Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > the fathers of the constitution >

µÚ10½Ú

the fathers of the constitution-µÚ10½Ú

С˵£º the fathers of the constitution ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



ally¡¡acceptable¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡interesting¡¡to¡¡find¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Articles¡¡of¡¡Confederation¡¡£¨Article¡¡XI£©¡¡that£»¡¡¡¨Canada¡¡acceding¡¡to¡¡this¡¡confederation£»¡¡and¡¡joining¡¡in¡¡the¡¡measures¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States£»¡¡shall¡¡be¡¡admitted¡¡into£»¡¡and¡¡entitled¡¡to¡¡all¡¡the¡¡advantages¡¡of¡¡this¡¡Union£º¡¡but¡¡no¡¡other¡¡colony¡¡shall¡¡be¡¡admitted¡¡into¡¡the¡¡same¡¡unless¡¡such¡¡admission¡¡be¡¡agreed¡¡to¡¡by¡¡nine¡¡States¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡real¡¡importance¡¡of¡¡this¡¡article¡¡lay¡¡in¡¡the¡¡suggestion¡¡of¡¡an¡¡enlargement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Confederation¡£¡¡The¡¡Confederation¡¡was¡¡never¡¡intended¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡union¡¡of¡¡only¡¡thirteen¡¡States¡£¡¡Before¡¡the¡¡cession¡¡of¡¡their¡¡western¡¡claims¡¡it¡¡seemed¡¡to¡¡be¡¡inevitable¡¡that¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡States¡¡should¡¡be¡¡broken¡¡up¡¡into¡¡several¡¡units¡£¡¡At¡¡the¡¡very¡¡time¡¡that¡¡the¡¡formation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Confederation¡¡was¡¡under¡¡discussion¡¡Vermont¡¡issued¡¡a¡¡declaration¡¡of¡¡independence¡¡from¡¡New¡¡York¡¡and¡¡New¡¡Hampshire£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡expectation¡¡of¡¡being¡¡admitted¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Union¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡impolitic¡¡to¡¡recognize¡¡the¡¡appeal¡¡at¡¡that¡¡time£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡have¡¡been¡¡generally¡¡understood¡¡that¡¡sooner¡¡or¡¡later¡¡Vermont¡¡would¡¡come¡¡in¡¡as¡¡a¡¡full¡­fledged¡¡State¡£¡¡It¡¡might¡¡have¡¡been¡¡a¡¡revolutionary¡¡suggestion¡¡by¡¡Maryland£»¡¡when¡¡the¡¡cession¡¡of¡¡western¡¡lands¡¡was¡¡under¡¡discussion£»¡¡that¡¡Congress¡¡should¡¡have¡¡sole¡¡power¡¡to¡¡fix¡¡the¡¡western¡¡boundaries¡¡of¡¡the¡¡States£»¡¡but¡¡her¡¡further¡¡proposal¡¡was¡¡not¡¡even¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡radical£»¡¡that¡¡Congress¡¡should¡¡¡¨lay¡¡out¡¡the¡¡land¡¡beyond¡¡the¡¡boundaries¡¡so¡¡ascertained¡¡into¡¡separate¡¡and¡¡independent¡¡states¡£¡¨¡¡It¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡have¡¡been¡¡taken¡¡as¡¡a¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡course¡¡in¡¡the¡¡procedure¡¡of¡¡Congress¡¡and¡¡was¡¡accepted¡¡by¡¡the¡¡States¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡was¡¡one¡¡thing£»¡¡its¡¡carrying¡¡out¡¡was¡¡quite¡¡another¡£¡¡Here¡¡was¡¡a¡¡great¡¡extent¡¡of¡¡western¡¡territory¡¡which¡¡would¡¡be¡¡valuable¡¡only¡¡as¡¡it¡¡could¡¡be¡¡sold¡¡to¡¡prospective¡¡settlers¡£¡¡One¡¡of¡¡the¡¡first¡¡things¡¡these¡¡settlers¡¡would¡¡demand¡¡was¡¡protectionprotection¡¡against¡¡the¡¡Indians£»¡¡possibly¡¡also¡¡against¡¡the¡¡British¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Spanish£»¡¡and¡¡protection¡¡in¡¡their¡¡ordinary¡¡civil¡¡life¡£¡¡The¡¡former¡¡was¡¡a¡¡detail¡¡of¡¡military¡¡organization¡¡and¡¡was¡¡in¡¡due¡¡time¡¡provided¡¡by¡¡the¡¡establishment¡¡of¡¡military¡¡forts¡¡and¡¡garrisons£»¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡was¡¡the¡¡problem¡¡which¡¡Jefferson's¡¡committee¡¡was¡¡attempting¡¡to¡¡solve¡£¡¡The¡¡Ordinance¡¡of¡¡1784¡¡disregarded¡¡the¡¡natural¡¡physical¡¡features¡¡of¡¡the¡¡western¡¡country¡¡and£»¡¡by¡¡degrees¡¡of¡¡latitude¡¡and¡¡meridians¡¡of¡¡longitude£»¡¡arbitrarily¡¡divided¡¡the¡¡public¡¡domain¡¡into¡¡rectangular¡¡districts£»¡¡to¡¡the¡¡first¡¡of¡¡which¡¡the¡¡following¡¡names¡¡were¡¡applied£º¡¡Sylvania£»¡¡Michigania£»¡¡Cherronesus£»¡¡Assenisipia£»¡¡Metropotamia£»¡¡Illinoia£»¡¡Saratoga£»¡¡Washington£»¡¡Polypotamia£»¡¡Pelisipia¡£¡¡The¡¡amusement¡¡which¡¡this¡¡absurd¡¡and¡¡thoroughly¡¡Jeffersonian¡¡nomenclature¡¡is¡¡bound¡¡to¡¡cause¡¡ought¡¡not¡¡to¡¡detract¡¡from¡¡the¡¡really¡¡important¡¡features¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Ordinance¡£¡¡In¡¡each¡¡of¡¡the¡¡districts¡¡into¡¡which¡¡the¡¡country¡¡was¡¡divided¡¡the¡¡settlers¡¡might¡¡be¡¡authorized¡¡by¡¡Congress£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡establishing¡¡a¡¡temporary¡¡government£»¡¡to¡¡adopt¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡and¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡any¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡original¡¡States¡£¡¡When¡¡any¡¡such¡¡area¡¡should¡¡have¡¡twenty¡¡thousand¡¡free¡¡inhabitants¡¡it¡¡might¡¡receive¡¡authority¡¡from¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡establish¡¡a¡¡permanent¡¡constitution¡¡and¡¡government¡¡and¡¡should¡¡be¡¡entitled¡¡to¡¡a¡¡representative¡¡in¡¡Congress¡¡with¡¡the¡¡right¡¡of¡¡debating¡¡but¡¡not¡¡of¡¡voting¡£¡¡And¡¡finally£»¡¡when¡¡the¡¡inhabitants¡¡of¡¡any¡¡one¡¡of¡¡these¡¡districts¡¡should¡¡equal¡¡in¡¡number¡¡those¡¡of¡¡the¡¡least¡¡populous¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thirteen¡¡original¡¡States£»¡¡their¡¡delegates¡¡should¡¡be¡¡admitted¡¡into¡¡Congress¡¡on¡¡an¡¡equal¡¡footing¡£¡¡Jefferson's¡¡ordinance£»¡¡though¡¡adopted£»¡¡was¡¡never¡¡put¡¡into¡¡operation¡£¡¡Various¡¡explanations¡¡have¡¡been¡¡offered¡¡for¡¡this¡¡failure¡¡to¡¡give¡¡it¡¡a¡¡fair¡¡trial¡£¡¡It¡¡has¡¡been¡¡said¡¡that¡¡Jefferson¡¡himself¡¡was¡¡to¡¡blame¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡original¡¡draft¡¡of¡¡his¡¡ordinance¡¡Jefferson¡¡had¡¡provided¡¡for¡¡the¡¡abolition¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡new¡¡States¡¡after¡¡the¡¡year¡¡1800£»¡¡and¡¡when¡¡Congress¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡accept¡¡this¡¡clause¡¡Jefferson£»¡¡in¡¡a¡¡manner¡¡quite¡¡characteristic£»¡¡seemed¡¡to¡¡lose¡¡all¡¡interest¡¡in¡¡the¡¡plan¡£¡¡There¡¡were£»¡¡however£»¡¡other¡¡objections£»¡¡for¡¡there¡¡were¡¡those¡¡who¡¡felt¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was¡¡somewhat¡¡indefinite¡¡to¡¡promise¡¡admission¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Confederation¡¡of¡¡certain¡¡sections¡¡of¡¡the¡¡country¡¡as¡¡soon¡¡as¡¡their¡¡population¡¡should¡¡equal¡¡in¡¡number¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡least¡¡populous¡¡of¡¡the¡¡original¡¡States¡£¡¡If¡¡the¡¡original¡¡States¡¡should¡¡increase¡¡in¡¡population¡¡to¡¡any¡¡extent£»¡¡the¡¡new¡¡States¡¡might¡¡never¡¡be¡¡admitted¡£¡¡But¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand£»¡¡if¡¡from¡¡any¡¡cause¡¡the¡¡population¡¡of¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡smaller¡¡States¡¡should¡¡suddenly¡¡decrease£»¡¡might¡¡not¡¡the¡¡resulting¡¡influx¡¡of¡¡new¡¡States¡¡prove¡¡dangerous£¿¡¡But¡¡the¡¡real¡¡reason¡¡why¡¡the¡¡ordinance¡¡remained¡¡a¡¡dead¡¡letter¡¡was¡¡that£»¡¡while¡¡it¡¡fixed¡¡the¡¡limits¡¡within¡¡which¡¡local¡¡governments¡¡might¡¡act£»¡¡it¡¡left¡¡the¡¡creation¡¡of¡¡those¡¡governments¡¡wholly¡¡to¡¡the¡¡future¡£¡¡At¡¡Vincennes£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡the¡¡ordinance¡¡made¡¡no¡¡change¡¡in¡¡the¡¡political¡¡habits¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡£¡¡¡¨The¡¡local¡¡government¡¡bowled¡¡along¡¡merrily¡¡under¡¡this¡¡system¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡the¡¡greatest¡¡abundance¡¡of¡¡government£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡more¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡neglected¡¡them¡¡the¡¡more¡¡authority¡¡their¡¡officials¡¡assumed¡£¡¨*¡¡Nor¡¡could¡¡the¡¡ordinance¡¡operate¡¡until¡¡settlers¡¡became¡¡numerous¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡partly£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡to¡¡hasten¡¡settlement¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Ordinance¡¡of¡¡1785¡¡for¡¡the¡¡survey¡¡and¡¡sale¡¡of¡¡the¡¡public¡¡lands¡¡was¡¡passed¡£**¡¡*¡¡Jacob¡¡Piat¡¡Dunn£»¡¡Jr¡££»¡¡¡¨Indiana£º¡¡A¡¡Redemption¡¡from¡¡Slavery£»¡¨¡¡1888¡£¡¡**¡¡Although¡¡the¡¡machinery¡¡was¡¡set¡¡in¡¡motion£»¡¡by¡¡the¡¡appointment¡¡of¡¡men¡¡and¡¡the¡¡beginning¡¡of¡¡work£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡not¡¡until¡¡1789¡¡that¡¡the¡¡survey¡¡of¡¡the¡¡first¡¡seven¡¡ranges¡¡of¡¡townships¡¡was¡¡completed¡¡and¡¡the¡¡land¡¡offered¡¡for¡¡sale¡£

In¡¡the¡¡meantime¡¡efforts¡¡were¡¡being¡¡made¡¡by¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡improve¡¡the¡¡unsatisfactory¡¡ordinance¡¡for¡¡the¡¡government¡¡of¡¡the¡¡West¡£¡¡Committees¡¡were¡¡appointed£»¡¡reports¡¡were¡¡made£»¡¡and¡¡at¡¡intervals¡¡of¡¡weeks¡¡or¡¡months¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡was¡¡considered¡£¡¡Some¡¡amendments¡¡were¡¡actually¡¡adopted£»¡¡but¡¡Congress£»¡¡notoriously¡¡inefficient£»¡¡hesitated¡¡to¡¡undertake¡¡a¡¡fundamental¡¡revision¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ordinance¡£¡¡Then£»¡¡suddenly£»¡¡in¡¡July£»¡¡1787£»¡¡after¡¡a¡¡brief¡¡period¡¡of¡¡adjournment£»¡¡Congress¡¡took¡¡up¡¡this¡¡subject¡¡and¡¡within¡¡a¡¡week¡¡adopted¡¡the¡¡now¡¡famous¡¡Ordinance¡¡of¡¡1787¡£¡¡The¡¡stimulus¡¡which¡¡aroused¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡activity¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡have¡¡come¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Ohio¡¡Company¡£¡¡From¡¡the¡¡very¡¡beginning¡¡of¡¡the¡¡public¡¡domain¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a¡¡strong¡¡sentiment¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡using¡¡western¡¡land¡¡for¡¡settlement¡¡by¡¡Revolutionary¡¡soldiers¡£¡¡Some¡¡of¡¡these¡¡lands¡¡had¡¡been¡¡offered¡¡as¡¡bounties¡¡to¡¡encourage¡¡enlistment£»¡¡and¡¡after¡¡the¡¡war¡¡the¡¡project¡¡of¡¡soldiers'¡¡settlement¡¡in¡¡the¡¡West¡¡was¡¡vigorously¡¡agitated¡£¡¡The¡¡Ohio¡¡Company¡¡of¡¡Associates¡¡was¡¡made¡¡up¡¡of¡¡veterans¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Revolution£»¡¡who¡¡were¡¡looking¡¡for¡¡homes¡¡in¡¡the¡¡West£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡other¡¡persons¡¡who¡¡were¡¡willing¡¡to¡¡support¡¡a¡¡worthy¡¡cause¡¡by¡¡a¡¡subscription¡¡which¡¡might¡¡turn¡¡out¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡good¡¡investment¡£¡¡The¡¡company¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡buy¡¡land¡¡in¡¡the¡¡West£»¡¡and¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡land¡¡which¡¡it¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡sell¡£¡¡Under¡¡such¡¡circumstances¡¡it¡¡was¡¡easy¡¡to¡¡strike¡¡a¡¡bargain¡£¡¡The¡¡land£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡have¡¡seen£»¡¡was¡¡roughly¡¡estimated¡¡at¡¡one¡¡dollar¡¡an¡¡acre£»¡¡but£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡company¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡purchase¡¡a¡¡million¡¡acres£»¡¡it¡¡demanded¡¡and¡¡obtained¡¡wholesale¡¡rates¡¡of¡¡two¡­thirds¡¡of¡¡the¡¡usual¡¡price¡£¡¡It¡¡also¡¡obtained¡¡the¡¡privilege¡¡of¡¡paying¡¡at¡¡least¡¡a¡¡portion¡¡in¡¡certificates¡¡of¡¡Revolutionary¡¡indebtedness£»¡¡some¡¡of¡¡which¡¡were¡¡worth¡¡about¡¡twelve¡¡and¡¡a¡¡half¡¡cents¡¡on¡¡the¡¡dollar¡£¡¡Only¡¡a¡¡little¡¡calculation¡¡is¡¡required¡¡to¡¡show¡¡that¡¡a¡¡large¡¡quantity¡¡of¡¡land¡¡was¡¡therefore¡¡sold¡¡at¡¡about¡¡eight¡¡or¡¡nine¡¡cents¡¡an¡¡acre¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡in¡¡connection¡¡with¡¡this¡¡land¡¡sale¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Ordinance¡¡of¡¡1787¡¡was¡¡adopted¡£¡¡The¡¡promoter¡¡of¡¡this¡¡enterprise¡¡undertaken¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Ohio¡¡Company¡¡was¡¡Manasseh¡¡Cutler¡¡of¡¡Ipswich£»¡¡Massachusetts£»¡¡a¡¡clergyman¡¡by¡¡profession¡¡who¡¡had¡¡served¡¡as¡¡a¡¡chaplain¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Revolutionary¡¡War¡£¡¡But¡¡his¡¡interests¡¡and¡¡activities¡¡extended¡¡far¡¡beyond¡¡the¡¡bounds¡¡of¡¡his¡¡profession¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡his¡¡parish¡¡were¡¡without¡¡proper¡¡medical¡¡advice¡¡he¡¡applied¡¡himself¡¡to¡¡the¡¡study¡¡and¡¡practice¡¡of¡¡medicine¡£¡¡At¡¡about¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡he¡¡took¡¡up¡¡the¡¡study¡¡of¡¡botany£»¡¡and¡¡because¡¡of¡¡his¡¡describing¡¡several¡¡hundred¡¡species¡¡of¡¡plants¡¡he¡¡is¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡the¡¡pioneer¡¡botanist¡¡of¡¡New¡¡England¡£¡¡His¡¡next¡¡interest¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡have¡¡grown¡¡out¡¡of¡¡his¡¡Revolutionary¡¡associations£»¡¡for¡¡it¡¡centered¡¡in¡¡this¡¡project¡¡for¡¡settlement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡West£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡was¡¡appointed¡¡the¡¡agent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Ohio¡¡Company¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡in¡¡this¡¡capacity¡¡that¡¡he¡¡had¡¡come¡¡to¡¡New¡¡York¡¡and¡¡made¡¡the¡¡bargain¡¡with¡¡Congress¡¡which¡¡has¡¡just¡¡been¡¡described¡£¡¡Cutler¡¡must¡¡have¡¡been¡¡a¡¡good¡¡lobbyist£»¡¡for¡¡Congress¡¡was¡¡not¡¡an¡¡efficient¡¡body£»¡¡and¡¡unremitting¡¡labor£»¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡diplomacy£»¡¡was¡¡required¡¡for¡¡so¡¡large¡¡and¡¡important¡¡a¡¡matter¡£¡¡Two¡¡things¡¡indicate¡¡his¡¡method¡¡of¡¡procedure¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡first¡¡place¡¡he¡¡found¡¡it¡¡politic¡¡to¡¡drop¡¡his¡¡own¡¡candidate¡¡for¡¡the¡¡governorship¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡territory¡¡and¡¡to¡¡endorse¡¡General¡¡Arthur¡¡St¡£¡¡Clair£»¡¡then¡¡President¡¡of¡¡Congress¡£¡¡And¡¡in¡¡the¡¡next¡¡place¡¡he¡¡accepted¡¡the¡¡suggestion¡¡of¡¡Colonel¡¡William¡¡Duer¡¡for¡¡the¡¡formation¡¡of¡¡another¡¡company£»¡¡known¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Scioto¡¡Associates£»¡¡to¡¡purchase¡¡five¡¡million¡¡acres¡¡of¡¡land¡¡on¡¡similar¡¡terms£»¡¡¡¨but¡¡that¡¡it¡¡should¡¡be¡¡kept¡¡a¡¡profound¡¡secret¡£¡¨¡¡It¡¡was¡¡not¡¡an¡¡accident¡¡that¡¡Colonel¡¡Duer¡¡was¡¡Secretary¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Board¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Treasury¡¡through¡¡whom¡¡these¡¡purchases¡¡were¡¡made£»¡¡nor¡¡that¡¡associated¡¡with¡¡him¡¡in¡¡this¡¡speculation¡¡were¡¡¡¨a¡¡number¡¡of¡¡the¡¡principal¡¡characters¡¡in¡¡the¡¡city¡£¡¨¡¡These¡¡land¡¡deals¡¡were¡¡completed¡¡afterwards£»¡¡but¡¡there¡¡is¡¡little¡¡doubt¡¡that¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a¡¡direct¡¡connection¡¡between¡¡them¡¡and¡¡the¡¡adoption¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ordinance¡¡of¡¡government¡£¡¡The¡¡Ordinance¡¡of¡¡1787¡¡was¡¡so¡¡successful¡¡in¡¡its¡¡working¡¡and¡¡its¡¡renown¡¡became¡¡so¡¡g

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨1£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ