness　of　their　rescuers。　The　naval　officer　is　a　bit　disappointed　with　what　he　finds…everyone　filthy　dirty；　swollen　bellies；　faces　daubed　with　clay；　two　missing　at　least　and　the　island　afire。　It　ought　to　have　been　more　like　Coral　Island；　he　suggests。
　
　Ralph　looked　at　him　dumbly。　For　a　moment　he　had　a　fleeting　picture　of　the　strange　glamour　that　had　once　invested　the　beaches。　But　the　island　was　scorched　up　like　dead　wood…Simon　was　dead…and　Jack　had　。　；　。　The　tears　began　to　flow　and　sobs　shook　him。　He　gave　himself　up　to　them　now　for　the　first　time　on　the　island；　great；　shuddering　spasms　of　grief　that　seemed　to　wrench　his　whole　body。　His　voice　rose　under　the　black　smoke　before　the　burning　wreckage　of　the　island；　and　infected　by　that　emotion；　the　other　little　boys　began　to　shake　and　sob　too。　And　in　the　middle　of　them；　with　filthy　body；　matted　hair；　and　unwiped　nose；　Ralph　wept　for　the　end　of　innocence；　the　darkness　of　man's　heart；　and　the　fall　through　the　air　of　the　true；　wise　friend　called　Piggy。
　
　This　passage…so　pathetic…is　also　revealing。　Phrases　like　〃the　end　of　innocence〃　and　〃the　darkness　of　man's　heart〃　show　us　the　author's